Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See KINGFA.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for KINGFA.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KINGFA.NS | ₹5,813.50 | -0.75% | 78.8B | 41.46 | ₹140.21 | N/A |
| ASIANPAINT.BO | ₹2,640.20 | +0.58% | 2.6T | 53.14 | ₹49.68 | +1.04% |
| ASIANPAINT.NS | ₹2,640.00 | +0.56% | 2.5T | 53.16 | ₹49.66 | +1.04% |
| SOLARINDS.BO | ₹19,907.40 | +1.31% | 1.8T | 90.47 | ₹220.05 | +0.06% |
| SOLARINDS.NS | ₹19,900.00 | +0.71% | 1.8T | 90.18 | ₹220.67 | +0.06% |
| PIDILITIND.BO | ₹1,645.20 | -1.01% | 1.7T | 62.87 | ₹26.17 | +1.00% |
| PIDILITIND.NS | ₹1,649.00 | -0.66% | 1.7T | 63.08 | ₹26.14 | +1.00% |
| SRF.BO | ₹2,576.45 | +0.23% | 770.5B | 35.33 | ₹72.93 | +0.39% |
| SRF.NS | ₹2,571.90 | -0.10% | 762.4B | 35.27 | ₹72.91 | +0.39% |
| BERGEPAINT.NS | ₹524.40 | -0.79% | 611.5B | 48.02 | ₹10.92 | +0.76% |
Stock Comparison
Asian Paints Limited (BSE: ASIANPAINT.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ASIANPAINT.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,640.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 53.14. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here
Asian Paints Limited (NSE: ASIANPAINT.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ASIANPAINT.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 53.16. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here
Solar Industries India Limited (BSE: SOLARINDS.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs SOLARINDS.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹19,907.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 90.47. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here
Solar Industries India Limited (NSE: SOLARINDS.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs SOLARINDS.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹19,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 90.18. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here
Pidilite Industries Limited (BSE: PIDILITIND.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs PIDILITIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,645.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here
Pidilite Industries Limited (NSE: PIDILITIND.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs PIDILITIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 63.08. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here
SRF Limited (BSE: SRF.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs SRF.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 770.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,576.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SRF.BO's competition here
SRF Limited (NSE: SRF.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs SRF.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 762.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,571.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SRF.NS's competition here
Berger Paints India Limited (NSE: BERGEPAINT.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs BERGEPAINT.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 611.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹524.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 48.02. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here
Berger Paints India Limited (BSE: BERGEPAINT.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs BERGEPAINT.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 610.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹524.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here
Linde India Limited (BSE: LINDEINDIA.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs LINDEINDIA.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 569.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹6,674.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 103.96. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here
Linde India Limited (NSE: LINDEINDIA.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs LINDEINDIA.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 569B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹6,672.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 119.61. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here
Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (NSE: FLUOROCHEM.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.NS has a market cap of 507.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while FLUOROCHEM.NS trades at ₹4,621.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas FLUOROCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 80.59. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.NS's competition here
Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (BSE: FLUOROCHEM.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 506.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹4,624.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 80.93. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here
Navin Fluorine International Limited (NSE: NAVINFLUOR.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.NS has a market cap of 420.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while NAVINFLUOR.NS trades at ₹8,206.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas NAVINFLUOR.NS's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.NS's competition here
Navin Fluorine International Limited (BSE: NAVINFLUOR.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 420.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while NAVINFLUOR.BO trades at ₹8,196.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas NAVINFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 52.53. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.BO's competition here
Himadri Speciality Chemical Limited (BSE: HSCL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs HSCL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 330.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹654.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.76. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check HSCL.BO's competition here
Himadri Speciality Chemical Limited (NSE: HSCL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs HSCL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 330.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹654.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check HSCL.NS's competition here
Acutaas Chemicals Ltd. (NSE: ACUTAAS.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ACUTAAS.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 259.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹3,169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 71.45. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here
Acutaas Chemicals Limited (BSE: ACUTAAS.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ACUTAAS.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 259.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹3,168.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 73.62. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here
Aether Industries Limited (BSE: AETHER.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs AETHER.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 215.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹1,626.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 90.99. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AETHER.BO's competition here
Aether Industries Limited (NSE: AETHER.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs AETHER.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 215.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹1,626.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 89.97. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AETHER.NS's competition here
Atul Ltd (BSE: ATUL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ATUL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,507.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ATUL.BO's competition here
Atul Ltd (NSE: ATUL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ATUL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,509.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ATUL.NS's competition here
Aarti Industries Limited (NSE: AARTIIND.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs AARTIIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹527.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here
Aarti Industries Limited (BSE: AARTIIND.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs AARTIIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 190.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹526.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here
BASF India Limited (NSE: BASF.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs BASF.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,902.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check BASF.NS's competition here
BASF India Limited (BSE: BASF.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs BASF.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,900.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check BASF.BO's competition here
Kansai Nerolac Paints Limited (NSE: KANSAINER.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs KANSAINER.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 166.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹205.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here
Kansai Nerolac Paints Limited (BSE: KANSAINER.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs KANSAINER.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹205.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here
Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited (NSE: GRWRHITECH.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs GRWRHITECH.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 165.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹7,123.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here
Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited (BSE: GRWRHITECH.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs GRWRHITECH.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 164.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹7,101.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 42.53. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here
