What are the top competitors of ROOT.TO in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of ROOT.TO in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE), Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, ROOT.TO or its competitors?

ROOT.TO has a market cap of 127.01M and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: ROOT.TO or its competitors?

ROOT.TO has an EPS of $-0.83, while LULU.NE has an EPS of $0.68. So, ROOT.TO is more profitable compared to LULU.NE.

What is ROOT.TO stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

ROOT.TO has daily volatility of 0.96% as compared to its competitor LULU.NE which is 3%. ROOT.TO is less volatile as compared to competitors and has low risk.

Is ROOT.TO stock profitable?

ROOT.TO has a Return on Equity (ROE) of -0.19%. So, ROOT.TO is more profitable.

What is ROOT.TO stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

ROOT.TO stock has a 52-week high of ($3.28) and a low of ($1.8).

What was the average volume of ROOT.TO stock?

The average volume of ROOT.TO is (9875.00) in terms of investment.

Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO) Competitors

Roots Corporation ROOT.TO Peers

See (ROOT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
ROOT.TO	$3.14	+2.28%	127.01M	-3.78	-$0.83	N/A
LULU.NE	$14.41	+0.84%	55.72B	21.19	$0.68	N/A
ATZ.TO	$66.25	-0.06%	6.27B	37.22	$1.78	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ROOT.TO vs LULU.NE Comparison

ROOT.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROOT.TO stands at 127.01M. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 55.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ROOT.TO is priced at $3.14, while LULU.NE trades at $14.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.78, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, ROOT.TO's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROOT.TO is less volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROOT.TO.

Roots Corporation