Reddit, Inc.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GOOGL trades at $174.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GOOG trades at $175.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while META trades at $728.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SPOT trades at $779.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while DASH trades at $240.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 303.34. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while BIDU trades at $85.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TME trades at $19.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while PINS trades at $35.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TWLO trades at $122.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -505.92. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ZG trades at $68.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -193.37. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while Z trades at $70.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -197.77. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SNAP trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.26. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while NBIS trades at $52.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while MTCH trades at $30.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while DJTWW trades at $11.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.58. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while DJT trades at $17.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while CARG trades at $32.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 88.62. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while IAC trades at $37.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GENI trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -54.58. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while WB trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while YELP trades at $34.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while NN trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while DOYU trades at $6.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while MOMO trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GRPN trades at $34.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -33.91. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TBLA trades at $3.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.75. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TBLAW trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while FVRR trades at $29.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 871M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while JFIN trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 861.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while EVER trades at $24.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 836.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while NNAVW trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while OPRA trades at $18.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 778.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ATHM trades at $25.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ANGI trades at $15.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 734.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while MAX trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 721.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GETY trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 655.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SSTK trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 643.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SMWB trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -35.32. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 604.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while KIND trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while THRY trades at $12.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 504.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TTGT trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while PERI trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ZH trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -128.17. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while AREN trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while UPXI trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 259.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TRVG trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 209.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SEAT trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -53.67. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TRUE trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while JOYY trades at $51.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.41. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ILLR trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while BZFD trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while PODC trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ASST trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while CCG trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ZDGE trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while IZEA trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GIFT trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while MNY trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while NAMI trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while BODI trades at $3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SCOR trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SOGP trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SEATW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LCFYW trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -161.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while KRKR trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ONFO trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while CRTD trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SLE trades at $4.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while LCFY trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while CMCM trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while TC trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 590.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 239.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while FENG trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.

RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 26.5B. In comparison, SFUN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $142.44, while SFUN trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 28.79, whereas SFUN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFUN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SFUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.