Fine Organic Industries Limited (NSE: FINEORG.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs FINEORG.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹5,159.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here
Fine Organic Industries Limited (BSE: FINEORG.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs FINEORG.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹5,143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here
Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited (NSE: SHAILY.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs SHAILY.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SHAILY.NS has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SHAILY.NS trades at ₹3,321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SHAILY.NS's P/E ratio is 84.98. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHAILY.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to SHAILY.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SHAILY.NS's competition here
Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited (BSE: SHAILY.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs SHAILY.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 152.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹3,321.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 85.18. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here
Anupam Rasayan India Limited (NSE: ANURAS.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ANURAS.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,243.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.19. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here
Anupam Rasayan India Limited (BSE: ANURAS.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ANURAS.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,241.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.06. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here
Vinati Organics Limited (NSE: VINATIORGA.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs VINATIORGA.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,329.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here
Vinati Organics Limited (BSE: VINATIORGA.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs VINATIORGA.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,326.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.97. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here
Privi Speciality Chemicals Limited (BSE: PRIVISCL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs PRIVISCL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹3,478.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here
Akzo Nobel India Limited (NSE: AKZOINDIA.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs AKZOINDIA.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,986.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here
Privi Speciality Chemicals Limited (NSE: PRIVISCL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs PRIVISCL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 135.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹3,479.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here
PCBL Limited (NSE: PCBL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs PCBL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹317.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PCBL.NS's competition here
PCBL Limited (BSE: PCBL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs PCBL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹317.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PCBL.BO's competition here
Jubilant Ingrevia Limited (BSE: JUBLINGREA.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs JUBLINGREA.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹717.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here
Jubilant Ingrevia Limited (NSE: JUBLINGREA.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs JUBLINGREA.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while JUBLINGREA.NS trades at ₹718.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas JUBLINGREA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JUBLINGREA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.NS's competition here
Alkyl Amines Chemicals Limited (BSE: ALKYLAMINE.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹2,053.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 46.38. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here
Alkyl Amines Chemicals Limited (NSE: ALKYLAMINE.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹2,052.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.72. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here
Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited (NSE: SUDARSCHEM.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,215.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 137.30. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here
Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited (BSE: SUDARSCHEM.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 96.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,213.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 123.82. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here
Ami Organics Limited (NSE: AMIORG.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs AMIORG.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here
Ami Organics Limited (BSE: AMIORG.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs AMIORG.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here
Elantas Beck India Limited (BSE: ELANTAS.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ELANTAS.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ELANTAS.BO has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ELANTAS.BO trades at ₹11,535.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ELANTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELANTAS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to ELANTAS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ELANTAS.BO's competition here
Clean Science and Technology Limited (NSE: CLEAN.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs CLEAN.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹825.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here
Clean Science and Technology Limited (BSE: CLEAN.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs CLEAN.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 88.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹825.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 38.62. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here
Galaxy Surfactants Limited (BSE: GALAXYSURF.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs GALAXYSURF.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹2,334.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here
Galaxy Surfactants Limited (NSE: GALAXYSURF.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs GALAXYSURF.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹2,333.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (BSE: KINGFA.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs KINGFA.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹5,807.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.42. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here
Tanfac Industries Limited (BSE: TANFACIND.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs TANFACIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹3,318.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 90.69. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here
Balaji Amines Limited (NSE: BALAMINES.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs BALAMINES.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹2,078.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here
Balaji Amines Limited (BSE: BALAMINES.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs BALAMINES.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹2,077.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 38.22. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here
Neogen Chemicals Limited (NSE: NEOGEN.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs NEOGEN.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹2,230.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 168.69. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here
Neogen Chemicals Limited (BSE: NEOGEN.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs NEOGEN.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹2,223.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 169.07. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here
Fineotex Chemical Limited (NSE: FCL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs FCL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, FCL.NS has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while FCL.NS trades at ₹47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas FCL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FCL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to FCL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check FCL.NS's competition here
Indigo Paints Limited (BSE: INDIGOPNTS.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹1,151.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here
Indigo Paints Limited (NSE: INDIGOPNTS.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹1,151.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here
Yasho Industries Limited (BSE: YASHO.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs YASHO.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, YASHO.BO has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while YASHO.BO trades at ₹4,400.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas YASHO.BO's P/E ratio is 92.01. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YASHO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to YASHO.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check YASHO.BO's competition here
