What are the top competitors of Roots Corporation in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Roots Corporation in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE), Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Roots Corporation or its competitors?

Roots Corporation has a market cap of 156.1M and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Roots Corporation or its competitors?

Roots Corporation has an EPS of $-0.80, while LULU.NE has an EPS of $0.65. So, Roots Corporation is more profitable compared to LULU.NE.

What is Roots Corporation stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Roots Corporation has daily volatility of 5.94% as compared to its competitor LULU.NE which is 3.37%. Roots Corporation is more volatile as compared to competitors and has high risk.

Is Roots Corporation stock profitable?

Roots Corporation has a Return on Equity (ROE) of -0.21%. So, Roots Corporation is more profitable.

What is Roots Corporation stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Roots Corporation stock has a 52-week high of ($4.05) and a low of ($2.04).

What was the average volume of Roots Corporation stock?

The average volume of Roots Corporation is (12.4K) in terms of investment.

Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO) Competitors

Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (ROOT.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
ROOT.TO	CA$3.94	+1.29%	156.1M	-4.92	-CA$0.80	N/A
LULU.NE	CA$6.79	-2.16%	23.1B	10.45	CA$0.65	N/A
ATZ.TO	CA$114.25	-1.35%	11.1B	38.99	CA$2.93	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

ROOT.TO vs LULU.NE Comparison April 2026

ROOT.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROOT.TO stands at 156.1M. In comparison, LULU.NE has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROOT.TO is priced at CA$3.94, while LULU.NE trades at CA$6.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROOT.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas LULU.NE's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, ROOT.TO's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LULU.NE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROOT.TO is more volatile compared to LULU.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROOT.TO.Check LULU.NE's competition here

Roots Corporation