Reddit, Inc.
Reddit, Inc. RDDT Peers
See (RDDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDDT | $148.13 | +1.39% | 27.3B | 29.70 | $4.99 | N/A |
| GOOGL | $192.17 | +1.02% | 2.3T | 20.49 | $9.38 | +0.42% |
| GOOG | $193.20 | +0.88% | 2.3T | 20.60 | $9.38 | +0.42% |
| META | $714.80 | +0.17% | 1.8T | 27.94 | $25.58 | +0.29% |
| SPOT | $681.42 | +1.03% | 136.9B | 105.02 | $6.49 | N/A |
| DASH | $243.69 | +1.30% | 103.3B | 308.47 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| TME | $21.23 | -1.58% | 32.5B | 24.98 | $0.85 | +0.84% |
| BIDU | $90.99 | -2.25% | 30.3B | 8.99 | $10.12 | N/A |
| PINS | $37.67 | -0.32% | 25.5B | 13.84 | $2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RDDT vs GOOGL Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GOOGL trades at $192.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GOOG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GOOG trades at $193.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs META Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while META trades at $714.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SPOT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SPOT trades at $681.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 105.02. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DASH Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while DASH trades at $243.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 308.47. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TWTR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TME Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TME trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BIDU Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while BIDU trades at $90.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs PINS Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while PINS trades at $37.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TWLO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TWLO trades at $131.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -548.79. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs Z Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while Z trades at $80.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -229.71. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ZG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ZG trades at $77.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -220.97. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SNAP Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SNAP trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -31.35. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs YNDX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NBIS Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while NBIS trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MTCH Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while MTCH trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DJTWW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while DJTWW trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.05. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DJT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while DJT trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs IACVV Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CARG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while CARG trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 90.89. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs IAC Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while IAC trades at $40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs JOYY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while JOYY trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs DOYU Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while DOYU trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GENI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GENI trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -56.53. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs WB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while WB trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs YELP Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while YELP trades at $35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs YY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while NN trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MOMO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while MOMO trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ANGIV Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GRPN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GRPN trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -33.21. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TBLA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TBLA trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TBLAW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TBLAW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs EVER Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 935.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while EVER trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FVRR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while FVRR trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 54.19. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs JFIN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 845.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while JFIN trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ATHM Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 837.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ATHM trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NNAVW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 832.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while NNAVW trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ANGI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 814.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ANGI trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GETY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GETY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs OPRA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 763.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while OPRA trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MAX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 732.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while MAX trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SMWB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SMWB trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -39.91. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs KIND Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while KIND trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SSTK Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 703.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SSTK trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TTGT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 622M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TTGT trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs THRY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 514.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while THRY trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs PERI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 502.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while PERI trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ZH Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ZH trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -155.83. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs UPXI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while UPXI trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs AREN Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while AREN trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TRVG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 274.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TRVG trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs OB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SEAT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SEAT trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -58.67. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TRUE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TRUE trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ILLR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ILLR trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BZFD Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while BZFD trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ILLRW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ILLRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MNY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while MNY trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs IZEA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while IZEA trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ASST Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ASST trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CCG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while CCG trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ZDGE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ZDGE trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -35.77. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BODY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs PODC Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while PODC trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs EGLX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs BODI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while BODI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SCOR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SCOR trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GIFT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GIFT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs NAMI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while NAMI trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SOGP Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SOGP trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SEATW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SEATW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LTRPA Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LTRPB Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LCFYW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LCFYW trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -146.75. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LYL Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs HRYU Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LIZI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FAZE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FAZEW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LKCO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LCFY Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LCFY trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs KRKR Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while KRKR trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ONFO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ONFO trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs QTT Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs LOV Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SLE Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SLE trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs MNYWW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while MNYWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ROI Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CMCM Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while CMCM trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs CRTD Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while CRTD trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs TC Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while TC trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs STBX Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs ONFOW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 724.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while ONFOW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs SLGG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs FENG Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 262.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while FENG trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GROM Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs GROMW Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.
RDDT vs AUTO Comparison
RDDT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDDT stands at 27.3B. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDDT is priced at $148.13, while AUTO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDDT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.70, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RDDT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDDT is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDDT.