Route Mobile Limited
Route Mobile Limited (ROUTE.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROUTE.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROUTE.BO | ₹494.80 | -4.05% | 32.2B | 17.29 | ₹29.55 | +2.16% |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,941.00 | -1.84% | 11.4T | 39.54 | ₹50.51 | +0.80% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,940.70 | -1.87% | 11.4T | 39.51 | ₹50.55 | +0.80% |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹469.90 | -0.94% | 1.2T | 17.43 | ₹27.09 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹470.55 | -0.71% | 1.2T | 17.44 | ₹27.06 | N/A |
| IDEA.BO | ₹10.92 | -2.24% | 1.2T | -4.18 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹10.91 | -2.24% | 1.2T | -4.17 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,653.70 | -2.04% | 848.9B | 48.34 | ₹35.12 | +0.59% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,622.80 | -3.79% | 479.3B | 31.14 | ₹54.00 | +1.49% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,619.10 | -4.20% | 478.8B | 31.11 | ₹54.00 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
ROUTE.BO vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,941.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,940.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹469.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹470.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs IDEA.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs IDEA.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 848.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,653.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 479.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,622.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 478.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,619.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹323.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹323.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs TTML.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while TTML.NS trades at ₹42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check TTML.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs TTML.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while TTML.BO trades at ₹42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check TTML.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs ROUTE.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ROUTE.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while ROUTE.NS trades at ₹494.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ROUTE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROUTE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to ROUTE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check ROUTE.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs SUBEX.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs MTNL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs MTNL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs SUYOG.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹664.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹51.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs RCOM.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, RCOM.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while RCOM.NS trades at ₹0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas RCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCOM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to RCOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check RCOM.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs GTL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while GTL.NS trades at ₹7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check GTL.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs GTL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while GTL.BO trades at ₹7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check GTL.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs STML.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while STML.BO trades at ₹74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -89.16. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check STML.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 93.27. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is less volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs CISTRO.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -16.24. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
ROUTE.BO vs KDL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROUTE.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROUTE.BO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROUTE.BO is priced at ₹494.80, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROUTE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROUTE.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROUTE.BO is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROUTE.BO.Check KDL.BO's competition here