Dadelo S.A.
Dadelo S.A. (91N0.SG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (91N0.SG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91N0.SG | €16.20 | -2.41% | 189.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | €223.70 | -4.20% | 2.4T | 30.90 | €7.36 | N/A |
| AHLA.F | €114.20 | +7.13% | 259.1B | 19.42 | €5.56 | +1.58% |
| 2RR.F | €14.22 | +6.52% | 258.5B | 19.24 | €0.70 | +1.62% |
| AHLA.DE | €115.00 | +7.68% | 252.5B | 19.46 | €5.56 | +1.58% |
| MLB1.DE | €1,454.00 | -0.04% | 75.1B | 45.48 | €32.58 | N/A |
| EBA.DE | €94.06 | -0.63% | 41.5B | 25.10 | €3.72 | +1.08% |
| 013A.F | €26.15 | +5.44% | 33.8B | 21.37 | €1.17 | +3.46% |
| DHER.DE | €38.33 | +3.65% | 11.4B | -20.25 | -€1.86 | N/A |
| 3E2.F | €58.68 | +1.84% | 6.2B | 28.12 | €2.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
91N0.SG vs AMZ.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while AMZ.DE trades at €223.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs AHLA.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 259.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while AHLA.F trades at €114.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check AHLA.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs 2RR.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 258.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while 2RR.F trades at €14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 2RR.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs AHLA.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 252.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while AHLA.DE trades at €115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs MLB1.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while MLB1.DE trades at €1,454.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 45.48. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs EBA.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while EBA.DE trades at €94.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check EBA.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 013A.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while 013A.F trades at €26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 013A.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs DHER.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while DHER.DE trades at €38.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check DHER.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 3E2.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while 3E2.F trades at €58.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 3E2.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs ZAL.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while ZAL.DE trades at €23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 3E2.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while 3E2.DE trades at €59.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 3E2.BE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while 3E2.BE trades at €47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ZO1.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs CECV.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, CECV.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while CECV.DE trades at €4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CECV.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to CECV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check CECV.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs CEC.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while CEC.DE trades at €4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 400.00. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check CEC.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs YOU.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while YOU.DE trades at €6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check YOU.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs YOU.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while YOU.F trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check YOU.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs DOU.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, DOU.F has a market cap of 954.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while DOU.F trades at €8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOU.F's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOU.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to DOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check DOU.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs DOU.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, DOU.DE has a market cap of 945.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while DOU.DE trades at €8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOU.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to DOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check DOU.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs 8WZ.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 748.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs SNH.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check SNH.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs BIJ.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, BIJ.DE has a market cap of 403.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while BIJ.DE trades at €55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIJ.DE's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIJ.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to BIJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BIJ.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs G5NA.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs H24.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check H24.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
91N0.SG vs BIKE.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs BIKE.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while BIKE.F trades at €2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BIKE.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs FSNT.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ART.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ART.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs MRX.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while MRX.DE trades at €1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check MRX.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs MRX.F Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while MRX.F trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check MRX.F's competition here
91N0.SG vs ECF.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while ECF.DE trades at €2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -57.60. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ECF.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs BBY.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BBY.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs ADD.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check ADD.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs BTBB.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs WDL1.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, WDL1.DE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while WDL1.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDL1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDL1.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is less volatile compared to WDL1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check WDL1.DE's competition here
91N0.SG vs CEC1.DE Comparison June 2026
91N0.SG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 91N0.SG stands at 189.6M. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 91N0.SG is priced at €16.20, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
91N0.SG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 91N0.SG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 91N0.SG is more volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 91N0.SG.Check CEC1.DE's competition here