Route Mobile Limited
Route Mobile Limited (ROUTE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROUTE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROUTE.NS | ₹447.65 | -6.15% | 29.5B | 15.83 | ₹29.56 | +2.35% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,799.50 | -1.62% | 10.5T | 36.44 | ₹50.67 | +0.87% |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,797.70 | -1.60% | 10.5T | 36.48 | ₹50.61 | +0.87% |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹416.60 | -2.36% | 1.1T | 16.05 | ₹27.07 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹419.00 | -1.83% | 1.1T | 16.05 | ₹27.07 | N/A |
| IDEA.BO | ₹8.99 | +0.56% | 1T | -3.56 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹8.93 | -0.11% | 1T | -3.55 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,535.50 | -3.51% | 792.1B | 45.18 | ₹35.06 | +0.63% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,382.10 | -4.10% | 404.8B | 26.30 | ₹54.00 | +1.76% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,376.30 | -4.48% | 403.8B | 26.22 | ₹54.03 | +1.76% |
Stock Comparison
ROUTE.NS vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 10.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,799.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 10.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,797.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 36.48. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹416.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs IDEA.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs IDEA.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 792.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,535.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.18. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 404.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,382.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 403.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,376.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹261.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹263.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TTML.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while TTML.BO trades at ₹34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TTML.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs TTML.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while TTML.NS trades at ₹34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check TTML.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs ROUTE.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹450.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs SUBEX.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs MTNL.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹24.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs MTNL.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs SUYOG.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹652.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹47.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs RCOM.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RCOM.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while RCOM.NS trades at ₹0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas RCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCOM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to RCOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check RCOM.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs GTL.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while GTL.NS trades at ₹6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check GTL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs GTL.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while GTL.BO trades at ₹6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check GTL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs STML.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 619.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while STML.BO trades at ₹69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -77.11. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check STML.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 390M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -6.28. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is less volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs CISTRO.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
ROUTE.NS vs KDL.BO Comparison March 2026
ROUTE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.NS stands at 29.5B. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.NS is priced at ₹447.65, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 15.83, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.NS is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.NS.Check KDL.BO's competition here