Salzer Electronics Limited

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹8,118.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹8,120.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹724.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹724.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 99.46. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 889.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,403.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.71. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 888.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,402.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 59.89. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 473B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while KEI.BO trades at ₹4,782.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 54.83. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check KEI.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 472.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while KEI.NS trades at ₹4,781.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 54.71. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 424.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹10,825.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.79. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 423B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹10,814.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 278B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹31,610.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 55.01. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 277.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹31,600.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 208.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹879.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 85.06. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 196.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹700.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 196.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹700.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹1,502.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹1,502.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹859.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹858.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹682.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹683.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹312.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 47.92. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹313.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹812.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹812.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check TRIL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HEG.BO trades at ₹564.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HEG.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HEG.NS trades at ₹564.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹302.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹8,433.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹8,429.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, STLTECH.BO has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while STLTECH.BO trades at ₹165.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas STLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 2773.33. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STLTECH.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to STLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check STLTECH.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹258.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹257.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹884.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 64.99. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO and QPOWER.NS have similar daily volatility (3.11).Check QPOWER.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹883.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 65.20. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹302.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹301.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹3,762.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹319.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹319.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,425.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,423.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,413.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 47.17. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹139.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.28. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,414.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹325.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 51.62. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹324.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 58.87. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹681.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹677.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HPL.NS trades at ₹346.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HPL.BO trades at ₹346.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,395.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹74.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹1,513.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹1,511.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹277.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹278.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹94.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹94.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹236.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹661.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹660.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹151.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹245.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹131.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹132.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹557.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while WSI.NS trades at ₹72.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while RMC.BO trades at ₹432.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹138.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹139.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹18.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.53. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹486.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹324.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹637.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹642.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹2,359.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while DEL.BO trades at ₹184.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.71. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check DEL.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹25.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹840.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 48.15. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹335.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -47.94. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹333.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -47.20. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PANAENERG.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PANAENERG.BO trades at ₹298.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PANAENERG.BO's P/E ratio is 76.64. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PANAENERG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to PANAENERG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PANAENERG.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PANCARBON.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PANCARBON.BO trades at ₹471.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PANCARBON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PANCARBON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to PANCARBON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PANCARBON.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹168.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹168.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while VETO.BO trades at ₹106.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check VETO.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while VETO.NS trades at ₹106.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check VETO.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LAKSELEC.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while LAKSELEC.BO trades at ₹751.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas LAKSELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 69.25. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LAKSELEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to LAKSELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check LAKSELEC.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹78.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check APLAB.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PLAZACABLE.BO trades at ₹38.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PLAZACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLAZACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PLAZACABLE.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PLAZACABLE.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while PLAZACABLE.NS trades at ₹38.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas PLAZACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 47.42. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLAZACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to PLAZACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check PLAZACABLE.NS's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹902.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is more volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here

SALZER.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SALZER.BO stands at 7.1B. In comparison, STARDELTA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SALZER.BO is priced at ₹444.60, while STARDELTA.BO trades at ₹471.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SALZER.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 32.64, whereas STARDELTA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SALZER.BO's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STARDELTA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SALZER.BO is less volatile compared to STARDELTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SALZER.BO.Check STARDELTA.BO's competition here