MercadoLibre, Inc.
MercadoLibre, Inc. (MLB1.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLB1.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLB1.DE | €1,481.60 | +1.86% | 75.1B | 45.48 | €32.58 | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | €227.45 | -2.59% | 2.4T | 30.90 | €7.36 | N/A |
| AHLA.F | €107.80 | +1.13% | 259.1B | 19.42 | €5.56 | +1.58% |
| 2RR.F | €13.50 | +1.12% | 258.5B | 19.24 | €0.70 | +1.62% |
| AHLA.DE | €108.20 | +1.31% | 252.5B | 19.46 | €5.56 | +1.58% |
| EBA.DE | €93.39 | -1.34% | 41.5B | 25.10 | €3.72 | +1.08% |
| 013A.F | €24.90 | +0.40% | 33.8B | 21.37 | €1.17 | +3.46% |
| DHER.DE | €37.67 | +1.87% | 11.4B | -20.25 | -€1.86 | N/A |
| 3E2.F | €58.20 | +1.01% | 6.2B | 28.12 | €2.07 | N/A |
| ZAL.DE | €22.93 | -1.55% | 5.9B | 27.96 | €0.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLB1.DE vs AMZ.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while AMZ.DE trades at €227.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs AHLA.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 259.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while AHLA.F trades at €107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check AHLA.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 2RR.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 258.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 2RR.F trades at €13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 2RR.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs AHLA.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 252.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while AHLA.DE trades at €108.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs EBA.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while EBA.DE trades at €93.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check EBA.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 013A.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 013A.F trades at €24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 013A.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs DHER.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while DHER.DE trades at €37.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check DHER.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 3E2.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 3E2.F trades at €58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 3E2.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs ZAL.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while ZAL.DE trades at €22.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 3E2.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 3E2.DE trades at €59.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 3E2.BE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 3E2.BE trades at €47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs ZO1.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs CECV.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, CECV.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while CECV.DE trades at €4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CECV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CECV.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to CECV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check CECV.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs CEC.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while CEC.DE trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check CEC.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs YOU.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while YOU.DE trades at €6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check YOU.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs YOU.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while YOU.F trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check YOU.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs DOU.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, DOU.F has a market cap of 954.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while DOU.F trades at €8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DOU.F's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOU.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to DOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check DOU.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs DOU.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, DOU.DE has a market cap of 945.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while DOU.DE trades at €8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas DOU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOU.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to DOU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check DOU.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 8WZ.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 748.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs SNH.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check SNH.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs BIJ.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, BIJ.DE has a market cap of 403.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while BIJ.DE trades at €53.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BIJ.DE's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIJ.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to BIJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check BIJ.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs G5NA.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs H24.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check H24.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs 91N0.SG Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, 91N0.SG has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while 91N0.SG trades at €16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas 91N0.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to 91N0.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to 91N0.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check 91N0.SG's competition here
MLB1.DE vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
MLB1.DE vs BIKE.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs BIKE.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while BIKE.F trades at €2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check BIKE.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs FSNT.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs ART.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check ART.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs MRX.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while MRX.DE trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check MRX.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs MRX.F Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while MRX.F trades at €1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check MRX.F's competition here
MLB1.DE vs ECF.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while ECF.DE trades at €2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -57.60. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check ECF.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs BBY.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check BBY.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs ADD.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check ADD.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs BTBB.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs WDL1.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, WDL1.DE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while WDL1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas WDL1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WDL1.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is more volatile compared to WDL1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check WDL1.DE's competition here
MLB1.DE vs CEC1.DE Comparison June 2026
MLB1.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLB1.DE stands at 75.1B. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLB1.DE is priced at €1,481.60, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLB1.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 45.48, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, MLB1.DE's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MLB1.DE is less volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLB1.DE.Check CEC1.DE's competition here