Global Invacom Group Limited (SES: QS9.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Global Invacom Group Limited (SES: QS9.SI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QS9.SI stands at 8.1M. In comparison, A31.SI has a market cap of 460.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QS9.SI is priced at SGD 0.03 on the SES, while A31.SI trades at SGD 0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QS9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas A31.SI's P/E ratio is 69.44. In terms of profitability, QS9.SI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to A31.SI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QS9.SI is less volatile compared to A31.SI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QS9.SI.Check A31.SI's competition here

Global Invacom Group Limited (SES: QS9.SI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QS9.SI stands at 8.1M. In comparison, 5AB.SI has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QS9.SI is priced at SGD 0.03 on the SES, while 5AB.SI trades at SGD 0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QS9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas 5AB.SI's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, QS9.SI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 5AB.SI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QS9.SI is more volatile compared to 5AB.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QS9.SI.Check 5AB.SI's competition here

Global Invacom Group Limited (SES: QS9.SI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the SES reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QS9.SI stands at 8.1M. In comparison, N01.SI has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QS9.SI is priced at SGD 0.03 on the SES, while N01.SI trades at SGD 0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QS9.SI currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas N01.SI's P/E ratio is -94.71. In terms of profitability, QS9.SI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to N01.SI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QS9.SI is more volatile compared to N01.SI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QS9.SI.Check N01.SI's competition here