D-Wave Quantum Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for QBTS-WT
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for QBTS-WT
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBTS-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS-WT | $21.62 | -4.29% | 7.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ANET | $126.68 | +1.47% | 159.5B | 46.07 | $2.75 | N/A |
| DELL | $174.34 | +2.93% | 117.7B | 20.11 | $8.67 | +1.20% |
| WDC | $294.97 | -0.93% | 100B | 27.91 | $10.57 | +0.15% |
| STX | $429.36 | +1.47% | 93.6B | 48.57 | $8.84 | +0.68% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
| PSTG | $62.48 | +2.31% | 20.6B | 113.60 | $0.55 | N/A |
| NTAP | $103.35 | +1.28% | 20.5B | 17.34 | $5.96 | +2.01% |
| HPQ | $19.51 | +2.96% | 17.9B | 7.39 | $2.64 | +6.04% |
| SMCI | $23.22 | +3.15% | 13.9B | 16.95 | $1.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QBTS-WT vs ANET Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while ANET trades at $126.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check ANET's competition here
QBTS-WT vs DELL Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while DELL trades at $174.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DELL's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check DELL's competition here
QBTS-WT vs WDC Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while WDC trades at $294.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check WDC's competition here
QBTS-WT vs STX Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while STX trades at $429.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 48.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to STX's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check STX's competition here
QBTS-WT vs CAJ Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check CAJ's competition here
QBTS-WT vs PSTG Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while PSTG trades at $62.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 113.60. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check PSTG's competition here
QBTS-WT vs NTAP Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while NTAP trades at $103.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check NTAP's competition here
QBTS-WT vs HPQ Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while HPQ trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HPQ's ROE of +11.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check HPQ's competition here
QBTS-WT vs SMCI Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while SMCI trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check SMCI's competition here
QBTS-WT vs LOGI Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while LOGI trades at $91.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check LOGI's competition here
QBTS-WT vs IONQ Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while IONQ trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check IONQ's competition here
QBTS-WT vs SNDKV Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check SNDKV's competition here
QBTS-WT vs IONQ-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while IONQ-WT trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs QBTS Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while QBTS trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check QBTS's competition here
QBTS-WT vs RGTI Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while RGTI trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -20.27. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check RGTI's competition here
QBTS-WT vs RGTIW Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while RGTIW trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check RGTIW's competition here
QBTS-WT vs INFQ Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while INFQ trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check INFQ's competition here
QBTS-WT vs RCAT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while RCAT trades at $12.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -17.73. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check RCAT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs MKFG-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs QUBT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 937.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while QUBT trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -62.45. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check QUBT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs CRCT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 846.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while CRCT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check CRCT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs SSYS Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 686.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while SSYS trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check SSYS's competition here
QBTS-WT vs CRSR Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 600.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while CRSR trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -46.92. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check CRSR's competition here
QBTS-WT vs NNDM Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 360.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while NNDM trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check NNDM's competition here
QBTS-WT vs BGIN Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 342.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while BGIN trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check BGIN's competition here
QBTS-WT vs DDD Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 270.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while DDD trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check DDD's competition here
QBTS-WT vs VELO Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while VELO trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VELO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check VELO's competition here
QBTS-WT vs CAN Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 196.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while CAN trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check CAN's competition here
QBTS-WT vs OSS Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 189M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while OSS trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -54.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OSS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check OSS's competition here
QBTS-WT vs TIO Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check TIO's competition here
QBTS-WT vs DM Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check DM's competition here
QBTS-WT vs VTIX Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while VTIX trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -19.45. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check VTIX's competition here
QBTS-WT vs AMCI Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while AMCI trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -598.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check AMCI's competition here
QBTS-WT vs MICT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check MICT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs MKFG Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check MKFG's competition here
QBTS-WT vs INVE Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while INVE trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check INVE's competition here
QBTS-WT vs ALOT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while ALOT trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check ALOT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs YIBO Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while YIBO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check YIBO's competition here
QBTS-WT vs UAVS Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while UAVS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check UAVS's competition here
QBTS-WT vs QMCO Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while QMCO trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check QMCO's competition here
QBTS-WT vs TACT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while TACT trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check TACT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs FATH Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check FATH's competition here
QBTS-WT vs KTCC Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while KTCC trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check KTCC's competition here
QBTS-WT vs SGE Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check SGE's competition here
QBTS-WT vs EBON Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while EBON trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check EBON's competition here
QBTS-WT vs VLD Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VLD's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check VLD's competition here
QBTS-WT vs VLD-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VLD-WT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while VLD-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VLD-WT's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VLD-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check VLD-WT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs SCKT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while SCKT trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check SCKT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs VJET Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check VJET's competition here
QBTS-WT vs ZSPC Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while ZSPC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check ZSPC's competition here
QBTS-WT vs STRCW Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check STRCW's competition here
QBTS-WT vs HILL Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check HILL's competition here
QBTS-WT vs FATH-WT Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, FATH-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while FATH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FATH-WT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to FATH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check FATH-WT's competition here
QBTS-WT vs LXK Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, LXK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while LXK trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LXK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to LXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check LXK's competition here
QBTS-WT vs VMEM Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, VMEM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while VMEM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VMEM's ROE of +5.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to VMEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check VMEM's competition here
QBTS-WT vs XPLR Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, XPLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while XPLR trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to XPLR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to XPLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check XPLR's competition here
QBTS-WT vs QLGC Comparison April 2026
QBTS-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBTS-WT stands at 7.5B. In comparison, QLGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QBTS-WT is priced at $21.62, while QLGC trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBTS-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBTS-WT's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QLGC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBTS-WT is more volatile compared to QLGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBTS-WT.Check QLGC's competition here