Yasho Industries Limited (NSE: YASHO.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs YASHO.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, YASHO.NS has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while YASHO.NS trades at ₹4,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas YASHO.NS's P/E ratio is 91.99. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YASHO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to YASHO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check YASHO.NS's competition here
Laxmi Organic Industries Limited (NSE: LXCHEM.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs LXCHEM.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹173.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here
Laxmi Organic Industries Limited (BSE: LXCHEM.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs LXCHEM.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹173.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here
Savita Oil Technologies Limited (BSE: SOTL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs SOTL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SOTL.BO has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SOTL.BO trades at ₹677.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOTL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to SOTL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SOTL.BO's competition here
Savita Oil Technologies Limited (NSE: SOTL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs SOTL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, SOTL.NS has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while SOTL.NS trades at ₹677.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas SOTL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOTL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to SOTL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check SOTL.NS's competition here
Vishnu Chemicals Limited (BSE: VISHNU.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs VISHNU.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹629.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here
Vishnu Chemicals Limited (NSE: VISHNU.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs VISHNU.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹629.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here
Responsive Industries Limited (BSE: RESPONIND.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs RESPONIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹155.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here
Responsive Industries Limited (NSE: RESPONIND.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs RESPONIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹155.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here
Pondy Oxides And Chemicals Limited (NSE: POCL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs POCL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while POCL.NS trades at ₹502.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check POCL.NS's competition here
Pondy Oxides And Chemicals Limited (BSE: POCL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs POCL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while POCL.BO trades at ₹500.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check POCL.BO's competition here
Tatva Chintan Pharma Chem Limited (NSE: TATVA.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs TATVA.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,616.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 70.74. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check TATVA.NS's competition here
Tatva Chintan Pharma Chem Limited (BSE: TATVA.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs TATVA.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,616.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 70.72. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check TATVA.BO's competition here
Polyplex Corporation Limited (NSE: POLYPLEX.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs POLYPLEX.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹1,194.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here
Polyplex Corporation Limited (BSE: POLYPLEX.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs POLYPLEX.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹1,192.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here
Styrenix Performance Materials Ltd. (NSE: STYRENIX.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs STYRENIX.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹2,081.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here
Styrenix Performance Materials Limited (BSE: STYRENIX.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs STYRENIX.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹2,084.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here
Premier Explosives Limited (BSE: PREMEXPLN.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs PREMEXPLN.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.BO has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PREMEXPLN.BO trades at ₹665.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PREMEXPLN.BO's P/E ratio is 124.69. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PREMEXPLN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.BO's competition here
Premier Explosives Limited (NSE: PREMEXPLN.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs PREMEXPLN.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹665.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 78.07. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here
Advanced Enzyme Technologies Limited (BSE: ADVENZYMES.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ADVENZYMES.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹299.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here
Advanced Enzyme Technologies Limited (NSE: ADVENZYMES.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ADVENZYMES.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here
Apcotex Industries Limited (BSE: APCOTEXIND.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs APCOTEXIND.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, APCOTEXIND.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while APCOTEXIND.BO trades at ₹625.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas APCOTEXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APCOTEXIND.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to APCOTEXIND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check APCOTEXIND.BO's competition here
Apcotex Industries Limited (NSE: APCOTEXIND.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs APCOTEXIND.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, APCOTEXIND.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while APCOTEXIND.NS trades at ₹625.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas APCOTEXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APCOTEXIND.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is more volatile compared to APCOTEXIND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check APCOTEXIND.NS's competition here
Grauer & Weil (India) Limited (NSE: GRAUWEIL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs GRAUWEIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here
Grauer & Weil (India) Limited (BSE: GRAUWEIL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs GRAUWEIL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹69.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here
Kiri Industries Limited (NSE: KIRIINDUS.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs KIRIINDUS.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.NS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while KIRIINDUS.NS trades at ₹477.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas KIRIINDUS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRIINDUS.NS's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check KIRIINDUS.NS's competition here
Kiri Industries Limited (BSE: KIRIINDUS.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs KIRIINDUS.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while KIRIINDUS.BO trades at ₹477.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas KIRIINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRIINDUS.BO's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check KIRIINDUS.BO's competition here
NOCIL Limited (BSE: NOCIL.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs NOCIL.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, NOCIL.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while NOCIL.BO trades at ₹165.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas NOCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOCIL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to NOCIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check NOCIL.BO's competition here
NOCIL Limited (NSE: NOCIL.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs NOCIL.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, NOCIL.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while NOCIL.NS trades at ₹167.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas NOCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.49. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOCIL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to NOCIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check NOCIL.NS's competition here
Rossari Biotech Limited (NSE: ROSSARI.NS)
KINGFA.NS vs ROSSARI.NS Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹501.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here
Rossari Biotech Limited (BSE: ROSSARI.BO)
KINGFA.NS vs ROSSARI.BO Comparison August 2026
Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited (NSE: KINGFA.NS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KINGFA.NS stands at 78.8B. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KINGFA.NS is priced at ₹5,813.50 on the NSE, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KINGFA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.46, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, KINGFA.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KINGFA.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KINGFA.NS.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here