Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KELYB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KELYB | $18.50 | +2.78% | 629.8M | -2.38 | -$7.57 | +2.62% |
| ADP | $220.50 | +2.75% | 88.1B | 20.57 | $10.72 | +3.02% |
| PAYX | $97.99 | +2.15% | 35.1B | 18.21 | $5.38 | +4.50% |
| BZ | $13.14 | -3.24% | 6B | 12.40 | $1.06 | +1.28% |
| KFY | $71.72 | +5.83% | 3.7B | 14.23 | $5.04 | +2.80% |
| RHI | $29.33 | +0.76% | 3B | 22.57 | $1.30 | +7.97% |
| TNET | $45.82 | +6.31% | 2.1B | 13.54 | $3.38 | +2.43% |
| MAN | $32.26 | +2.97% | 1.5B | -89.62 | -$0.36 | +4.48% |
| NSP | $37.04 | +8.59% | 1.4B | -54.43 | -$0.68 | +6.47% |
| HSII | $59.01 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 34.31 | $1.72 | +0.51% |
Stock Comparison
KELYB vs ADP Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while ADP trades at $220.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check ADP's competition here
KELYB vs PAYX Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while PAYX trades at $97.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check PAYX's competition here
KELYB vs BZ Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while BZ trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BZ's competition here
KELYB vs KFY Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while KFY trades at $71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KFY's competition here
KELYB vs RHI Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while RHI trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RHI's competition here
KELYB vs TNET Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while TNET trades at $45.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TNET's competition here
KELYB vs MAN Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while MAN trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is -89.62. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check MAN's competition here
KELYB vs NSP Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while NSP trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is -54.43. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NSP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NSP's competition here
KELYB vs HSII Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while HSII trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HSII's competition here
KELYB vs UPWK Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while UPWK trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check UPWK's competition here
KELYB vs HRT Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HRT's competition here
KELYB vs BBSI Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 830.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while BBSI trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BBSI's competition here
KELYB vs KFRC Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 814.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while KFRC trades at $45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KFRC's competition here
KELYB vs HHR Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HHR's competition here
KELYB vs KELYA Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 393.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while KELYA trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check KELYA's competition here
KELYB vs ZIP Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 277.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while ZIP trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ZIP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check ZIP's competition here
KELYB vs TBI Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 195.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while TBI trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TBI's competition here
KELYB vs HQI Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while HQI trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HQI's competition here
KELYB vs DHX Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 166.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while DHX trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check DHX's competition here
KELYB vs MHH Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while MHH trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check MHH's competition here
KELYB vs BGSF Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while BGSF trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check BGSF's competition here
KELYB vs NIXX Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while NIXX trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NIXX's competition here
KELYB vs HSON Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while HSON trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check HSON's competition here
KELYB vs JOB Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while JOB trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check JOB's competition here
KELYB vs RCRT Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RCRT's competition here
KELYB vs PIXY Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check PIXY's competition here
KELYB vs GLXG Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while GLXG trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GLXG's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check GLXG's competition here
KELYB vs IPDN Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while IPDN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check IPDN's competition here
KELYB vs CLIK Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 960.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while CLIK trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check CLIK's competition here
KELYB vs EPWK Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 360.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while EPWK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check EPWK's competition here
KELYB vs NIXXW Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 185K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while NIXXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check NIXXW's competition here
KELYB vs RCRTW Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check RCRTW's competition here
KELYB vs STAF Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 164. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while STAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STAF's ROE of -95.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to STAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check STAF's competition here
KELYB vs SFN Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, SFN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while SFN trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas SFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SFN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to SFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check SFN's competition here
KELYB vs JOBS Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, JOBS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while JOBS trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check JOBS's competition here
KELYB vs CVG Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, CVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while CVG trades at $83.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas CVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CVG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to CVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check CVG's competition here
KELYB vs TRR Comparison June 2026
KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 629.8M. In comparison, TRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $18.50, while TRR trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -2.38, whereas TRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is more volatile compared to TRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.Check TRR's competition here