Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KELYB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KELYB | $23.64 | +3.28% | 551.6M | 26.12 | $0.91 | +1.95% |
| BZ | $15.82 | +6.07% | 7.1B | 13.80 | $1.13 | +1.08% |
| RHI | $41.03 | -1.84% | 4.3B | 32.20 | $1.30 | +5.67% |
| KFY | $77.22 | -1.77% | 4B | 14.67 | $5.32 | +2.64% |
| TNET | $59.04 | -0.87% | 2.8B | 11.69 | $5.20 | +1.87% |
| MAN | $52.09 | -0.48% | 2.5B | 17.47 | $3.04 | +2.70% |
| NSP | $51.45 | +3.83% | 2B | 67.14 | $0.77 | +4.69% |
| HSII | $59.01 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 34.31 | $1.72 | +0.51% |
| UPWK | $9.20 | +1.49% | 1.2B | 10.14 | $0.92 | N/A |
| KFRC | $57.01 | -2.66% | 1B | 27.44 | $2.11 | +2.72% |
Stock Comparison
KELYB vs BZ Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while BZ trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BZ's competition here
KELYB vs RHI Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while RHI trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RHI's competition here
KELYB vs KFY Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while KFY trades at $77.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KFY's competition here
KELYB vs TNET Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while TNET trades at $59.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TNET's competition here
KELYB vs MAN Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while MAN trades at $52.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check MAN's competition here
KELYB vs NSP Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while NSP trades at $51.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is 67.14. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NSP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NSP's competition here
KELYB vs HSII Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while HSII trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HSII's competition here
KELYB vs UPWK Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while UPWK trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check UPWK's competition here
KELYB vs KFRC Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while KFRC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KFRC's competition here
KELYB vs BBSI Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 983.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while BBSI trades at $39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BBSI's competition here
KELYB vs HRT Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HRT's competition here
KELYB vs HHR Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HHR's competition here
KELYB vs KELYA Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 533.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while KELYA trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KELYA's competition here
KELYB vs ZIP Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while ZIP trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ZIP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check ZIP's competition here
KELYB vs TBI Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 261.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while TBI trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TBI's competition here
KELYB vs DHX Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while DHX trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check DHX's competition here
KELYB vs HQI Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while HQI trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HQI's competition here
KELYB vs MHH Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while MHH trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check MHH's competition here
KELYB vs BGSF Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while BGSF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BGSF's competition here
KELYB vs HSON Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while HSON trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HSON's competition here
KELYB vs NIXX Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while NIXX trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NIXX's competition here
KELYB vs JOB Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while JOB trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check JOB's competition here
KELYB vs RCRT Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RCRT's competition here
KELYB vs BIYA Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, BIYA has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while BIYA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas BIYA's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BIYA's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BIYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BIYA's competition here
KELYB vs PIXY Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check PIXY's competition here
KELYB vs CLIK Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 973.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while CLIK trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check CLIK's competition here
KELYB vs IPDN Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 848.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while IPDN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check IPDN's competition here
KELYB vs EPWK Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 360.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while EPWK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check EPWK's competition here
KELYB vs NIXXW Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 64.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while NIXXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NIXXW's competition here
KELYB vs RCRTW Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RCRTW's competition here
KELYB vs STAF Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 164. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while STAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STAF's ROE of -95.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to STAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check STAF's competition here
KELYB vs CVG Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, CVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while CVG trades at $83.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas CVG's P/E ratio is 94.37. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CVG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to CVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check CVG's competition here
KELYB vs JOBS Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, JOBS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while JOBS trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check JOBS's competition here
KELYB vs TRR Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, TRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while TRR trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas TRR's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to TRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TRR's competition here
KELYB vs SFN Comparison July 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 551.6M. In comparison, SFN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $23.64, while SFN trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of 26.12, whereas SFN's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SFN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to SFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check SFN's competition here