Dadelo S.A.
Dadelo S.A. (PLDADEL00013.SG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PLDADEL00013.SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLDADEL00013.SG | €10.60 | -8.23% | 133.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | €189.24 | -5.64% | 2.2T | 38.46 | €5.31 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | €12.64 | -1.23% | 261.8B | 16.49 | €0.80 | +0.11% |
| AHLA.F | €101.20 | -1.17% | 260.9B | 16.43 | €6.44 | +0.88% |
| IXD1.DE | €41.24 | -4.69% | 132.4B | 22.63 | €1.88 | +3.07% |
| MLB1.DE | €2,049.00 | -1.75% | 105.4B | 59.00 | €35.24 | N/A |
| 013A.F | €26.75 | -4.12% | 41.1B | 7.78 | €3.56 | +3.17% |
| EBA.DE | €77.27 | +13.67% | 37.1B | 20.63 | €3.90 | +1.32% |
| AHLA.DE | €100.80 | -2.14% | 31.7B | 16.24 | €6.44 | +0.11% |
| DHER.DE | €25.52 | -4.42% | 7.8B | -8.48 | -€3.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PLDADEL00013.SG vs AMZ.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while AMZ.DE trades at €189.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs 2RR.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 261.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while 2RR.F trades at €12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check 2RR.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs AHLA.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 260.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while AHLA.F trades at €101.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check AHLA.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs IXD1.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while IXD1.DE trades at €41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check IXD1.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs MLB1.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while MLB1.DE trades at €2,049.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 59.00. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs 013A.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while 013A.F trades at €26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check 013A.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs EBA.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while EBA.DE trades at €77.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check EBA.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs AHLA.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while AHLA.DE trades at €100.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs DHER.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while DHER.DE trades at €25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check DHER.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs ZAL.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while ZAL.DE trades at €25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs 3E2.BE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while 3E2.BE trades at €50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs 3E2.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while 3E2.F trades at €50.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check 3E2.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs 3E2.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while 3E2.DE trades at €40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs ZO1.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs CEC.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while CEC.DE trades at €4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is -49.33. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check CEC.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs YOU.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while YOU.DE trades at €6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check YOU.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs YOU.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while YOU.F trades at €6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check YOU.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs 8WZ.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs SNH.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check SNH.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs G5NA.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs H24.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check H24.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs BIKE.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 128.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while BIKE.F trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check BIKE.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs BIKE.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs FSNT.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs MRX.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while MRX.DE trades at €2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check MRX.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs MRX.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while MRX.F trades at €1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check MRX.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs ART.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while ART.DE trades at €11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -80.71. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check ART.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs ECF.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while ECF.DE trades at €2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check ECF.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs BBY.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check BBY.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs BTBB.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs U1DA.F Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, U1DA.F has a market cap of 149.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while U1DA.F trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U1DA.F's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to U1DA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to U1DA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check U1DA.F's competition here
PLDADEL00013.SG vs CEC1.DE Comparison August 2025
PLDADEL00013.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PLDADEL00013.SG stands at 133.4M. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PLDADEL00013.SG is priced at €10.60, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PLDADEL00013.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PLDADEL00013.SG is less volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PLDADEL00013.SG.Check CEC1.DE's competition here