Polymac Thermoformers Limited

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,464.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,463.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,393.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 62.15. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,393.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 61.98. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹15,089.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 94.44. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹15,086.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 94.42. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 739.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,494.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SRF.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 739.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,493.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SRF.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 621.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹7,286.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 104.88. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 617.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹7,239.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 104.17. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 546.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹468.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 50.57. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 546.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹468.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.89. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 368.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,357.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 56.26. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 249B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹493.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check HSCL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 248.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹493.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.83. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check HSCL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 194.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,600.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ATUL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 194.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,592.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ATUL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 193.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,361.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 67.58. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 193.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,361.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 67.55. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,226.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 190.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,223.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹203.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹203.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,703.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check BASF.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 160.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,702.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check BASF.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹440.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹440.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹1,180.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 73.12. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AETHER.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 156.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹1,179.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 72.65. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AETHER.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 150.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,907.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 150.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,898.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 146.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,289.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 84.04. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 146.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,288.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.37. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹773.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 54.23. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,985.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,976.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 133.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,291.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 133.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,291.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹3,145.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹3,133.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹285.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PCBL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹285.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PCBL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹665.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹4,004.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹3,985.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹1,885.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 54.98. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹758.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.82. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹757.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 32.77. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,437.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.79. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,434.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹874.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 129.29. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹873.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -111.02. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹4,742.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹4,735.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.14. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,790.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,788.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹971.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹970.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹2,395.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹153.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹152.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹839.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹838.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,511.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 201.55. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,509.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 202.32. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹142.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹142.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹580.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹580.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,238.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check POCL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,236.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check POCL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,139.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,139.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹307.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹307.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.BO has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JINDALPOLY.BO trades at ₹711.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JINDALPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -24.04. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JINDALPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JINDALPOLY.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JINDALPOLY.NS trades at ₹711.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JINDALPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -14.66. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JINDALPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JINDALPOLY.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹67.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,278.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 91.57. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check TATVA.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,275.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 91.27. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check TATVA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, NOCIL.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while NOCIL.NS trades at ₹172.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NOCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.54. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOCIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to NOCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check NOCIL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, NOCIL.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while NOCIL.BO trades at ₹172.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NOCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOCIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to NOCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check NOCIL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,880.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,879.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹254.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 65.20. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹504.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹503.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹886.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 92.26. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹883.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 91.86. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PREMEXPLN.BO trades at ₹501.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PREMEXPLN.BO's P/E ratio is 62.61. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PREMEXPLN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PREMEXPLN.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹501.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, FISCHER.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while FISCHER.BO trades at ₹40.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas FISCHER.BO's P/E ratio is 69.15. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FISCHER.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to FISCHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check FISCHER.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹456.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SIRCA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SIRCA.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹454.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JUBLINDS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JUBLINDS.NS trades at ₹1,633.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JUBLINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUBLINDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JUBLINDS.NS's competition here

POLYMAC.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, POLYMAC.BO stands at 71.4M. In comparison, JUBLINDS.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, POLYMAC.BO is priced at ₹14.93, while JUBLINDS.BO trades at ₹1,623.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

POLYMAC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas JUBLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.31. In terms of profitability, POLYMAC.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JUBLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POLYMAC.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POLYMAC.BO.Check JUBLINDS.BO's competition here