Rigetti Computing, Inc.
Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RGTIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGTIW | $6.27 | -0.95% | 2.1B | -3.30 | -$1.90 | N/A |
| ANET | $127.35 | -4.10% | 160.4B | 46.31 | $2.75 | N/A |
| WDC | $280.42 | -1.79% | 95.1B | 26.48 | $10.59 | +0.11% |
| STX | $407.40 | -0.90% | 88.8B | 46.09 | $8.84 | +0.70% |
| DELL | $119.15 | -2.55% | 79.9B | 15.62 | $7.63 | +1.72% |
| PSTG | $68.46 | -7.40% | 22.6B | 180.16 | $0.38 | N/A |
| CAJ | $21.63 | N/A | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
| NTAP | $100.53 | -1.90% | 20.1B | 17.51 | $5.74 | +2.03% |
| SMCI | $30.71 | -5.27% | 18.4B | 22.42 | $1.37 | N/A |
| HPQ | $18.36 | -1.26% | 17.2B | 6.93 | $2.65 | +6.35% |
Stock Comparison
RGTIW vs ANET Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 160.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while ANET trades at $127.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 46.31. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check ANET's competition here
RGTIW vs WDC Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while WDC trades at $280.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check WDC's competition here
RGTIW vs STX Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while STX trades at $407.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to STX's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check STX's competition here
RGTIW vs DELL Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while DELL trades at $119.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to DELL's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check DELL's competition here
RGTIW vs PSTG Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while PSTG trades at $68.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 180.16. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check PSTG's competition here
RGTIW vs CAJ Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check CAJ's competition here
RGTIW vs NTAP Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while NTAP trades at $100.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check NTAP's competition here
RGTIW vs SMCI Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while SMCI trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check SMCI's competition here
RGTIW vs HPQ Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while HPQ trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check HPQ's competition here
RGTIW vs LOGI Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while LOGI trades at $89.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check LOGI's competition here
RGTIW vs IONQ Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while IONQ trades at $30.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check IONQ's competition here
RGTIW vs IONQ-WT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while IONQ-WT trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
RGTIW vs QBTS-WT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
RGTIW vs SNDKV Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check SNDKV's competition here
RGTIW vs QBTS Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while QBTS trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check QBTS's competition here
RGTIW vs RGTI Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while RGTI trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check RGTI's competition here
RGTIW vs RCAT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while RCAT trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -25.07. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check RCAT's competition here
RGTIW vs QUBT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while QUBT trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check QUBT's competition here
RGTIW vs MKFG-WT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
RGTIW vs CRCT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 933.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while CRCT trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check CRCT's competition here
RGTIW vs SSYS Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 865.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while SSYS trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check SSYS's competition here
RGTIW vs CRSR Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 575.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while CRSR trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check CRSR's competition here
RGTIW vs NNDM Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while NNDM trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check NNDM's competition here
RGTIW vs BGIN Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while BGIN trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check BGIN's competition here
RGTIW vs DDD Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 265.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while DDD trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check DDD's competition here
RGTIW vs OSS Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while OSS trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -28.34. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check OSS's competition here
RGTIW vs CAN Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 201.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while CAN trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check CAN's competition here
RGTIW vs VELO Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while VELO trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to VELO's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check VELO's competition here
RGTIW vs TIO Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check TIO's competition here
RGTIW vs DM Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check DM's competition here
RGTIW vs VTIX Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while VTIX trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check VTIX's competition here
RGTIW vs AMCI Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while AMCI trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -611.00. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check AMCI's competition here
RGTIW vs MICT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check MICT's competition here
RGTIW vs MKFG Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check MKFG's competition here
RGTIW vs INVE Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while INVE trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check INVE's competition here
RGTIW vs ALOT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while ALOT trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check ALOT's competition here
RGTIW vs YIBO Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while YIBO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check YIBO's competition here
RGTIW vs UAVS Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while UAVS trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check UAVS's competition here
RGTIW vs TACT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while TACT trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check TACT's competition here
RGTIW vs FATH Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check FATH's competition here
RGTIW vs KTCC Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while KTCC trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check KTCC's competition here
RGTIW vs QMCO Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while QMCO trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check QMCO's competition here
RGTIW vs EBON Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while EBON trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check EBON's competition here
RGTIW vs SGE Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check SGE's competition here
RGTIW vs VLD Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to VLD's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check VLD's competition here
RGTIW vs SCKT Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while SCKT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check SCKT's competition here
RGTIW vs ZSPC Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while ZSPC trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 0.33. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check ZSPC's competition here
RGTIW vs VJET Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check VJET's competition here
RGTIW vs STRCW Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check STRCW's competition here
RGTIW vs HILL Comparison February 2026
RGTIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGTIW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGTIW is priced at $6.27, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGTIW currently has a P/E ratio of -3.30, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGTIW's ROE is -1.12%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGTIW is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGTIW.Check HILL's competition here