PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | $39.15 | -1.29% | 4.6B | 10.34 | $3.79 | +2.79% |
| MPC | $250.47 | -0.16% | 73.1B | 16.50 | $15.18 | +1.56% |
| VLO | $244.13 | -1.23% | 72.5B | 17.84 | $13.69 | +1.91% |
| PSX | $172.00 | -0.73% | 69B | 17.00 | $10.12 | +2.88% |
| DINO | $66.58 | -1.00% | 12B | 10.00 | $6.66 | +3.00% |
| APC | $19.54 | +0.57% | 11.7B | 25.71 | $0.76 | +1.49% |
| SUN | $63.54 | -2.11% | 8.7B | 16.24 | $3.92 | +5.90% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | +0.96% |
| UGP | $4.69 | -1.68% | 5B | 8.51 | $0.55 | +5.08% |
| VVV | $37.75 | -1.02% | 4.8B | 50.33 | $0.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PBF vs MPC Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while MPC trades at $250.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check MPC's competition here
PBF vs VLO Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while VLO trades at $244.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VLO's competition here
PBF vs PSX Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while PSX trades at $172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PSX's competition here
PBF vs DINO Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while DINO trades at $66.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DINO's competition here
PBF vs APC Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while APC trades at $19.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check APC's competition here
PBF vs SUN Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while SUN trades at $63.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SUN's competition here
PBF vs HFC Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check HFC's competition here
PBF vs UGP Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while UGP trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check UGP's competition here
PBF vs VVV Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while VVV trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 50.33. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VVV's competition here
PBF vs REGI Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check REGI's competition here
PBF vs CVI Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while CVI trades at $28.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is -67.88. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVI's competition here
PBF vs DK Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while DK trades at $44.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -48.89. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DK's competition here
PBF vs PARR Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while PARR trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PARR's competition here
PBF vs CSAN Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CSAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while CSAN trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas CSAN's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSAN's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CSAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CSAN's competition here
PBF vs WKC Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while WKC trades at $31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WKC's competition here
PBF vs INT Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check INT's competition here
PBF vs CAPL Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 828.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while CAPL trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CAPL's competition here
PBF vs CLNE Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 416.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while CLNE trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CLNE's competition here
PBF vs SGU Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 409.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while SGU trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SGU's competition here
PBF vs AMTX Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while AMTX trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AMTX's competition here
PBF vs AE Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AE's competition here
PBF vs TMDE Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while TMDE trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check TMDE's competition here
PBF vs BPT Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check BPT's competition here
PBF vs VTNR Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VTNR's competition here
PBF vs WNR Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while WNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas WNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to WNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WNR's competition here
PBF vs SRLP Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SRLP's competition here
PBF vs PTXP Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while PTXP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas PTXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PTXP's competition here
PBF vs GI Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while GI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas GI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to GI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check GI's competition here
PBF vs NTI Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check NTI's competition here
PBF vs SHI Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SHI's competition here
PBF vs CVRR Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CVRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while CVRR trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas CVRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVRR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVRR's competition here
PBF vs WNRL Comparison June 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WNRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $39.15, while WNRL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.34, whereas WNRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WNRL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to WNRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WNRL's competition here