Quadrant Televentures Limited
Quadrant Televentures Limited (QUADRANT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QUADRANT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUADRANT.BO | ₹0.36 | +0.00% | 226.5M | -0.09 | -₹4.25 | N/A |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,988.60 | +0.00% | 11.3T | 39.16 | ₹50.51 | +0.81% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,990.30 | +0.00% | 11.3T | 38.96 | ₹50.70 | +0.81% |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹472.90 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 17.51 | ₹27.09 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹472.50 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 17.51 | ₹27.07 | N/A |
| IDEA.BO | ₹11.27 | +0.00% | 1.2T | -4.25 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹11.26 | +0.00% | 1.2T | -4.24 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,680.40 | +0.00% | 844.1B | 48.12 | ₹35.08 | +0.59% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,654.25 | +0.00% | 481.7B | 31.30 | ₹54.00 | +1.48% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,656.50 | +0.00% | 480.7B | 31.24 | ₹54.00 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
QUADRANT.BO vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,988.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,990.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹472.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹472.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs IDEA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs IDEA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 844.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,680.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 48.12. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 481.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,654.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 480.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,656.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 104.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹328.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs TTML.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while TTML.NS trades at ₹42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check TTML.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs TTML.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while TTML.BO trades at ₹42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check TTML.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs ROUTE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹522.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs ROUTE.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, ROUTE.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while ROUTE.NS trades at ₹522.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ROUTE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROUTE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to ROUTE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check ROUTE.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs SUBEX.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs MTNL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs MTNL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs SUYOG.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹663.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs ONMOBILE.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, ONMOBILE.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while ONMOBILE.NS trades at ₹51.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ONMOBILE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONMOBILE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to ONMOBILE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check ONMOBILE.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹51.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs RCOM.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, RCOM.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while RCOM.NS trades at ₹1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas RCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RCOM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to RCOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check RCOM.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs GTL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while GTL.NS trades at ₹7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check GTL.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs GTL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while GTL.BO trades at ₹7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check GTL.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs STML.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while STML.BO trades at ₹74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -89.16. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check STML.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 91.67. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 100.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is 42.76. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is less volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs CISTRO.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
QUADRANT.BO vs KDL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUADRANT.BO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUADRANT.BO stands at 226.5M. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUADRANT.BO is priced at ₹0.36, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUADRANT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.09, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUADRANT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUADRANT.BO is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUADRANT.BO.Check KDL.BO's competition here