Qutoutiao Inc.
Qutoutiao Inc. QTT Peers
See (QTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTT | $0.18 | -38.43% | 5.6M | -0.10 | -$1.79 | N/A |
| GOOGL | $173.54 | +1.68% | 2.1T | 19.68 | $8.82 | +0.47% |
| GOOG | $174.43 | +1.71% | 2.1T | 19.45 | $8.97 | +0.47% |
| META | $726.09 | +2.46% | 1.8T | 28.37 | $25.59 | +0.28% |
| SPOT | $775.90 | +5.38% | 155.9B | 120.50 | $6.44 | N/A |
| DASH | $239.64 | +2.99% | 101.5B | 303.34 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $86.46 | -0.22% | 29.9B | 8.55 | $10.11 | N/A |
| TME | $18.70 | -0.16% | 29.2B | 22.02 | $0.85 | +0.96% |
| RDDT | $143.95 | +1.60% | 26.5B | 28.79 | $5.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QTT vs GOOGL Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GOOGL trades at $173.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GOOG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GOOG trades at $174.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs META Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while META trades at $726.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SPOT Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 155.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SPOT trades at $775.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs DASH Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while DASH trades at $239.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 303.34. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TWTR Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs BIDU Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while BIDU trades at $86.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TME Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TME trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs RDDT Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while RDDT trades at $143.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs PINS Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while PINS trades at $35.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TWLO Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TWLO trades at $121.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -505.92. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ZG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ZG trades at $67.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -193.37. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs Z Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while Z trades at $69.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -197.77. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs YNDX Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SNAP Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SNAP trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.26. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs NBIS Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while NBIS trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs MTCH Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while MTCH trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs DJTWW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while DJTWW trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.58. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs DJT Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while DJT trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs IACVV Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs CARG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while CARG trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 88.62. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs IAC Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while IAC trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GENI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GENI trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -54.58. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs WB Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while WB trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs YELP Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while YELP trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs YY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs NN Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while NN trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs DOYU Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while DOYU trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs MOMO Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while MOMO trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GRPN Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GRPN trades at $33.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -33.91. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ANGIV Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TBLA Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TBLA trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.75. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TBLAW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TBLAW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs FVRR Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while FVRR trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs JFIN Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 871M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while JFIN trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs EVER Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 861.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while EVER trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs NNAVW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 836.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while NNAVW trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs OPRA Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 836.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while OPRA trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ATHM Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 778.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ATHM trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ANGI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ANGI trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs MAX Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 734.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while MAX trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GETY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 721.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GETY trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SSTK Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 655.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SSTK trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SMWB Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 643.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SMWB trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -35.32. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs KIND Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 604.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while KIND trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs THRY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while THRY trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TTGT Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 504.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TTGT trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs PERI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while PERI trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ZH Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ZH trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -128.17. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs AREN Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 311M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while AREN trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs UPXI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while UPXI trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TRVG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 259.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TRVG trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs OB Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SEAT Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 209.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SEAT trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -53.67. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TRUE Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TRUE trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ILLRW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs JOYY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while JOYY trades at $50.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.41. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ILLR Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ILLR trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs BZFD Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 75.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while BZFD trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs PODC Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while PODC trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -17.07. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ASST Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ASST trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs CCG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while CCG trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs BODY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ZDGE Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ZDGE trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs IZEA Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while IZEA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GIFT Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GIFT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs EGLX Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs MNY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while MNY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs NAMI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while NAMI trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs BODI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while BODI trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SCOR Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SCOR trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SOGP Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SOGP trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SEATW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SEATW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LTRPA Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LTRPB Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LCFYW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LCFYW trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -161.04. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LYL Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs HRYU Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LIZI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs FAZE Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LKCO Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs KRKR Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while KRKR trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LOV Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ONFO Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ONFO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs CRTD Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while CRTD trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SLE Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SLE trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ROI Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs LCFY Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while LCFY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs CMCM Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while CMCM trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs TC Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while TC trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs MNYWW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs STBX Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs FAZEW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs ONFOW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 590.7K. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SLGG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs FENG Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 239.6K. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while FENG trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GROM Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is less volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs GROMW Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.
QTT vs SOGO Comparison
QTT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTT stands at 5.6M. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTT is priced at $0.18, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTT is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTT.