LWS Knitwear Limited

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, NIBE.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while NIBE.BO trades at ₹1,061.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas NIBE.BO's P/E ratio is -222.93. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIBE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to NIBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check NIBE.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, MAFATIND.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while MAFATIND.BO trades at ₹130.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas MAFATIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAFATIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to MAFATIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check MAFATIND.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, VTMLTD.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while VTMLTD.BO trades at ₹76.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas VTMLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTMLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to VTMLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check VTMLTD.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RAJPALAYAM.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RAJPALAYAM.BO trades at ₹798.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RAJPALAYAM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RAJPALAYAM.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, VOITHPAPR.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while VOITHPAPR.BO trades at ₹1,624.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas VOITHPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOITHPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to VOITHPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check VOITHPAPR.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GLOSTERLTD.NS trades at ₹578.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GLOSTERLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 83.14. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.NS's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GLOSTERLTD.BO trades at ₹576.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GLOSTERLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 83.12. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SHRJAGP.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SHRJAGP.BO trades at ₹626.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SHRJAGP.BO's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHRJAGP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SHRJAGP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SHRJAGP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, LAKSHMIMIL.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while LAKSHMIMIL.BO trades at ₹7,678.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas LAKSHMIMIL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.48. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check LAKSHMIMIL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, AKSPINTEX.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while AKSPINTEX.BO trades at ₹943.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas AKSPINTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKSPINTEX.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to AKSPINTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check AKSPINTEX.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, MANOMAY.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while MANOMAY.NS trades at ₹231.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas MANOMAY.NS's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANOMAY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to MANOMAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check MANOMAY.NS's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RAGHUSYN.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RAGHUSYN.BO trades at ₹99.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RAGHUSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 59.87. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAGHUSYN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to RAGHUSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RAGHUSYN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, HIMFIBP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while HIMFIBP.BO trades at ₹43.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas HIMFIBP.BO's P/E ratio is -118.30. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIMFIBP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to HIMFIBP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check HIMFIBP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SUDTIND-B.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SUDTIND-B.BO trades at ₹90.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SUDTIND-B.BO's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUDTIND-B.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SUDTIND-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SUDTIND-B.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while CNOVAPETRO.BO trades at ₹112.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas CNOVAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -211.51. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, LUDLOWJUT.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while LUDLOWJUT.BO trades at ₹262.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas LUDLOWJUT.BO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check LUDLOWJUT.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RNBDENIMS.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RNBDENIMS.BO trades at ₹14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RNBDENIMS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RNBDENIMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to RNBDENIMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RNBDENIMS.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, MKEXIM.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while MKEXIM.BO trades at ₹65.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas MKEXIM.BO's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKEXIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to MKEXIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check MKEXIM.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, CANDOUR.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while CANDOUR.BO trades at ₹141.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas CANDOUR.BO's P/E ratio is -63.94. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CANDOUR.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to CANDOUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check CANDOUR.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, BARODARY.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while BARODARY.BO trades at ₹111.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas BARODARY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BARODARY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to BARODARY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check BARODARY.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RACE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RACE.NS trades at ₹127.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RACE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RACE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to RACE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RACE.NS's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, FILATFASH.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while FILATFASH.BO trades at ₹0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas FILATFASH.BO's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FILATFASH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to FILATFASH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check FILATFASH.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, OSIAJEE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while OSIAJEE.BO trades at ₹400.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas OSIAJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSIAJEE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to OSIAJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check OSIAJEE.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, BTTL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while BTTL.BO trades at ₹36.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas BTTL.BO's P/E ratio is 183.00. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTTL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to BTTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check BTTL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SUPER.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SUPER.BO trades at ₹672.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SUPER.BO's P/E ratio is 61.92. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUPER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SUPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SUPER.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SHAHLON.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SHAHLON.BO trades at ₹22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SHAHLON.BO's P/E ratio is 50.68. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHAHLON.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SHAHLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SHAHLON.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RRIL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RRIL.BO trades at ₹15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RRIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to RRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RRIL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, JATTAINDUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while JATTAINDUS.BO trades at ₹411.