SFN Group, Inc.
SFN Group, Inc. (SFN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFN | $25.06 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ADP | $213.81 | +1.01% | 85.5B | 19.97 | $10.71 | +3.02% |
| PAYX | $93.71 | -0.18% | 33.6B | 20.69 | $4.53 | +4.61% |
| BZ | $14.20 | -0.77% | 6.6B | 16.32 | $0.87 | +1.18% |
| KFY | $65.97 | -0.90% | 3.4B | 13.08 | $5.04 | +3.03% |
| RHI | $26.06 | -1.81% | 2.7B | 20.06 | $1.30 | +9.09% |
| TNET | $41.45 | -1.05% | 1.9B | 12.28 | $3.38 | +2.69% |
| MAN | $28.04 | -3.14% | 1.3B | -77.92 | -$0.36 | +5.10% |
| HSII | $59.01 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 34.31 | $1.72 | +0.76% |
| NSP | $31.57 | -2.65% | 1.2B | -46.46 | -$0.68 | +7.56% |
Stock Comparison
SFN vs ADP Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while ADP trades at $213.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check ADP's competition here
SFN vs PAYX Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while PAYX trades at $93.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check PAYX's competition here
SFN vs BZ Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while BZ trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check BZ's competition here
SFN vs KFY Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while KFY trades at $65.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check KFY's competition here
SFN vs RHI Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while RHI trades at $26.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check RHI's competition here
SFN vs TNET Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while TNET trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check TNET's competition here
SFN vs MAN Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while MAN trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is -77.92. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check MAN's competition here
SFN vs HSII Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while HSII trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is more volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check HSII's competition here
SFN vs NSP Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while NSP trades at $31.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is -46.46. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NSP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check NSP's competition here
SFN vs UPWK Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while UPWK trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check UPWK's competition here
SFN vs HRT Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is more volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check HRT's competition here
SFN vs HHR Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check HHR's competition here
SFN vs KFRC Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while KFRC trades at $40.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check KFRC's competition here
SFN vs BBSI Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 717.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while BBSI trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check BBSI's competition here
SFN vs KELYB Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, KELYB has a market cap of 585.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while KELYB trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELYB's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KELYB's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to KELYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check KELYB's competition here
SFN vs KELYA Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 341.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while KELYA trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check KELYA's competition here
SFN vs ZIP Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while ZIP trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZIP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check ZIP's competition here
SFN vs TBI Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while TBI trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check TBI's competition here
SFN vs HQI Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while HQI trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check HQI's competition here
SFN vs DHX Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while DHX trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check DHX's competition here
SFN vs MHH Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while MHH trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 142.00. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check MHH's competition here
SFN vs BGSF Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while BGSF trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check BGSF's competition here
SFN vs JOB Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while JOB trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check JOB's competition here
SFN vs HSON Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while HSON trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check HSON's competition here
SFN vs NIXX Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while NIXX trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check NIXX's competition here
SFN vs RCRT Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check RCRT's competition here
SFN vs PIXY Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check PIXY's competition here
SFN vs GLXG Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while GLXG trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLXG's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check GLXG's competition here
SFN vs IPDN Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while IPDN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check IPDN's competition here
SFN vs CLIK Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while CLIK trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check CLIK's competition here
SFN vs EPWK Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 360.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while EPWK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is more volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check EPWK's competition here
SFN vs NIXXW Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 144.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while NIXXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check NIXXW's competition here
SFN vs RCRTW Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check RCRTW's competition here
SFN vs STAF Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 164. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while STAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STAF's ROE of -95.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to STAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check STAF's competition here
SFN vs CVG Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, CVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while CVG trades at $83.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is more volatile compared to CVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check CVG's competition here
SFN vs JOBS Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, JOBS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while JOBS trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is more volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check JOBS's competition here
SFN vs TRR Comparison May 2026
SFN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFN stands at 0. In comparison, TRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFN is priced at $25.06, while TRR trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFN is less volatile compared to TRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFN.Check TRR's competition here