Route Mobile Limited
Route Mobile Limited (ROUTE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROUTE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROUTE.NS | ₹500.80 | -1.10% | 31.7B | 17.03 | ₹29.57 | +2.18% |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,937.10 | +2.85% | 11.6T | 42.87 | ₹44.45 | +0.84% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,938.70 | +2.94% | 11.6T | 42.86 | ₹44.44 | +0.84% |
| IDEA.BO | ₹12.89 | -0.62% | 1.4T | -4.93 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹12.97 | +0.00% | 1.4T | -4.92 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹431.00 | +2.00% | 1.1T | 15.91 | ₹27.07 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹431.95 | +2.27% | 1.1T | 15.87 | ₹27.11 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,591.60 | +5.42% | 781.2B | 45.00 | ₹34.72 | +0.64% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,669.20 | +0.75% | 479B | 31.12 | ₹54.00 | +1.49% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,658.10 | +0.12% | 478.8B | 45.86 | ₹36.63 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
ROUTE.NS vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,937.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,938.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.86. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs IDEA.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs IDEA.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹431.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹431.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 781.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,591.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 479B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,669.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 478.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,658.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹318.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TTML.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while TTML.BO trades at ₹41.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -38.28. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TTML.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TTML.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while TTML.NS trades at ₹41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -38.19. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TTML.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs ROUTE.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹502.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs SUBEX.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs MTNL.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs MTNL.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs SUYOG.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹756.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹53.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs RCOM.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, RCOM.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while RCOM.NS trades at ₹0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCOM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to RCOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check RCOM.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs GTL.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while GTL.BO trades at ₹7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check GTL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs GTL.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while GTL.NS trades at ₹7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check GTL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs STML.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 599.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while STML.BO trades at ₹62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -74.70. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check STML.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 226.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is -53.17. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is -55.10. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs CISTRO.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs KDL.BO Comparison May 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 31.7B. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹500.80, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check KDL.BO's competition here