Reddit, Inc.
Reddit, Inc. RDDT Peers
See (RDDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDDT | $112.81 | +1.44% | 20.82B | 22.61 | $4.99 | N/A |
| GOOG | $160.89 | +0.82% | 1.94T | 17.98 | $8.95 | +0.50% |
| GOOGL | $159.53 | +0.68% | 1.94T | 17.80 | $8.96 | +0.50% |
| META | $656.03 | +2.60% | 1.65T | 25.63 | $25.60 | +0.31% |
| SPOT | $619.99 | -0.13% | 124.57B | 98.26 | $6.31 | N/A |
| DASH | $197.71 | +2.92% | 83.78B | 247.14 | $0.80 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.09B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $91.09 | -0.20% | 32.58B | 10.05 | $9.06 | N/A |
| PINS | $32.93 | +0.27% | 22.31B | 12.33 | $2.67 | N/A |
| TWLO | $114.54 | +3.01% | 17.49B | -498.00 | -$0.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RDDT vs GOOG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 1.94T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GOOG trades at $160.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GOOGL Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 1.94T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GOOGL trades at $159.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs META Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.65T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while META trades at $656.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas META's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SPOT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 124.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SPOT trades at $619.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 98.26. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DASH Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 83.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while DASH trades at $197.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 247.14. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TWTR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BIDU Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 32.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while BIDU trades at $91.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs PINS Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 22.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while PINS trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TWLO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TWLO trades at $114.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -498.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ZG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ZG trades at $69.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -144.25. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs Z Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while Z trades at $70.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -146.44. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SNAP Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SNAP trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs YNDX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TME Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 11.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TME trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NBIS Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while NBIS trades at $35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -25.19. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MTCH Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while MTCH trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DJT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while DJT trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DJTWW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while DJTWW trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -37.06. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs IACVV Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CARG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while CARG trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 167.85. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs IAC Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while IAC trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs YELP Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while YELP trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GENI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GENI trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -54.47. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs WB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while WB trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DOYU Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while DOYU trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs YY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while NN trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NN's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ANGIV Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FVRR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while FVRR trades at $32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 67.47. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TBLA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TBLA trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TBLAW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GRPN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GRPN trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MOMO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while MOMO trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs EVER Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 900.30M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while EVER trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs OPRA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 828.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while OPRA trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ATHM Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 823.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ATHM trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ANGI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 796.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ANGI trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GETY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 746.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GETY trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MAX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 700.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while MAX trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SSTK Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 681.45M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SSTK trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SMWB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 675.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SMWB trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -58.21. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NNAVW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 669.97M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while NNAVW trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs THRY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 652.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while THRY trades at $14.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TTGT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 624.51M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TTGT trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs KIND Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 533.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while KIND trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs PERI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 488.65M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while PERI trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 43.40. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ZH Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 366.70M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ZH trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs AREN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 359.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while AREN trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is -34.36. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AREN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TRVG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 334.48M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TRVG trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs OB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 292.32M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while OB trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SEAT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 270.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SEAT trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -69.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ILLR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 177.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ILLR trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ILLRW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 176.93M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ILLRW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TRUE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 127.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TRUE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs JOYY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 109.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while JOYY trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs JFIN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 88.01M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while JFIN trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ASST Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 86.05M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ASST trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BZFD Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 70.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while BZFD trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CCG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 69.97M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while CCG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BODY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GIFT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 55.03M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GIFT trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs PODC Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 46.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while PODC trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs IZEA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 38.73M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while IZEA trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs EGLX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BODI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 36.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while BODI trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MNY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while MNY trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ZDGE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 31.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ZDGE trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -16.82. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SEATW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SEATW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEATW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SCOR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.93M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SCOR trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LTRPB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.43M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LTRPA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LYL Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs HRYU Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LIZI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs UPXI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 14.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while UPXI trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FAZE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FAZEW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NAMI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 11.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while NAMI trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LKCO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs KRKR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.44M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while KRKR trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LCFYW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 9.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LCFYW trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -86.88. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LCFY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.39M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LCFY trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs QTT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LOV Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ONFO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ONFO trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SLE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SLE trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLE's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ROI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROI's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CRTD Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while CRTD trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CMCM Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while CMCM trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MNYWW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.23M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs STBX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ONFOW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 974205.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while ONFOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SLGG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291828.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FENG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 254241.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while FENG trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SOGP Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 32327.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while SOGP trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TC Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9042.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while TC trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GROM Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8119.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GROMW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 20.82B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2634.00. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $112.81, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.61, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.