Addvalue Technologies Ltd (A31.SI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

A31.SI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, A31.SI stands at 556.2M. In comparison, 5AB.SI has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, A31.SI is priced at SGD 0.14, while 5AB.SI trades at SGD 0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

A31.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 5AB.SI's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, A31.SI's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 5AB.SI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, A31.SI is less volatile compared to 5AB.SI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for A31.SI.Check 5AB.SI's competition here

A31.SI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, A31.SI stands at 556.2M. In comparison, N01.SI has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, A31.SI is priced at SGD 0.14, while N01.SI trades at SGD 0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

A31.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas N01.SI's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, A31.SI's ROE is +0.17%, compared to N01.SI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, A31.SI is more volatile compared to N01.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for A31.SI.Check N01.SI's competition here

A31.SI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, A31.SI stands at 556.2M. In comparison, QS9.SI has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, A31.SI is priced at SGD 0.14, while QS9.SI trades at SGD 0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

A31.SI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QS9.SI's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, A31.SI's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QS9.SI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, A31.SI is more volatile compared to QS9.SI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for A31.SI.Check QS9.SI's competition here