Socket Mobile, Inc.
Socket Mobile, Inc. (SCKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCKT | $1.19 | -0.14% | 9.4M | -3.29 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| ANET | $114.28 | +0.21% | 143.6B | 48.23 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $131.22 | +2.24% | 89.1B | 20.60 | $6.37 | +1.48% |
| SMCI | $54.47 | +3.71% | 32.5B | 29.60 | $1.84 | N/A |
| STX | $150.89 | -1.20% | 32B | 21.71 | $6.95 | +1.90% |
| HPQ | $25.68 | -0.04% | 24.1B | 9.88 | $2.60 | +4.48% |
| WDC | $68.82 | -0.29% | 24B | 23.57 | $2.92 | +0.15% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $104.94 | +0.27% | 21B | 18.48 | $5.68 | +1.98% |
| PSTG | $57.59 | +1.11% | 18.8B | 151.63 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCKT vs ANET Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 143.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while ANET trades at $114.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check ANET's competition here
SCKT vs DELL Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while DELL trades at $131.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check DELL's competition here
SCKT vs SMCI Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while SMCI trades at $54.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check SMCI's competition here
SCKT vs STX Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while STX trades at $150.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check STX's competition here
SCKT vs HPQ Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while HPQ trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check HPQ's competition here
SCKT vs WDC Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while WDC trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check WDC's competition here
SCKT vs CAJ Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check CAJ's competition here
SCKT vs NTAP Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while NTAP trades at $104.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check NTAP's competition here
SCKT vs PSTG Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while PSTG trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 151.63. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check PSTG's competition here
SCKT vs LOGI Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while LOGI trades at $96.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check LOGI's competition here
SCKT vs IONQ Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while IONQ trades at $43.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -28.58. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check IONQ's competition here
SCKT vs IONQ-WT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while IONQ-WT trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
SCKT vs SNDKV Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check SNDKV's competition here
SCKT vs QBTS-WT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while QBTS-WT trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
SCKT vs QBTS Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while QBTS trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -28.58. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check QBTS's competition here
SCKT vs RGTIW Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while RGTIW trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check RGTIW's competition here
SCKT vs RGTI Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while RGTI trades at $15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check RGTI's competition here
SCKT vs QUBT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while QUBT trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -30.95. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check QUBT's competition here
SCKT vs CRCT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while CRCT trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check CRCT's competition here
SCKT vs MKFG-WT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
SCKT vs CRSR Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 986.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while CRSR trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check CRSR's competition here
SCKT vs RCAT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 929.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while RCAT trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check RCAT's competition here
SCKT vs SSYS Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 913.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while SSYS trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check SSYS's competition here
SCKT vs NNDM Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 322.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while NNDM trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check NNDM's competition here
SCKT vs DDD Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 244.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while DDD trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check DDD's competition here
SCKT vs CAN Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 228.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while CAN trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check CAN's competition here
SCKT vs DM Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check DM's competition here
SCKT vs TIO Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check TIO's competition here
SCKT vs MICT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check MICT's competition here
SCKT vs OSS Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while OSS trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check OSS's competition here
SCKT vs MKFG Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check MKFG's competition here
SCKT vs INVE Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while INVE trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check INVE's competition here
SCKT vs ALOT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while ALOT trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check ALOT's competition here
SCKT vs YIBO Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while YIBO trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check YIBO's competition here
SCKT vs ZSPC Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while ZSPC trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check ZSPC's competition here
SCKT vs STRC Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check STRC's competition here
SCKT vs QMCO Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while QMCO trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check QMCO's competition here
SCKT vs UAVS Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while UAVS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check UAVS's competition here
SCKT vs TACT Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while TACT trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check TACT's competition here
SCKT vs FATH Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check FATH's competition here
SCKT vs KTCC Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while KTCC trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check KTCC's competition here
SCKT vs EBON Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while EBON trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check EBON's competition here
SCKT vs SGE Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check SGE's competition here
SCKT vs VLD Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check VLD's competition here
SCKT vs VJET Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check VJET's competition here
SCKT vs STRCW Comparison July 2025
SCKT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCKT stands at 9.4M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCKT is priced at $1.19, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCKT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.29, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SCKT's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SCKT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCKT.Check STRCW's competition here