51job, Inc. (JOBS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JOBS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOBS | $60.90 | -0.05% | 0 | 42.20 | $1.44 | N/A |
| BZ | $15.60 | +4.59% | 7.1B | 13.80 | $1.13 | +1.13% |
| RHI | $41.83 | +0.07% | 4.3B | 32.20 | $1.30 | +5.70% |
| KFY | $78.25 | -0.46% | 4B | 14.67 | $5.32 | +2.64% |
| TNET | $60.77 | +2.03% | 2.8B | 11.69 | $5.20 | +1.89% |
| MAN | $53.43 | +2.08% | 2.5B | 17.47 | $3.04 | +2.78% |
| NSP | $51.58 | +4.10% | 2B | 67.14 | $0.77 | +4.87% |
| HSII | $59.01 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 34.31 | $1.72 | +0.51% |
| UPWK | $9.33 | +2.98% | 1.2B | 10.14 | $0.92 | N/A |
| KFRC | $58.01 | -0.94% | 1B | 27.44 | $2.11 | +2.73% |
Stock Comparison
JOBS vs BZ Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BZ trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BZ's competition here
JOBS vs RHI Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while RHI trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check RHI's competition here
JOBS vs KFY Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KFY trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KFY's competition here
JOBS vs TNET Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while TNET trades at $60.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check TNET's competition here
JOBS vs MAN Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while MAN trades at $53.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check MAN's competition here
JOBS vs NSP Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while NSP trades at $51.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is 67.14. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check NSP's competition here
JOBS vs HSII Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HSII trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HSII's competition here
JOBS vs UPWK Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while UPWK trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check UPWK's competition here
JOBS vs KFRC Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KFRC trades at $58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KFRC's competition here
JOBS vs BBSI Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 983.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BBSI trades at $40.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BBSI's competition here
JOBS vs HRT Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HRT's competition here
JOBS vs HHR Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HHR's competition here
JOBS vs KELYB Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KELYB has a market cap of 551.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KELYB trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KELYB's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KELYB's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KELYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KELYB's competition here
JOBS vs KELYA Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 533.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KELYA trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KELYA's competition here
JOBS vs ZIP Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while ZIP trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -14.21. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZIP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check ZIP's competition here
JOBS vs TBI Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 261.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while TBI trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check TBI's competition here
JOBS vs DHX Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while DHX trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check DHX's competition here
JOBS vs HQI Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HQI trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HQI's competition here
JOBS vs MHH Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while MHH trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check MHH's competition here
JOBS vs BGSF Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BGSF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BGSF's competition here
JOBS vs HSON Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HSON trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HSON's competition here
JOBS vs NIXX Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while NIXX trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check NIXX's competition here
JOBS vs JOB Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while JOB trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check JOB's competition here
JOBS vs RCRT Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check RCRT's competition here
JOBS vs BIYA Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BIYA has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BIYA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BIYA's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIYA's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BIYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BIYA's competition here
JOBS vs PIXY Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check PIXY's competition here
JOBS vs CLIK Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 973.6K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while CLIK trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check CLIK's competition here
JOBS vs IPDN Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 848.9K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while IPDN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check IPDN's competition here
JOBS vs EPWK Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 360.9K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while EPWK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check EPWK's competition here
JOBS vs NIXXW Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 64.3K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while NIXXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check NIXXW's competition here
JOBS vs RCRTW Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check RCRTW's competition here
JOBS vs STAF Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 164. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while STAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAF's ROE of -95.92%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to STAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check STAF's competition here
JOBS vs CVG Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, CVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while CVG trades at $83.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas CVG's P/E ratio is 94.37. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to CVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check CVG's competition here
JOBS vs TRR Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, TRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while TRR trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas TRR's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to TRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check TRR's competition here
JOBS vs SFN Comparison July 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, SFN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while SFN trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas SFN's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to SFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check SFN's competition here