Cistro Telelink Limited (CISTRO.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CISTRO.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CISTRO.BO | ₹1.07 | +0.00% | 33M | -8.23 | -₹0.13 | N/A |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,798.95 | -1.07% | 11T | 40.58 | ₹44.33 | +0.89% |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,798.20 | -1.14% | 11T | 40.45 | ₹44.45 | +0.89% |
| IDEA.BO | ₹14.97 | +0.27% | 1.6T | 4.66 | ₹3.21 | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹14.95 | +0.13% | 1.6T | 4.66 | ₹3.21 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹429.65 | -0.19% | 1.1T | 15.87 | ₹27.08 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹429.50 | -0.20% | 1.1T | 15.84 | ₹27.11 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,480.50 | -0.59% | 740.3B | 42.65 | ₹34.71 | +0.68% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,972.85 | -0.55% | 562.3B | 36.53 | ₹54.00 | +1.27% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,972.70 | -0.66% | 562.2B | 53.99 | ₹36.54 | +1.27% |
Stock Comparison
CISTRO.BO vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11T. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,798.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11T. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,798.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.45. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs IDEA.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs IDEA.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹429.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹429.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 740.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,480.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 562.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,972.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 36.53. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 562.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,972.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 53.99. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹313.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹312.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs TTML.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while TTML.NS trades at ₹46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -41.96. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check TTML.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs TTML.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while TTML.BO trades at ₹46.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -41.95. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check TTML.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs ROUTE.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, ROUTE.NS has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while ROUTE.NS trades at ₹525.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas ROUTE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ROUTE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to ROUTE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check ROUTE.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs ROUTE.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹525.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs SUBEX.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs MTNL.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs MTNL.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs SUYOG.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹736.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is -47.35. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is -47.20. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs RCOM.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, RCOM.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while RCOM.NS trades at ₹0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas RCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RCOM.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to RCOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check RCOM.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs GTL.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while GTL.BO trades at ₹8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check GTL.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs GTL.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while GTL.NS trades at ₹8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check GTL.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs STML.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 653.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while STML.BO trades at ₹67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -81.33. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check STML.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 398.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -7.82. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is -50.83. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 89.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is -55.15. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO is less volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CISTRO.BO.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
CISTRO.BO vs KDL.BO Comparison June 2026
CISTRO.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CISTRO.BO stands at 33M. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CISTRO.BO is priced at ₹1.07, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CISTRO.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -8.23, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CISTRO.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CISTRO.BO and KDL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDL.BO's competition here