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas JATTAINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 1285.94. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JATTAINDUS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to JATTAINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check JATTAINDUS.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SHRIDINE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SHRIDINE.BO trades at ₹322.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SHRIDINE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHRIDINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIDINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SHRIDINE.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ZBINTXPP.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ZBINTXPP.BO trades at ₹2,254.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ZBINTXPP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBINTXPP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to ZBINTXPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ZBINTXPP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, WINSOMTX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while WINSOMTX.BO trades at ₹76.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas WINSOMTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WINSOMTX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to WINSOMTX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check WINSOMTX.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SURYALA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SURYALA.BO trades at ₹341.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SURYALA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SURYALA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SURYALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SURYALA.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SWADPOL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SWADPOL.BO trades at ₹36.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SWADPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.57. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWADPOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SWADPOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SWADPOL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, PREMCO.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while PREMCO.BO trades at ₹419.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas PREMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PREMCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to PREMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check PREMCO.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ARL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ARL.BO trades at ₹62.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ARL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to ARL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ARL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, LAHOTIOV.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while LAHOTIOV.BO trades at ₹44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas LAHOTIOV.BO's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAHOTIOV.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to LAHOTIOV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check LAHOTIOV.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ADDIND.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ADDIND.BO trades at ₹108.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ADDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to ADDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ADDIND.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, AICHAMP.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while AICHAMP.BO trades at ₹36.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas AICHAMP.BO's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AICHAMP.BO's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to AICHAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check AICHAMP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GARNETINT.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GARNETINT.BO trades at ₹55.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GARNETINT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GARNETINT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to GARNETINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GARNETINT.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, JCTLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while JCTLTD.BO trades at ₹1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas JCTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JCTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to JCTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check JCTLTD.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, KGPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while KGPETRO.BO trades at ₹200.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas KGPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to KGPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check KGPETRO.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, VIPPYSP.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while VIPPYSP.BO trades at ₹176.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas VIPPYSP.BO's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIPPYSP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to VIPPYSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check VIPPYSP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SURATRAML.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SURATRAML.BO trades at ₹4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SURATRAML.BO's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SURATRAML.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SURATRAML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SURATRAML.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, BHILSPIN.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while BHILSPIN.BO trades at ₹111.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas BHILSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -48.05. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHILSPIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to BHILSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check BHILSPIN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, HINDAPL.BO has a market cap of 994.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while HINDAPL.BO trades at ₹99.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas HINDAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 901.55. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINDAPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to HINDAPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check HINDAPL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.NS has a market cap of 952.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while DIGJAMLMTD.NS trades at ₹47.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.NS's P/E ratio is 59.51. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check DIGJAMLMTD.NS's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, BHUDEVI.BO has a market cap of 951.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while BHUDEVI.BO trades at ₹207.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas BHUDEVI.BO's P/E ratio is -61.54. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHUDEVI.BO's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to BHUDEVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check BHUDEVI.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, AMARJOTHI.BO has a market cap of 928.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while AMARJOTHI.BO trades at ₹137.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas AMARJOTHI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMARJOTHI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to AMARJOTHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check AMARJOTHI.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ECOHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 892.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ECOHOTELS.BO trades at ₹16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ECOHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is -14.04. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECOHOTELS.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to ECOHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ECOHOTELS.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKSP.BO has a market cap of 877.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while DEEPAKSP.BO trades at ₹122.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas DEEPAKSP.BO's P/E ratio is 164.89. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DEEPAKSP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check DEEPAKSP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, INDIANACRY.BO has a market cap of 872.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while INDIANACRY.BO trades at ₹6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas INDIANACRY.BO's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIANACRY.BO's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANACRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check INDIANACRY.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, APMIN.BO has a market cap of 871.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while APMIN.BO trades at ₹40.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas APMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 56.80. