D-Wave Quantum Inc.
D-Wave Quantum Inc. QBTS-WT Peers
See (QBTS-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
QBTS-WT vs QUCCF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, QUCCF has a market cap of 295.12B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while QUCCF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUCCF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to QUCCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to QUCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs ANET Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 109.56B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while ANET trades at $87.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs DELL Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 67.17B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while DELL trades at $96.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CAJPY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CAJPY has a market cap of 29.30B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CAJPY trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJPY's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CAJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CAJPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CAJFF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CAJFF has a market cap of 29.15B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CAJFF trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJFF's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CAJFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CAJFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs HPQ Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.83B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while HPQ trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CAJ Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 21.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs STX Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 20.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while STX trades at $96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs NTAP Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 19.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while NTAP trades at $94.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SMCI Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 18.93B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SMCI trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs PSTG Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 16.02B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while PSTG trades at $48.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 157.97. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs WDC Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 15.46B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while WDC trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs ASUUY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, ASUUY has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while ASUUY trades at $98.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASUUY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to ASUUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ASUUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs LNVGY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, LNVGY has a market cap of 14.66B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while LNVGY trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNVGY's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to LNVGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to LNVGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs LNVGF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, LNVGF has a market cap of 14.51B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while LNVGF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNVGF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to LNVGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to LNVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs LOGI Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while LOGI trades at $81.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs IONQ-WT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 7.94B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while IONQ-WT trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs IONQ Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 7.77B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while IONQ trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -20.45. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SNDKV Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SEKEY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SEKEY has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SEKEY trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEKEY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SEKEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SEKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SEKEF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SEKEF has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SEKEF trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEKEF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SEKEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SEKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs ACEYY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, ACEYY has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while ACEYY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACEYY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to ACEYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ACEYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs QBTS Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while QBTS trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to QBTS's ROE of +45.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs RGTI Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while RGTI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs RGTIW Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while RGTIW trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs FXCOF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, FXCOF has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while FXCOF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCOF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to FXCOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to FXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs TSHTY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, TSHTY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while TSHTY trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSHTY's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to TSHTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs LGNRF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, LGNRF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while LGNRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGNRF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to LGNRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to LGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CRCT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CRCT trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs QUBT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while QUBT trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs MKFG-WT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.50M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SSYS Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 798.94M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SSYS trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CRSR Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 789.41M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CRSR trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs DRSHF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, DRSHF has a market cap of 714.57M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while DRSHF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRSHF's P/E ratio is 81.75. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to DRSHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DRSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs WACMF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, WACMF has a market cap of 585.63M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while WACMF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WACMF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to WACMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to WACMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs JFEYF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, JFEYF has a market cap of 584.79M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while JFEYF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFEYF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to JFEYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to JFEYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs WACMY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, WACMY has a market cap of 524.60M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while WACMY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WACMY's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to WACMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to WACMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs RCAT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 515.94M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while RCAT trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs PCPPF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, PCPPF has a market cap of 384.03M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while PCPPF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCPPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to PCPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to PCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs DDD Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 304.98M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while DDD trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to DDD's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs NNDM Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 260.22M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while NNDM trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CAN Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 186.90M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CAN trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs ZSPC Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 175.03M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while ZSPC trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs TIO Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.95M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs DM Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.37M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs AOMUF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, AOMUF has a market cap of 153.76M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while AOMUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOMUF's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to AOMUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to AOMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs MICT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118.01M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to MICT's ROE of -40.