PT Perusahaan Gas Negara Tbk
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara Tbk (PPAAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PPAAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Gas Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPAAF | $0.11 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 10.50 | $0.01 | +10.58% |
| GASNY | $6.28 | +0.32% | 30.2B | 12.82 | $0.49 | +5.55% |
| GASNF | $31.03 | +0.00% | 29.8B | 12.82 | $2.42 | +5.67% |
| SNMRF | $6.05 | +0.00% | 20.3B | 12.87 | $0.47 | +5.12% |
| SNMRY | $11.56 | +0.78% | 19.4B | 12.18 | $0.95 | +4.05% |
| HOKCF | $0.86 | +0.00% | 16B | 21.50 | $0.04 | +5.20% |
| HOKCY | $0.86 | -2.72% | 16B | 21.40 | $0.04 | +5.31% |
| GAILF | $10.80 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 8.06 | $1.34 | +4.17% |
| TKGSF | $33.00 | +6.11% | 12.2B | 25.58 | $1.29 | +1.74% |
| TKGSY | $16.71 | +1.49% | 12.2B | 25.70 | $0.65 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
PPAAF vs GASNY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GASNY has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while GASNY trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas GASNY's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GASNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to GASNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check GASNY's competition here
PPAAF vs GASNF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GASNF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while GASNF trades at $31.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas GASNF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GASNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to GASNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check GASNF's competition here
PPAAF vs SNMRF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNMRF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while SNMRF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas SNMRF's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNMRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to SNMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check SNMRF's competition here
PPAAF vs SNMRY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SNMRY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while SNMRY trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas SNMRY's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNMRY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to SNMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check SNMRY's competition here
PPAAF vs HOKCF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HOKCF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while HOKCF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas HOKCF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOKCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to HOKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check HOKCF's competition here
PPAAF vs HOKCY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, HOKCY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while HOKCY trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas HOKCY's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOKCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to HOKCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check HOKCY's competition here
PPAAF vs GAILF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GAILF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while GAILF trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas GAILF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GAILF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to GAILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check GAILF's competition here
PPAAF vs TKGSF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKGSF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while TKGSF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas TKGSF's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to TKGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check TKGSF's competition here
PPAAF vs TKGSY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TKGSY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while TKGSY trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas TKGSY's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKGSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to TKGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check TKGSY's competition here
PPAAF vs OSGSY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OSGSY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while OSGSY trades at $50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas OSGSY's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSGSY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to OSGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check OSGSY's competition here
PPAAF vs XNGSF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XNGSF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while XNGSF trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas XNGSF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XNGSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to XNGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check XNGSF's competition here
PPAAF vs PNAGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PNAGF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while PNAGF trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas PNAGF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNAGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to PNAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check PNAGF's competition here
PPAAF vs XNGSY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, XNGSY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while XNGSY trades at $32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas XNGSY's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XNGSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to XNGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check XNGSY's competition here
PPAAF vs OSGSF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, OSGSF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while OSGSF trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas OSGSF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSGSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to OSGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check OSGSF's competition here
PPAAF vs ATGFF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ATGFF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ATGFF trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ATGFF's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATGFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to ATGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ATGFF's competition here
PPAAF vs ITGGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ITGGF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ITGGF trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ITGGF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITGGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to ITGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ITGGF's competition here
PPAAF vs ENGGY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ENGGY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ENGGY trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ENGGY's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to ENGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ENGGY's competition here
PPAAF vs APAJF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, APAJF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while APAJF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas APAJF's P/E ratio is -123.25. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APAJF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to APAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check APAJF's competition here
PPAAF vs CRGGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CRGGF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CRGGF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CRGGF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRGGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to CRGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CRGGF's competition here
PPAAF vs CGHLY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CGHLY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CGHLY trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CGHLY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to CGHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CGHLY's competition here
PPAAF vs CGASY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CGASY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CGASY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CGASY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGASY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to CGASY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CGASY's competition here
PPAAF vs CGHOF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CGHOF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CGHOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CGHOF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGHOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to CGHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CGHOF's competition here
PPAAF vs ENGH Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ENGH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ENGH trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ENGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to ENGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ENGH's competition here
PPAAF vs ENGGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ENGGF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ENGGF trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ENGGF's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to ENGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ENGGF's competition here
PPAAF vs AGEEF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGEEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while AGEEF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas AGEEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to AGEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check AGEEF's competition here
PPAAF vs THOGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, THOGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while THOGF trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas THOGF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THOGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to THOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check THOGF's competition here
PPAAF vs SRCU Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SRCU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while SRCU trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas SRCU's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRCU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to SRCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check SRCU's competition here
PPAAF vs TGASF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TGASF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while TGASF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas TGASF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGASF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to TGASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check TGASF's competition here
PPAAF vs SUUIF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SUUIF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while SUUIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas SUUIF's P/E ratio is 55.79. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUUIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to SUUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check SUUIF's competition here
PPAAF vs ASCOF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ASCOF has a market cap of 720.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ASCOF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ASCOF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASCOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to ASCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ASCOF's competition here
PPAAF vs NPPGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NPPGF has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while NPPGF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas NPPGF's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPPGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to NPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check NPPGF's competition here
PPAAF vs BJGBF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BJGBF has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while BJGBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas BJGBF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BJGBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to BJGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check BJGBF's competition here
PPAAF vs PPAAY Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PPAAY has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while PPAAY trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas PPAAY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PPAAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to PPAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check PPAAY's competition here
PPAAF vs EVGIF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EVGIF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while EVGIF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas EVGIF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EVGIF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to EVGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check EVGIF's competition here
PPAAF vs CGFEF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CGFEF has a market cap of 79.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CGFEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CGFEF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGFEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to CGFEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CGFEF's competition here
PPAAF vs PTTN Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PTTN has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while PTTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas PTTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to PTTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check PTTN's competition here
PPAAF vs CHNGQ Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHNGQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CHNGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CHNGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHNGQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is less volatile compared to CHNGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CHNGQ's competition here
PPAAF vs ALTGF Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ALTGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while ALTGF trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas ALTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALTGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to ALTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check ALTGF's competition here
PPAAF vs CTGSP Comparison July 2025
PPAAF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PPAAF stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CTGSP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PPAAF is priced at $0.11, while CTGSP trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PPAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.50, whereas CTGSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PPAAF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTGSP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PPAAF is more volatile compared to CTGSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PPAAF.Check CTGSP's competition here