Reliance Communications Limited (RCOM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RCOM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCOM.NS | ₹0.90 | -1.10% | 2.5B | -0.02 | -₹40.54 | N/A |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,910.40 | +1.89% | 11.6T | 42.10 | ₹45.38 | +0.84% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,910.10 | +1.81% | 11.6T | 43.20 | ₹44.22 | +0.84% |
| E1AIRTELPP.NS | ₹1,061.30 | -0.18% | 6.2T | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹14.25 | -1.59% | 1.5T | -6.58 | -₹2.17 | N/A |
| IDEA.BO | ₹14.26 | -1.66% | 1.5T | -5.90 | -₹2.42 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹383.40 | -0.09% | 1T | 14.15 | ₹27.09 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹383.30 | -0.12% | 1T | 14.15 | ₹27.08 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,454.10 | +0.94% | 727.1B | 40.15 | ₹36.22 | +0.69% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,906.70 | -1.62% | 543.4B | 54.40 | ₹35.05 | +0.92% |
Stock Comparison
RCOM.NS vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11.6T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,910.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.10. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11.6T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,910.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs E1AIRTELPP.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, E1AIRTELPP.NS has a market cap of 6.2T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while E1AIRTELPP.NS trades at ₹1,061.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas E1AIRTELPP.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to E1AIRTELPP.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RCOM.NS has daily volatility of 2.20 and E1AIRTELPP.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check E1AIRTELPP.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs IDEA.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs IDEA.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹383.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹383.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 727.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,454.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 543.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,906.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 543.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,905.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹314.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹314.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TTML.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while TTML.NS trades at ₹42.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -42.30. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TTML.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs TTML.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while TTML.BO trades at ₹42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -38.87. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check TTML.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ROUTE.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹553.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ROUTE.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ROUTE.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while ROUTE.NS trades at ₹553.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ROUTE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROUTE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to ROUTE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ROUTE.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs SUBEX.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs MTNL.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs MTNL.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs SUYOG.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹876.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 72.77. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹79.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is -75.81. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹80.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is -75.86. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs GTL.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while GTL.NS trades at ₹7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check GTL.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs GTL.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while GTL.BO trades at ₹7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check GTL.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs STML.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 629M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while STML.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check STML.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 393.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
RCOM.NS vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is 383.67. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is less volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs CISTRO.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -243.18. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
RCOM.NS vs KDL.BO Comparison July 2026
RCOM.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCOM.NS stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCOM.NS is priced at ₹0.90, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCOM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCOM.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCOM.NS is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCOM.NS.Check KDL.BO's competition here