Quantum Computing, Inc.
Quantum Computing, Inc. QUBT Peers
See (QUBT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBT | $18.11 | +7.86% | 2.4B | -32.02 | -$0.54 | N/A |
| ANET | $102.92 | +1.31% | 124.8B | 41.93 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $123.41 | -2.04% | 84.1B | 19.46 | $6.37 | +1.51% |
| STX | $143.26 | +1.82% | 30B | 20.35 | $6.95 | +2.03% |
| SMCI | $49.46 | +0.39% | 28.4B | 25.86 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $24.49 | -0.89% | 23.3B | 9.53 | $2.60 | +4.66% |
| WDC | $64.25 | +1.16% | 22.1B | 21.67 | $2.92 | +0.16% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $106.00 | +1.20% | 21.2B | 18.65 | $5.67 | +1.98% |
| PSTG | $57.65 | +3.65% | 18.1B | 145.79 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QUBT vs ANET Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while ANET trades at $102.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs DELL Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while DELL trades at $123.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs STX Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while STX trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs SMCI Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while SMCI trades at $49.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs HPQ Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while HPQ trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs WDC Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while WDC trades at $64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs CAJ Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs NTAP Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while NTAP trades at $106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs PSTG Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while PSTG trades at $57.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 145.79. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs LOGI Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while LOGI trades at $89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs IONQ Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while IONQ trades at $43.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -26.64. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs IONQ-WT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while IONQ-WT trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs SNDKV Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs QBTS Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while QBTS trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs QBTS-WT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while QBTS-WT trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs RGTI Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while RGTI trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -13.84. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs RGTIW Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while RGTIW trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs CRCT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while CRCT trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs CRSR Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while CRSR trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs MKFG-WT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs SSYS Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 941.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while SSYS trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs RCAT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 705.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while RCAT trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs NNDM Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 355.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while NNDM trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs DDD Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while DDD trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs CAN Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while CAN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs TIO Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs DM Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs MICT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs MKFG Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs OSS Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while OSS trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs YIBO Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while YIBO trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs INVE Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while INVE trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs ZSPC Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while ZSPC trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs ALOT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while ALOT trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs STRC Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs QMCO Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while QMCO trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs TACT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while TACT trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs FATH Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs KTCC Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while KTCC trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs EBON Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while EBON trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs UAVS Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while UAVS trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs SGE Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs VLD Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs SCKT Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while SCKT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs VJET Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.
QUBT vs STRCW Comparison
QUBT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBT stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBT is priced at $18.11, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBT currently has a P/E ratio of -32.02, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QUBT's ROE is -0.39%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBT.