Pinterest, Inc.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GOOGL trades at $192.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GOOG trades at $193.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while META trades at $714.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SPOT trades at $681.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 105.02. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while DASH trades at $243.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 308.47. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TME trades at $21.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while BIDU trades at $90.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while RDDT trades at $148.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 29.70. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TWLO trades at $131.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -548.79. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while Z trades at $80.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -229.71. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ZG trades at $77.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -220.97. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SNAP trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -31.35. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while NBIS trades at $52.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -31.61. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while MTCH trades at $34.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while DJTWW trades at $11.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.05. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while DJT trades at $19.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while CARG trades at $33.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 90.89. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while IAC trades at $40.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while JOYY trades at $52.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while DOYU trades at $8.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GENI trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -56.53. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while WB trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while YELP trades at $35.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while NN trades at $15.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while MOMO trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GRPN trades at $33.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -33.21. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TBLA trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TBLAW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 935.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while EVER trades at $25.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while FVRR trades at $26.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 54.19. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 845.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while JFIN trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 837.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ATHM trades at $28.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 832.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while NNAVW trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 814.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ANGI trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 797.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GETY trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.72. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 763.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while OPRA trades at $17.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 732.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while MAX trades at $10.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SMWB trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -39.91. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while KIND trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 703.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SSTK trades at $19.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 622M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TTGT trades at $8.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 514.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while THRY trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 502.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while PERI trades at $11.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ZH trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -155.83. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while UPXI trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while AREN trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 274.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TRVG trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SEAT trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -58.67. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TRUE trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ILLR trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while BZFD trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ILLRW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while MNY trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while IZEA trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ASST trades at $4.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while CCG trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ZDGE trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -35.77. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while PODC trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while BODI trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SCOR trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GIFT trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while NAMI trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SOGP trades at $5.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SEATW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LCFYW trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -146.75. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LCFY trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while KRKR trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ONFO trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SLE trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while MNYWW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while CMCM trades at $5.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while CRTD trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while TC trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 724.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while ONFOW trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 262.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while FENG trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $37.67, while BLCT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.84, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.