PBF Energy Inc.
PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | $41.27 | +1.30% | 4.8B | -29.33 | -$1.39 | +2.68% |
| VLO | $239.28 | +1.45% | 71.2B | 31.43 | $7.58 | +1.92% |
| MPC | $227.59 | +1.54% | 66.9B | 16.96 | $13.40 | +1.67% |
| PSX | $166.30 | +2.12% | 65.8B | 15.20 | $10.80 | +2.96% |
| DINO | $62.24 | +3.29% | 11.1B | 20.07 | $3.08 | +3.24% |
| APC | $18.13 | +0.78% | 10.9B | 25.62 | $0.71 | +1.60% |
| SUN | $66.47 | +0.85% | 9B | 28.95 | $2.28 | +5.54% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | N/A |
| UGP | $5.85 | +1.65% | 6.3B | 12.37 | $0.47 | +4.08% |
| VVV | $33.10 | -0.39% | 4.2B | 47.82 | $0.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PBF vs VLO Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while VLO trades at $239.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VLO's competition here
PBF vs MPC Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while MPC trades at $227.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check MPC's competition here
PBF vs PSX Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 65.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while PSX trades at $166.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PSX's competition here
PBF vs DINO Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while DINO trades at $62.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DINO's competition here
PBF vs APC Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while APC trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check APC's competition here
PBF vs SUN Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while SUN trades at $66.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SUN's competition here
PBF vs HFC Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check HFC's competition here
PBF vs UGP Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while UGP trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check UGP's competition here
PBF vs VVV Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while VVV trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 47.82. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VVV's competition here
PBF vs CSAN Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CSAN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while CSAN trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas CSAN's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSAN's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CSAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CSAN's competition here
PBF vs CVI Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while CVI trades at $32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CVI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVI's competition here
PBF vs PARR Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while PARR trades at $64.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PARR's competition here
PBF vs REGI Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check REGI's competition here
PBF vs DK Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while DK trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -118.94. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DK's competition here
PBF vs INT Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check INT's competition here
PBF vs WKC Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while WKC trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WKC's competition here
PBF vs CAPL Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 803.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while CAPL trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CAPL's competition here
PBF vs CLNE Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 484.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while CLNE trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CLNE's competition here
PBF vs SGU Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 414.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while SGU trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SGU's competition here
PBF vs AMTX Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while AMTX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AMTX's competition here
PBF vs AE Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AE's competition here
PBF vs TMDE Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while TMDE trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check TMDE's competition here
PBF vs BPT Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check BPT's competition here
PBF vs VTNR Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VTNR's competition here
PBF vs CVRR Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CVRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while CVRR trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas CVRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CVRR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVRR's competition here
PBF vs SRLP Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SRLP's competition here
PBF vs NTI Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check NTI's competition here
PBF vs WNRL Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WNRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while WNRL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas WNRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WNRL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to WNRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WNRL's competition here
PBF vs GI Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while GI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas GI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to GI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check GI's competition here
PBF vs SHI Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SHI's competition here
PBF vs WNR Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while WNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas WNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to WNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WNR's competition here
PBF vs PTXP Comparison April 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PTXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $41.27, while PTXP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.33, whereas PTXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PTXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PTXP's competition here