Pacific Booker Minerals Inc.
Pacific Booker Minerals Inc. (PBMLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBMLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBMLF | $0.76 | +0.00% | 12.8M | -25.43 | -$0.03 | N/A |
BHPLF | $25.54 | -8.42% | 129.6B | 11.40 | $2.24 | +4.86% |
RTNTF | $74.71 | -4.46% | 104B | 10.57 | $7.07 | +3.01% |
RTPPF | $58.60 | -4.72% | 100.1B | 8.29 | $7.07 | +6.86% |
GLNCY | $7.96 | -2.57% | 49.3B | -30.58 | -$0.26 | +2.65% |
GMBXF | $6.37 | -2.29% | 49B | 13.10 | $0.48 | +3.80% |
GLCNF | $4.00 | -2.20% | 48.2B | -31.23 | -$0.13 | +2.83% |
FSUMF | $12.10 | +0.83% | 37.2B | 9.60 | $1.26 | +7.61% |
FSUGY | $23.03 | -2.04% | 35.5B | 9.13 | $2.53 | +7.79% |
AAUKF | $28.89 | -3.54% | 31.2B | -10.07 | -$2.87 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
PBMLF vs BHPLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while BHPLF trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check BHPLF's competition here
PBMLF vs RTNTF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while RTNTF trades at $74.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
PBMLF vs RTPPF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while RTPPF trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check RTPPF's competition here
PBMLF vs GLNCY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while GLNCY trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check GLNCY's competition here
PBMLF vs GMBXF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while GMBXF trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check GMBXF's competition here
PBMLF vs GLCNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while GLCNF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -31.23. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check GLCNF's competition here
PBMLF vs FSUMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while FSUMF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check FSUMF's competition here
PBMLF vs FSUGY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while FSUGY trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check FSUGY's competition here
PBMLF vs AAUKF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AAUKF trades at $28.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check AAUKF's competition here
PBMLF vs NGLOY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while NGLOY trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check NGLOY's competition here
PBMLF vs CMCLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while CMCLF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check CMCLF's competition here
PBMLF vs TCKRF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while TCKRF trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 99.39. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check TCKRF's competition here
PBMLF vs IVPAF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while IVPAF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check IVPAF's competition here
PBMLF vs IPOAF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while IPOAF trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and IPOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPOAF's competition here
PBMLF vs BOLIF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
PBMLF vs BDNNY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while BDNNY trades at $63.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check BDNNY's competition here
PBMLF vs JXMNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check JXMNF's competition here
PBMLF vs SHTLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SHTLF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
PBMLF vs ABML Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ABML's competition here
PBMLF vs LYSCF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while LYSCF trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 172.75. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check LYSCF's competition here
PBMLF vs LYSDY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while LYSDY trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 172.50. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check LYSDY's competition here
PBMLF vs STMNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
PBMLF vs SMMYY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SMMYY trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.20. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check SMMYY's competition here
PBMLF vs PUTKY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PUTKY trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check PUTKY's competition here
PBMLF vs PUTKF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
PBMLF vs NILSY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
PBMLF vs PAEKY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
PBMLF vs MALRY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MALRY trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MALRY's competition here
PBMLF vs PILBF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PILBF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check PILBF's competition here
PBMLF vs MALRF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MALRF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
PBMLF vs FLMMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check FLMMF's competition here
PBMLF vs NGXXF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while NGXXF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -50.14. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check NGXXF's competition here
PBMLF vs IIDDY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
PBMLF vs CHZQ Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
PBMLF vs IPGDF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while IPGDF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check IPGDF's competition here
PBMLF vs PTNDY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
PBMLF vs MIMTF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MIMTF trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MIMTF's competition here
PBMLF vs DWMNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
PBMLF vs NICMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
PBMLF vs AZZVF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
PBMLF vs AFBOF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFBOF's competition here
PBMLF vs ERMAF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 109.60. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAF's competition here
PBMLF vs ERMAY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ERMAY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 105.33. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
PBMLF vs SOUHY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SOUHY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.77. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check SOUHY's competition here
PBMLF vs PTNDF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check PTNDF's competition here
PBMLF vs ILKAF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ILKAF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and ILKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAF's competition here
PBMLF vs TAOFF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check TAOFF's competition here
PBMLF vs ILKAY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ILKAY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ILKAY's competition here
PBMLF vs DETRF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while DETRF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check DETRF's competition here
PBMLF vs ADTLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ADTLF's competition here
PBMLF vs ADMLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ADMLF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ADMLF's competition here
