RPM International Inc.
RPM International Inc. RPM Peers
See (RPM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPM | $114.41 | +0.12% | 14.69B | 22.93 | $4.99 | +1.73% |
| LIN | $450.67 | -0.83% | 212.14B | 32.75 | $13.76 | +1.25% |
| SHW | $362.32 | +1.98% | 91.07B | 34.34 | $10.55 | +0.82% |
| ECL | $251.25 | -1.27% | 71.23B | 34.18 | $7.35 | +0.97% |
| APD | $273.55 | -0.96% | 60.88B | 39.47 | $6.93 | +2.58% |
| DD | $70.61 | -0.93% | 29.55B | 2353.67 | $0.03 | +2.19% |
| PPG | $113.32 | -0.78% | 25.72B | 20.06 | $5.65 | +2.38% |
| IFF | $76.48 | +0.17% | 19.56B | -23.46 | -$3.26 | +2.10% |
| LYB | $60.34 | -0.56% | 19.39B | 20.88 | $2.89 | +8.86% |
| WLK | $86.53 | +1.02% | 11.10B | 28.94 | $2.99 | +2.39% |
Stock Comparison
RPM vs LIN Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, LIN has a market cap of 212.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while LIN trades at $450.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LIN's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to LIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs SHW Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, SHW has a market cap of 91.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while SHW trades at $362.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SHW's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHW's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ECL Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ECL has a market cap of 71.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ECL trades at $251.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ECL's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ECL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs APD Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, APD has a market cap of 60.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while APD trades at $273.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas APD's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to APD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs DD Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, DD has a market cap of 29.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while DD trades at $70.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DD's P/E ratio is 2353.67. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to DD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs PPG Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, PPG has a market cap of 25.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while PPG trades at $113.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PPG's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to PPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs IFF Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, IFF has a market cap of 19.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while IFF trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas IFF's P/E ratio is -23.46. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to IFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs LYB Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, LYB has a market cap of 19.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while LYB trades at $60.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LYB's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LYB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs WLK Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, WLK has a market cap of 11.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while WLK trades at $86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas WLK's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WLK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to WLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs SQM Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, SQM has a market cap of 10.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while SQM trades at $35.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SQM's P/E ratio is -25.27. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SQM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SQM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs EMN Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, EMN has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while EMN trades at $82.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas EMN's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to EMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs AVTR Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, AVTR has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while AVTR trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AVTR's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to AVTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ALB Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ALB has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ALB trades at $61.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ALB's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs AXTA Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, AXTA has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while AXTA trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AXTA's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXTA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to AXTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ALTM Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ALTM has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ALTM trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ALTM's P/E ratio is 64.89. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ALTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs NEU Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, NEU has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while NEU trades at $633.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NEU's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEU's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to NEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs IKNX Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, IKNX has a market cap of 5.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while IKNX trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas IKNX's P/E ratio is -153.39. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IKNX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to IKNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ESI Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ESI has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ESI trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ESI's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs BCPC Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, BCPC has a market cap of 5.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while BCPC trades at $164.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas BCPC's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCPC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to BCPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs CBT Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, CBT has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while CBT trades at $76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CBT's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs SXT Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, SXT has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while SXT trades at $92.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SXT's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SXT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs AVNT Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, AVNT has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while AVNT trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas AVNT's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AVNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to AVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs WDFC Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, WDFC has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while WDFC trades at $239.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas WDFC's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDFC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to WDFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs FUL Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, FUL has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while FUL trades at $56.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas FUL's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to FUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs LTHM Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, LTHM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while LTHM trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LTHM's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LTHM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs OLN Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, OLN has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while OLN trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas OLN's P/E ratio is 43.25. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to OLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs HWKN Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, HWKN has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while HWKN trades at $120.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HWKN's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWKN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to HWKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs SSL Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, SSL has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while SSL trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SSL's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ASH Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ASH has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ASH trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ASH's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs IOSP Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, IOSP has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while IOSP trades at $90.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas IOSP's P/E ratio is 63.70. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IOSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to IOSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs KWR Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, KWR has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while KWR trades at $109.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KWR's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KWR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to KWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs PQG Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, PQG has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while PQG trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PQG's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PQG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to PQG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs MTX Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, MTX has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while MTX trades at $58.