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APMIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to APMIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check APMIN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, CFEL.BO has a market cap of 842.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while CFEL.BO trades at ₹33.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas CFEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFEL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to CFEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check CFEL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, FLORATX.BO has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while FLORATX.BO trades at ₹138.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas FLORATX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLORATX.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to FLORATX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check FLORATX.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, TTFL.BO has a market cap of 821M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while TTFL.BO trades at ₹54.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas TTFL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to TTFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check TTFL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ALSTONE.BO has a market cap of 815.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ALSTONE.BO trades at ₹0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ALSTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSTONE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to ALSTONE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ALSTONE.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SHINEFASH.BO has a market cap of 815.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SHINEFASH.BO trades at ₹32.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SHINEFASH.BO's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHINEFASH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SHINEFASH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SHINEFASH.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SUPTANERY.BO has a market cap of 793.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SUPTANERY.BO trades at ₹7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SUPTANERY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUPTANERY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SUPTANERY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SUPTANERY.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, LAKHOTIA.BO has a market cap of 775.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while LAKHOTIA.BO trades at ₹74.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas LAKHOTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAKHOTIA.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to LAKHOTIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check LAKHOTIA.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SHUBHAM.BO has a market cap of 769.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SHUBHAM.BO trades at ₹63.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SHUBHAM.BO's P/E ratio is 99.19. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHUBHAM.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SHUBHAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SHUBHAM.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SANTETX.BO has a market cap of 761.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SANTETX.BO trades at ₹133.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SANTETX.BO's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANTETX.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SANTETX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SANTETX.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, EVERFIN.BO has a market cap of 731.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while EVERFIN.BO trades at ₹118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas EVERFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVERFIN.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to EVERFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check EVERFIN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SKYIND.BO has a market cap of 673.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SKYIND.BO trades at ₹85.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SKYIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKYIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SKYIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SKYIND.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ASHNOOR.BO has a market cap of 659.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ASHNOOR.BO trades at ₹41.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ASHNOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASHNOOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to ASHNOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ASHNOOR.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RIBATEX.BO has a market cap of 597.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RIBATEX.BO trades at ₹61.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RIBATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIBATEX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to RIBATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RIBATEX.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ARMAN.BO has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ARMAN.BO trades at ₹106.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ARMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 100.90. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARMAN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to ARMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ARMAN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, BETXIND.BO has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while BETXIND.BO trades at ₹359.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas BETXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BETXIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to BETXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check BETXIND.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, MOHITE.BO has a market cap of 536.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while MOHITE.BO trades at ₹2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas MOHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOHITE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to MOHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check MOHITE.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SHANTAI.BO has a market cap of 536.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SHANTAI.BO trades at ₹71.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SHANTAI.BO's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHANTAI.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SHANTAI.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, AKI.NS has a market cap of 526.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while AKI.NS trades at ₹5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas AKI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AKI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to AKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check AKI.NS's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, KAMADGIRI.BO has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while KAMADGIRI.BO trades at ₹89.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas KAMADGIRI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.34. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAMADGIRI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to KAMADGIRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check KAMADGIRI.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, VICTMILL.BO has a market cap of 522.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while VICTMILL.BO trades at ₹5,300.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas VICTMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VICTMILL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to VICTMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check VICTMILL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, TILAK.BO has a market cap of 521.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while TILAK.BO trades at ₹1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas TILAK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TILAK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to TILAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check TILAK.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, DHANFAB.BO has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while DHANFAB.BO trades at ₹56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas DHANFAB.BO's P/E ratio is -33.14. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHANFAB.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to DHANFAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check DHANFAB.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, WIREFABR.BO has a market cap of 469.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while WIREFABR.BO trades at ₹153.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas WIREFABR.BO's P/E ratio is 111.23. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WIREFABR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to WIREFABR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check WIREFABR.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GOKAKTEX.BO has a market cap of 453.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GOKAKTEX.BO trades at ₹69.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GOKAKTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOKAKTEX.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to GOKAKTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GOKAKTEX.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.NS has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while CNOVAPETRO.NS trades at ₹16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas CNOVAPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.NS's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SAMBANDAM.BO has a market cap of 430.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SAMBANDAM.BO trades at ₹100.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SAMBANDAM.BO's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAMBANDAM.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SAMBANDAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SAMBANDAM.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, HPCOTTON.BO has a market cap of 427.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while HPCOTTON.BO trades at ₹109.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas HPCOTTON.BO's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPCOTTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to HPCOTTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check HPCOTTON.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GTNINDS.BO has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GTNINDS.BO trades at ₹24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GTNINDS.BO's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTNINDS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to GTNINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GTNINDS.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SREEJAYA.BO has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SREEJAYA.BO trades at ₹92.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SREEJAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -172.04. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SREEJAYA.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SREEJAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SREEJAYA.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, KGDENIM.BO has a market cap of 415.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while KGDENIM.BO trades at ₹16.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas KGDENIM.BO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGDENIM.BO's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to KGDENIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check KGDENIM.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ANJANI.BO has a market cap of 410.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ANJANI.BO trades at ₹27.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ANJANI.BO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANJANI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to ANJANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ANJANI.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, AREXMIS.BO has a market cap of 389.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while AREXMIS.BO trades at ₹108.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas AREXMIS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AREXMIS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to AREXMIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check AREXMIS.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, PBMPOLY.BO has a market cap of 378.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while PBMPOLY.BO trades at ₹55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas PBMPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -60.44. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PBMPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to PBMPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check PBMPOLY.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SURYAAMBA.BO has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SURYAAMBA.BO trades at ₹127.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SURYAAMBA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SURYAAMBA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to SURYAAMBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SURYAAMBA.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GEMSPIN.BO has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GEMSPIN.BO trades at ₹5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GEMSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -73.12. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEMSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to GEMSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GEMSPIN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, SWASTIVI.BO has a market cap of 351.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while SWASTIVI.BO trades at ₹3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas SWASTIVI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWASTIVI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to SWASTIVI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check SWASTIVI.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, YARNSYN.BO has a market cap of 332.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while YARNSYN.BO trades at ₹15.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas YARNSYN.BO's P/E ratio is -23.52. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YARNSYN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to YARNSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check YARNSYN.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, GINISILK.BO has a market cap of 324.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while GINISILK.BO trades at ₹57.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas GINISILK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GINISILK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to GINISILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check GINISILK.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ANGEL.BO has a market cap of 319M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ANGEL.BO trades at ₹12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ANGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANGEL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to ANGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ANGEL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, CAMEXLTD.BO has a market cap of 315.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while CAMEXLTD.BO trades at ₹30.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas CAMEXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAMEXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to CAMEXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check CAMEXLTD.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, PARMSILK.BO has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while PARMSILK.BO trades at ₹104.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas PARMSILK.BO's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PARMSILK.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to PARMSILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check PARMSILK.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, KATRSPG.BO has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while KATRSPG.BO trades at ₹106.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas KATRSPG.BO's P/E ratio is -23.09. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KATRSPG.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to KATRSPG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check KATRSPG.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, ADITYASP.BO has a market cap of 287.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while ADITYASP.BO trades at ₹17.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas ADITYASP.BO's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADITYASP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to ADITYASP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check ADITYASP.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, KAPILCO.BO has a market cap of 285.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while KAPILCO.BO trades at ₹148.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas KAPILCO.BO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAPILCO.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to KAPILCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check KAPILCO.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, HINDMILL.BO has a market cap of 266.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while HINDMILL.BO trades at ₹160.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas HINDMILL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINDMILL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is more volatile compared to HINDMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check HINDMILL.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, PASUSPG.BO has a market cap of 263.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while PASUSPG.BO trades at ₹28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas PASUSPG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PASUSPG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to PASUSPG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check PASUSPG.BO's competition here

LWSKNIT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LWSKNIT.BO stands at 244.9M. In comparison, RAJKSYN.BO has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LWSKNIT.BO is priced at ₹16.74, while RAJKSYN.BO trades at ₹39.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LWSKNIT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.33, whereas RAJKSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 71.27. In terms of profitability, LWSKNIT.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAJKSYN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LWSKNIT.BO is less volatile compared to RAJKSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LWSKNIT.BO.Check RAJKSYN.BO's competition here