Signal Gold Inc.
Signal Gold Inc. SGNL.TO Peers
See (SGNL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGNL.TO | CA$0.09 | N/A | 32.1M | -1.42 | -CA$0.06 | N/A |
| AEM.TO | CA$163.11 | +1.44% | 82.5B | 25.25 | CA$6.46 | +0.99% |
| NGT.TO | CA$73.11 | +0.34% | 81.4B | 12.12 | CA$6.03 | +1.72% |
| WPM.TO | CA$119.25 | +0.83% | 54.1B | 63.77 | CA$1.87 | +0.74% |
| ABX.TO | CA$26.32 | +0.61% | 45.3B | 14.54 | CA$1.81 | +2.12% |
| FNV.TO | CA$233.14 | +0.32% | 44.9B | 52.75 | CA$4.42 | +0.88% |
| K.TO | CA$20.48 | +1.99% | 25.1B | 15.17 | CA$1.35 | +0.82% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$64.97 | +2.01% | 15.6B | 21.44 | CA$3.03 | +1.89% |
| AGI.TO | CA$35.60 | +0.11% | 15B | 42.89 | CA$0.83 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
SGNL.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while AEM.TO trades at CA$163.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NGT.TO trades at CA$73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while WPM.TO trades at CA$119.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 63.77. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ABX.TO trades at CA$26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while FNV.TO trades at CA$233.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs K.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while K.TO trades at CA$20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while LUG.TO trades at CA$64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while AGI.TO trades at CA$35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while OR.TO trades at CA$34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 144.88. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ELD.TO trades at CA$27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while OLA.TO trades at CA$14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while OGC.TO trades at CA$6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while EQX.TO trades at CA$9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while TXG.TO trades at CA$44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 88.29. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while DPM.TO trades at CA$21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while WDO.TO trades at CA$18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CXB.TO trades at CA$3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ORA.TO trades at CA$31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO and ORA.TO have similar daily volatility (5.71).
SGNL.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NG.TO trades at CA$4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -26.05. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SEA.TO trades at CA$17.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -114.40. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CNL.TO trades at CA$15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -23.62. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 781.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -81.25. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 674M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 592.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 494.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 473.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while FDR.V trades at CA$4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -35.69. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -34.14. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SBI.TO trades at CA$2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 239.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -38.33. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while STGO.TO trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 209.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 118.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 106M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 101.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs G.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while G.TO trades at CA$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while VAU.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO and VAU.V have similar daily volatility (5.71).
SGNL.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while PME.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs QIM.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is more volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while SGLD.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.
SGNL.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
SGNL.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGNL.TO stands at 32.1M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGNL.TO is priced at CA$0.09, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGNL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.42, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SGNL.TO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SGNL.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGNL.TO.