Reddit, Inc.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GOOG trades at $167.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GOOGL trades at $166.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while META trades at $666.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas META's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SPOT trades at $670.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 105.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while DASH trades at $213.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 270.50. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while BIDU trades at $83.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TME trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while PINS trades at $33.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TWLO trades at $117.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -489.48. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while Z trades at $69.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -197.46. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ZG trades at $68.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -194.29. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SNAP trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.97. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while NBIS trades at $37.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -22.59. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while MTCH trades at $30.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while DJT trades at $21.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while DJTWW trades at $13.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -30.49. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while CARG trades at $31.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 84.89. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while IAC trades at $36.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while YELP trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while WB trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GENI trades at $9.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -49.53. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while DOYU trades at $6.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while NN trades at $11.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GRPN trades at $32.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -32.44. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while FVRR trades at $32.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 68.05. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TBLA trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 89.38. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 984.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while MOMO trades at $6.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 909.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TBLAW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 878.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while EVER trades at $24.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 813.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while OPRA trades at $18.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 811.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while JFIN trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 808.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ANGI trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 744M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ATHM trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 727.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GETY trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while MAX trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 651.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SSTK trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SMWB trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -33.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 598.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while KIND trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 593.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while NNAVW trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 593.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while THRY trades at $13.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 554.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TTGT trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 481M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while PERI trades at $10.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -59.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 414.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while UPXI trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 340.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ZH trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -127.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TRVG trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 243.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while AREN trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 238.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while OB trades at $2.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 197.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SEAT trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -50.67. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ILLRW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 127.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TRUE trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while JOYY trades at $47.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ILLR trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ASST trades at $6.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while BZFD trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while CCG trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GIFT trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while IZEA trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while PODC trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while MNY trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ZDGE trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SCOR trades at $5.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while BODI trades at $3.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SEATW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LCFYW trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -129.87. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while KRKR trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LCFY trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ONFO trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while NAMI trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SLE trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while CRTD trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while CMCM trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 615.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while ONFOW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 231.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while FENG trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 31.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SOGP trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while TC trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.4B. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $110.80, while SOGO trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.20, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.