Global Invacom Group Limited (QS9.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

QS9.SI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QS9.SI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, A31.SI has a market cap of 556.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QS9.SI is priced at SGD 0.05, while A31.SI trades at SGD 0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QS9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas A31.SI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QS9.SI's ROE is -0.09%, compared to A31.SI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QS9.SI is less volatile compared to A31.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QS9.SI.Check A31.SI's competition here

QS9.SI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QS9.SI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, 5AB.SI has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QS9.SI is priced at SGD 0.05, while 5AB.SI trades at SGD 0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QS9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas 5AB.SI's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, QS9.SI's ROE is -0.09%, compared to 5AB.SI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QS9.SI is less volatile compared to 5AB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QS9.SI.Check 5AB.SI's competition here

QS9.SI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QS9.SI stands at 15.2M. In comparison, N01.SI has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QS9.SI is priced at SGD 0.05, while N01.SI trades at SGD 0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QS9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of -5.60, whereas N01.SI's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, QS9.SI's ROE is -0.09%, compared to N01.SI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QS9.SI is more volatile compared to N01.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QS9.SI.Check N01.SI's competition here