Nakoda Ltd.
Nakoda Ltd. (NAKODA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAKODA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: NaN Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAKODA.NS | ₹0.10 | +0.00% | 30M | 0.04 | ₹2.31 | N/A |
| E1AIRTELPP.NS | ₹1,061.30 | -0.18% | 6.2T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| OPAL.NS | ₹43.00 | +0.00% | 7.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EFFWA.NS | ₹278.45 | +4.35% | 6.4B | 32.08 | ₹8.68 | N/A |
| HIGREEN.NS | ₹138.15 | -1.88% | 3.5B | 32.74 | ₹4.22 | N/A |
| FELIX.NS | ₹201.55 | +1.61% | 2.8B | 19.20 | ₹10.50 | N/A |
| GIRRESORTS.NS | ₹113.65 | N/A | 2B | 3788.33 | ₹0.03 | N/A |
| LAWSIKHO.NS | ₹110.05 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 16.33 | ₹6.74 | N/A |
| AURDIS.NS | ₹140.40 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 14.22 | ₹9.87 | N/A |
| PINCON.NS | ₹6.90 | +0.00% | 329.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NAKODA.NS vs E1AIRTELPP.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, E1AIRTELPP.NS has a market cap of 6.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while E1AIRTELPP.NS trades at ₹1,061.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas E1AIRTELPP.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to E1AIRTELPP.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and E1AIRTELPP.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check E1AIRTELPP.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs OPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, OPAL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while OPAL.NS trades at ₹43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas OPAL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OPAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and OPAL.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check OPAL.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs EFFWA.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, EFFWA.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while EFFWA.NS trades at ₹278.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas EFFWA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EFFWA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and EFFWA.NS has daily volatility of 7.76.Check EFFWA.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs HIGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, HIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while HIGREEN.NS trades at ₹138.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas HIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HIGREEN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and HIGREEN.NS has daily volatility of 6.29.Check HIGREEN.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs FELIX.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, FELIX.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while FELIX.NS trades at ₹201.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas FELIX.NS's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FELIX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and FELIX.NS has daily volatility of 5.34.Check FELIX.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs GIRRESORTS.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, GIRRESORTS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while GIRRESORTS.NS trades at ₹113.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas GIRRESORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 3788.33. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GIRRESORTS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and GIRRESORTS.NS has daily volatility of 0.00.Check GIRRESORTS.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs LAWSIKHO.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, LAWSIKHO.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while LAWSIKHO.NS trades at ₹110.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas LAWSIKHO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LAWSIKHO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and LAWSIKHO.NS has daily volatility of 1.89.Check LAWSIKHO.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs AURDIS.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, AURDIS.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while AURDIS.NS trades at ₹140.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas AURDIS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AURDIS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and AURDIS.NS has daily volatility of 0.00.Check AURDIS.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs PINCON.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, PINCON.NS has a market cap of 329.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while PINCON.NS trades at ₹6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas PINCON.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PINCON.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and PINCON.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check PINCON.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs INNOVATIVE.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, INNOVATIVE.NS has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while INNOVATIVE.NS trades at ₹161.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas INNOVATIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INNOVATIVE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and INNOVATIVE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check INNOVATIVE.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs ARTEDZ.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, ARTEDZ.NS has a market cap of 95.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while ARTEDZ.NS trades at ₹19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas ARTEDZ.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARTEDZ.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and ARTEDZ.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check ARTEDZ.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs KTL.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, KTL.NS has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while KTL.NS trades at ₹4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas KTL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KTL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and KTL.NS has daily volatility of 0.00.Check KTL.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs SAHAJ.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, SAHAJ.NS has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while SAHAJ.NS trades at ₹3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas SAHAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAHAJ.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and SAHAJ.NS has daily volatility of 0.00.Check SAHAJ.NS's competition here
NAKODA.NS vs JSLL-ST.NS Comparison May 2026
NAKODA.NS plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAKODA.NS stands at 30M. In comparison, JSLL-ST.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAKODA.NS is priced at ₹0.10, while JSLL-ST.NS trades at ₹1,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAKODA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.04, whereas JSLL-ST.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAKODA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSLL-ST.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAKODA.NS has daily volatility of N/A and JSLL-ST.NS has daily volatility of 2.45.Check JSLL-ST.NS's competition here