Pinterest, Inc.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 1.94T. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GOOG trades at $160.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 1.94T. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GOOGL trades at $159.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.65T. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while META trades at $656.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas META's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 124.57B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SPOT trades at $619.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 98.26. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 83.78B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while DASH trades at $197.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 247.14. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 32.58B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while BIDU trades at $91.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 20.82B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while RDDT trades at $112.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.49B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TWLO trades at $114.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -498.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ZG trades at $69.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -144.25. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.91B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while Z trades at $70.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -146.44. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SNAP trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 11.65B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TME trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while NBIS trades at $35.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -25.19. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.06B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while MTCH trades at $28.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while DJT trades at $26.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while DJTWW trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -37.06. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while CARG trades at $33.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 167.85. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while IAC trades at $38.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while YELP trades at $40.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GENI trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -54.47. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while WB trades at $8.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while DOYU trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while NN trades at $12.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NN's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while FVRR trades at $32.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 67.47. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TBLA trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GRPN trades at $26.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while MOMO trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 900.30M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while EVER trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 828.33M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while OPRA trades at $18.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 823.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ATHM trades at $26.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 796.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ANGI trades at $16.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 746.22M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GETY trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 700.34M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while MAX trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 681.45M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SSTK trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 675.06M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SMWB trades at $8.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -58.21. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 669.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while NNAVW trades at $5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 652.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while THRY trades at $14.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 624.51M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TTGT trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 533.71M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while KIND trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 488.65M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while PERI trades at $10.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 43.40. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PERI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 366.70M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ZH trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 359.56M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while AREN trades at $7.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is -34.36. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to AREN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 334.48M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TRVG trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 292.32M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while OB trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 270.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SEAT trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -69.33. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SEAT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 177.10M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ILLR trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 176.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ILLRW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 127.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TRUE trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 109.78M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while JOYY trades at $42.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 88.01M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while JFIN trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 86.05M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ASST trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 70.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while BZFD trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 69.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while CCG trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.60M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BODY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 55.03M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GIFT trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 46.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while PODC trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 38.73M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while IZEA trades at $2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 36.08M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while BODI trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32.37M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while MNY trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 31.42M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ZDGE trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -16.82. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SEATW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SEATW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.93M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SCOR trades at $5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.43M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 14.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while UPXI trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 11.13M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while NAMI trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NAMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.44M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while KRKR trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 9.07M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LCFYW trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -86.88. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.39M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LCFY trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.58M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ONFO trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SLE trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SLE's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ROI's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while CRTD trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.41M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while CMCM trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.23M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 974205.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while ONFOW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291828.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 254241.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while FENG trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 32327.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while SOGP trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9042.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while TC trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8119.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.

PINS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PINS stands at 22.31B. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2634.00. Regarding current trading prices, PINS is priced at $32.93, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PINS currently has a P/E ratio of 12.33, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PINS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PINS is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PINS.