51job, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for JOBS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for JOBS
51job, Inc. (JOBS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JOBS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOBS | $60.90 | -0.05% | 0 | 42.20 | $1.44 | N/A |
| ADP | $200.47 | +0.04% | 81.1B | 19.28 | $10.40 | +3.25% |
| PAYX | $91.96 | -0.18% | 32.9B | 20.30 | $4.53 | +4.72% |
| BZ | $14.21 | -0.98% | 6.6B | 16.52 | $0.86 | +1.18% |
| KFY | $65.76 | +0.52% | 3.4B | 13.05 | $5.04 | +3.04% |
| RHI | $27.44 | +3.94% | 2.8B | 20.64 | $1.33 | +8.63% |
| TNET | $38.77 | -0.21% | 1.8B | 12.11 | $3.20 | +2.89% |
| UPWK | $11.27 | +1.90% | 1.5B | 13.42 | $0.84 | N/A |
| MAN | $31.13 | +0.42% | 1.4B | -86.56 | -$0.36 | +4.64% |
| HSII | $59.01 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 34.31 | $1.72 | +1.02% |
Stock Comparison
JOBS vs ADP Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while ADP trades at $200.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check ADP's competition here
JOBS vs PAYX Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while PAYX trades at $91.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check PAYX's competition here
JOBS vs BZ Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BZ trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BZ's competition here
JOBS vs KFY Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KFY trades at $65.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KFY's competition here
JOBS vs RHI Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while RHI trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check RHI's competition here
JOBS vs TNET Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while TNET trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check TNET's competition here
JOBS vs UPWK Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while UPWK trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check UPWK's competition here
JOBS vs MAN Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while MAN trades at $31.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is -86.56. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check MAN's competition here
JOBS vs HSII Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HSII trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HSII's competition here
JOBS vs NSP Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while NSP trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is -152.18. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check NSP's competition here
JOBS vs HRT Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HRT's competition here
JOBS vs BBSI Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 765.2M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BBSI trades at $29.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BBSI's competition here
JOBS vs HHR Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HHR's competition here
JOBS vs KELYB Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KELYB has a market cap of 578.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KELYB trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KELYB's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KELYB's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KELYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KELYB's competition here
JOBS vs KFRC Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 557.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KFRC trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KFRC's competition here
JOBS vs KELYA Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 341.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while KELYA trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check KELYA's competition here
JOBS vs ZIP Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while ZIP trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZIP's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check ZIP's competition here
JOBS vs HQI Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HQI trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HQI's competition here
JOBS vs DHX Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while DHX trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check DHX's competition here
JOBS vs TBI Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while TBI trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check TBI's competition here
JOBS vs MHH Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while MHH trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 133.40. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check MHH's competition here
JOBS vs BGSF Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 68.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while BGSF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check BGSF's competition here
JOBS vs JOB Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while JOB trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check JOB's competition here
JOBS vs HSON Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while HSON trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check HSON's competition here
JOBS vs NIXX Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while NIXX trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check NIXX's competition here
JOBS vs RCRT Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check RCRT's competition here
JOBS vs GLXG Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while GLXG trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLXG's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check GLXG's competition here
JOBS vs PIXY Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check PIXY's competition here
JOBS vs IPDN Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while IPDN trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check IPDN's competition here
JOBS vs CLIK Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while CLIK trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check CLIK's competition here
JOBS vs EPWK Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 360.9K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while EPWK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check EPWK's competition here
JOBS vs NIXXW Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 345.2K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while NIXXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check NIXXW's competition here
JOBS vs RCRTW Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check RCRTW's competition here
JOBS vs STAF Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 164. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while STAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAF's ROE of -95.92%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to STAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check STAF's competition here
JOBS vs TRR Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, TRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while TRR trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas TRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to TRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check TRR's competition here
JOBS vs CVG Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, CVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while CVG trades at $83.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas CVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CVG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is more volatile compared to CVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check CVG's competition here
JOBS vs SFN Comparison April 2026
JOBS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JOBS stands at 0. In comparison, SFN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, JOBS is priced at $60.90, while SFN trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JOBS currently has a P/E ratio of 42.20, whereas SFN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, JOBS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JOBS is less volatile compared to SFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JOBS.Check SFN's competition here