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MTX's P/E ratio is -75.32. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to MTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs PRM Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, PRM has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while PRM trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas PRM's P/E ratio is -304.75. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to PRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs CC Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, CC has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while CC trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CC's P/E ratio is 65.42. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to CC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs NGVT Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, NGVT has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while NGVT trades at $43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NGVT's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGVT's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to NGVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs SCL Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, SCL has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while SCL trades at $54.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SCL's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to SCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs CCF Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, CCF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while CCF trades at $127.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CCF's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ECVT Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ECVT has a market cap of 879.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ECVT trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ECVT's P/E ratio is -74.95. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ECVT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ECVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs KRO Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, KRO has a market cap of 877.72M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while KRO trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KRO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to KRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs REX Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, REX has a market cap of 709.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while REX trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas REX's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to REX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ODC Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ODC has a market cap of 634.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ODC trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ODC's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ODC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to ODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs OEC Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, OEC has a market cap of 627.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while OEC trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas OEC's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OEC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to OEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs KOP Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, KOP has a market cap of 607.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while KOP trades at $30.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas KOP's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to KOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs GPRE Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, GPRE has a market cap of 332.88M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while GPRE trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GPRE's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPRE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to GPRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs HDSN Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, HDSN has a market cap of 330.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while HDSN trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HDSN's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDSN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to HDSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs GEVO Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, GEVO has a market cap of 297.12M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while GEVO trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GEVO's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEVO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to GEVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ADUR Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ADUR has a market cap of 179.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ADUR trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ADUR's P/E ratio is -21.10. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADUR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ADUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs CMT Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, CMT has a market cap of 140.19M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while CMT trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CMT's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to CMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs LWLG Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, LWLG has a market cap of 129.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while LWLG trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LWLG's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LWLG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LWLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs TSE Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, TSE has a market cap of 89.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while TSE trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas TSE's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to TSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs NTIC Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, NTIC has a market cap of 69.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while NTIC trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas NTIC's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NTIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to NTIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs ALTO Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, ALTO has a market cap of 63.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while ALTO trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas ALTO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ALTO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to ALTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs FSI Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, FSI has a market cap of 56.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while FSI trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas FSI's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to FSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs LOOP Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, LOOP has a market cap of 42.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while LOOP trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas LOOP's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LOOP's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to LOOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs VNTR Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, VNTR has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while VNTR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas VNTR's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VNTR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to VNTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs GURE Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, GURE has a market cap of 7.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while GURE trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas GURE's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GURE's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to GURE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs SNES Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, SNES has a market cap of 4.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while SNES trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas SNES's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SNES's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to SNES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs CRKN Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, CRKN has a market cap of 3.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while CRKN trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CRKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRKN's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to CRKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs CNEY Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, CNEY has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while CNEY trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas CNEY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to CNEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs DNMR Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, DNMR has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while DNMR trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas DNMR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNMR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is less volatile compared to DNMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs HGAS Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, HGAS has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while HGAS trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HGAS's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGAS's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to HGAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs HGASW Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, HGASW has a market cap of 9680.00. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while HGASW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas HGASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HGASW's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RPM is more volatile compared to HGASW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPM.
RPM vs MOOV Comparison
RPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPM stands at 14.69B. In comparison, MOOV has a market cap of 1111.00. Regarding current trading prices, RPM is priced at $114.41, while MOOV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPM currently has a P/E ratio of 22.93, whereas MOOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPM's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RPM has daily volatility of 1.61 and MOOV has daily volatility of N/A.