PBMLF vs LINRF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while LINRF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -48.40. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check LINRF's competition here
PBMLF vs AZRMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
PBMLF vs MFRVF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MFRVF's competition here
PBMLF vs FMCXF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 986.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while FMCXF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -45.75. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check FMCXF's competition here
PBMLF vs ATUSF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 974.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ATUSF trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ATUSF's competition here
PBMLF vs AMVMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 941.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AMVMF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -76.79. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check AMVMF's competition here
PBMLF vs STTSY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check STTSY's competition here
PBMLF vs AFMJF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 876.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AFMJF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check AFMJF's competition here
PBMLF vs ALMTF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ALMTF's competition here
PBMLF vs AUSDF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
PBMLF vs CTJHF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check CTJHF's competition here
PBMLF vs CREQF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while CREQF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check CREQF's competition here
PBMLF vs NCKAF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check NCKAF's competition here
PBMLF vs MJDLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 519.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MJDLF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MJDLF's competition here
PBMLF vs VULNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while VULNF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
PBMLF vs BQSSF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 500M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while BQSSF trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check BQSSF's competition here
PBMLF vs FGOVF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -94.05. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check FGOVF's competition here
PBMLF vs TTNNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check TTNNF's competition here
PBMLF vs PTTMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check PTTMF's competition here
PBMLF vs OSTTF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check OSTTF's competition here
PBMLF vs REEMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 474.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while REEMF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check REEMF's competition here
PBMLF vs MCRZF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MCRZF's competition here
PBMLF vs PMETF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 453.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PMETF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -93.07. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check PMETF's competition here
PBMLF vs MNXMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 452.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MNXMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -69.25. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MNXMF's competition here
PBMLF vs BIRNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check BIRNF's competition here
PBMLF vs SLGGF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 424.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SLGGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check SLGGF's competition here
PBMLF vs CGMLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while CGMLF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check CGMLF's competition here
PBMLF vs KMRPF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while KMRPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check KMRPF's competition here
PBMLF vs VTMXF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, VTMXF has a market cap of 383.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while VTMXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas VTMXF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to VTMXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and VTMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMXF's competition here
PBMLF vs NQMIY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
PBMLF vs MLYF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MLYF's competition here
PBMLF vs PXMFF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMFF's competition here
PBMLF vs MLXEF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MLXEF's competition here
PBMLF vs CTJHY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 343M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while CTJHY trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHY's competition here
PBMLF vs FWEDF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 342.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while FWEDF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.93. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check FWEDF's competition here
PBMLF vs MCHHF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
PBMLF vs ERLFF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.56. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ERLFF's competition here
PBMLF vs RTLGF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 333.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while RTLGF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check RTLGF's competition here
PBMLF vs ARAFF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 320.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check ARAFF's competition here
PBMLF vs SVMLF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check SVMLF's competition here
PBMLF vs BSSMF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
PBMLF vs SRHYY Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SRHYY trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check SRHYY's competition here
PBMLF vs PRMNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 283M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while PRMNF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check PRMNF's competition here
PBMLF vs LTSRF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check LTSRF's competition here
PBMLF vs SYAAF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 260.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while SYAAF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and SYAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYAAF's competition here
PBMLF vs LRSRF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check LRSRF's competition here
PBMLF vs STQNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STQNF's competition here
PBMLF vs MGMNF Comparison July 2025
PBMLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBMLF stands at 12.8M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBMLF is priced at $0.76, while MGMNF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBMLF currently has a P/E ratio of -25.43, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, PBMLF's ROE is -3.46%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PBMLF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBMLF.Check MGMNF's competition here