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs MKFG Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.34M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SCTQ Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SCTQ has a market cap of 98.07M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SCTQ trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTQ's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SCTQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SCTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs FRIIF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, FRIIF has a market cap of 79.44M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while FRIIF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRIIF's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to FRIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to FRIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs XAARF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, XAARF has a market cap of 76.54M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while XAARF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XAARF's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to XAARF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to XAARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs INVE Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 75.44M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while INVE trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs QMCO Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 74.73M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while QMCO trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs ALOT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 68.81M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while ALOT trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs YIBO Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 67.06M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while YIBO trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs STRC Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.66M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to STRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs TBIIF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, TBIIF has a market cap of 62.63M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while TBIIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBIIF's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to TBIIF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs OSS Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 53.42M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while OSS trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs TAKOF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, TAKOF has a market cap of 51.07M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while TAKOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAKOF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to TAKOF's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TAKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CREAF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CREAF has a market cap of 47.87M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CREAF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREAF's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CREAF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs TACT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 35.13M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while TACT trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs FATH Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.68M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs AOTOF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, AOTOF has a market cap of 33.07M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while AOTOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOTOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to AOTOF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to AOTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs PRWYF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, PRWYF has a market cap of 28.44M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while PRWYF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRWYF's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to PRWYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to PRWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs EBON Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 24.54M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while EBON trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs KTCC Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 24.43M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while KTCC trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs AITX Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, AITX has a market cap of 21.25M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while AITX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AITX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to AITX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to AITX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SGE Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs UAVS Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 11.87M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while UAVS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs VLD Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to VLD's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs EVRC Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, EVRC has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while EVRC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVRC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to EVRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to EVRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SCKT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.70M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SCKT trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs VJET Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.85M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CCUR Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CCUR has a market cap of 5.53M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CCUR trades at $1,876.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCUR's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CCUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CCUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs VIDE Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, VIDE has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while VIDE trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIDE's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to VIDE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs VRTK Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, VRTK has a market cap of 3.49M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while VRTK trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRTK's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to VRTK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VRTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs FNTTF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, FNTTF has a market cap of 3.43M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while FNTTF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNTTF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to FNTTF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to FNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs TKSTF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, TKSTF has a market cap of 2.04M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while TKSTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKSTF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to TKSTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TKSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs STRCW Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs JLMKF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, JLMKF has a market cap of 919322.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while JLMKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLMKF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to JLMKF's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to JLMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs YRLLF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, YRLLF has a market cap of 632116.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while YRLLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRLLF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to YRLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to YRLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs ITOX Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, ITOX has a market cap of 504284.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while ITOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITOX's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to ITOX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ITOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs DDDX Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, DDDX has a market cap of 434614.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while DDDX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDDX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to DDDX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DDDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs DWDZF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, DWDZF has a market cap of 204960.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while DWDZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWDZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to DWDZF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to DWDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CRTG Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CRTG has a market cap of 179869.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CRTG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CRTG's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to CRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs HAUP Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, HAUP has a market cap of 123488.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while HAUP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to HAUP's ROE of +92.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to HAUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs GOSY Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, GOSY has a market cap of 82500.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while GOSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOSY's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to GOSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to GOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs EUOT Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, EUOT has a market cap of 47963.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while EUOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to EUOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to EUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs RDRSF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, RDRSF has a market cap of 17721.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while RDRSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDRSF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to RDRSF's ROE of +2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to RDRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SNIOF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SNIOF has a market cap of 11252.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SNIOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNIOF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SNIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to SNIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs NADA Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, NADA has a market cap of 10437.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while NADA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NADA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to NADA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to NADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs VMRI Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, VMRI has a market cap of 6957.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while VMRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to VMRI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to VMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs CBEX Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, CBEX has a market cap of 2343.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while CBEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBEX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to CBEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs VOIS Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, VOIS has a market cap of 1777.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while VOIS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to VOIS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to VOIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs MCZAF Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, MCZAF has a market cap of 735.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while MCZAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCZAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to MCZAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to MCZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs SOSO Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, SOSO has a market cap of 389.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while SOSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to SOSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to SOSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs MDEA Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, MDEA has a market cap of 132.00. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while MDEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to MDEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to MDEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
QBTS-WT vs IWRS Comparison
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 3.72B. In comparison, IWRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $5.86, while IWRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is +45.17%, compared to IWRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to IWRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUCCF | $12.25 | -15.58% | 295.12B | 10.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| ANET | $87.26 | +0.93% | 109.56B | 36.82 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $96.25 | +0.48% | 67.17B | 16.10 | $5.98 | +1.92% |
| CAJPY | $31.51 | +0.13% | 29.30B | 27.40 | $1.15 | +2.95% |
| CAJFF | $31.53 | +7.48% | 29.15B | 27.66 | $1.14 | +3.09% |
| HPQ | $26.34 | +1.90% | 24.83B | 9.47 | $2.78 | +4.26% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | N/A | 21.97B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| STX | $96.30 | +0.89% | 20.44B | 13.86 | $6.95 | +2.93% |
| NTAP | $94.44 | +1.53% | 19.49B | 17.49 | $5.40 | +2.19% |
| SMCI | $31.89 | -4.75% | 18.93B | 13.87 | $2.30 | N/A |