Alibaba Group Holding Limited
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (2RR.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (2RR.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2RR.F | €13.35 | -1.94% | 255.9B | 19.05 | €0.70 | +1.63% |
| AMZ.DE | €233.50 | +0.89% | 2.5T | 31.86 | €7.33 | N/A |
| AHLA.F | €106.60 | -1.66% | 255.3B | 19.10 | €5.57 | +1.60% |
| AHLA.DE | €106.80 | -0.37% | 249.2B | 19.17 | €5.57 | +1.60% |
| MLB1.DE | €1,454.60 | -0.47% | 73.7B | 44.63 | €32.59 | N/A |
| EBA.DE | €94.66 | -0.02% | 42B | 25.45 | €3.72 | +1.09% |
| 013A.F | €24.80 | -1.20% | 33.4B | 21.15 | €1.17 | +3.48% |
| DHER.DE | €36.98 | -5.18% | 11.2B | -19.88 | -€1.86 | N/A |
| 3E2.F | €57.62 | -0.07% | 6.2B | 27.84 | €2.07 | N/A |
| ZAL.DE | €23.29 | +2.19% | 6B | 28.40 | €0.82 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
2RR.F vs AMZ.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while AMZ.DE trades at €233.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs AHLA.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while AHLA.F trades at €106.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check AHLA.F's competition here
2RR.F vs AHLA.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 249.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while AHLA.DE trades at €106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs MLB1.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while MLB1.DE trades at €1,454.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 44.63. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs EBA.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while EBA.DE trades at €94.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check EBA.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs 013A.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while 013A.F trades at €24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check 013A.F's competition here
2RR.F vs DHER.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while DHER.DE trades at €36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -19.88. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check DHER.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs 3E2.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while 3E2.F trades at €57.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check 3E2.F's competition here
2RR.F vs ZAL.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while ZAL.DE trades at €23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs 3E2.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while 3E2.DE trades at €58.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs 3E2.BE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while 3E2.BE trades at €47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
2RR.F vs ZO1.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs CECV.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, CECV.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while CECV.DE trades at €4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CECV.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CECV.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to CECV.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check CECV.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs CEC.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while CEC.DE trades at €3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is 390.00. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check CEC.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs YOU.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while YOU.DE trades at €6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check YOU.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs YOU.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while YOU.F trades at €6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check YOU.F's competition here
2RR.F vs DOU.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, DOU.F has a market cap of 956.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while DOU.F trades at €8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas DOU.F's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOU.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to DOU.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check DOU.F's competition here
2RR.F vs DOU.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, DOU.DE has a market cap of 941.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while DOU.DE trades at €8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas DOU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOU.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to DOU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check DOU.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs 8WZ.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 761.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
2RR.F vs SNH.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check SNH.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs BIJ.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, BIJ.DE has a market cap of 410.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while BIJ.DE trades at €54.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas BIJ.DE's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIJ.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to BIJ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check BIJ.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs G5NA.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -6.79%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs H24.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check H24.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs 91N0.SG Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, 91N0.SG has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while 91N0.SG trades at €16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas 91N0.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 91N0.SG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to 91N0.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check 91N0.SG's competition here
2RR.F vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 155.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
2RR.F vs BIKE.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while BIKE.DE trades at €3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -23.15. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs BIKE.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while BIKE.F trades at €3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check BIKE.F's competition here
2RR.F vs FSNT.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs ART.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check ART.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs MRX.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while MRX.DE trades at €1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check MRX.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs MRX.F Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, MRX.F has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while MRX.F trades at €1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas MRX.F's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRX.F's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is more volatile compared to MRX.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check MRX.F's competition here
2RR.F vs ECF.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while ECF.DE trades at €2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check ECF.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs BBY.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check BBY.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs ADD.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, ADD.DE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while ADD.DE trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas ADD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADD.DE's ROE of -137.53%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to ADD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check ADD.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs BTBB.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs WDL1.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, WDL1.DE has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while WDL1.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas WDL1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDL1.DE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to WDL1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check WDL1.DE's competition here
2RR.F vs CEC1.DE Comparison June 2026
2RR.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 2RR.F stands at 255.9B. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, 2RR.F is priced at €13.35, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
2RR.F currently has a P/E ratio of 19.05, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, 2RR.F's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, 2RR.F is less volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 2RR.F.Check CEC1.DE's competition here