PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | $47.81 | -0.48% | 5.7B | -24.64 | -$1.94 | +2.30% |
| VLO | $267.76 | -0.62% | 79.5B | 19.15 | $13.98 | +1.74% |
| MPC | $266.35 | +0.56% | 77.8B | 20.99 | $12.69 | +1.47% |
| PSX | $176.42 | +1.10% | 70.7B | 22.45 | $7.86 | +2.80% |
| DINO | $72.50 | -0.08% | 13.1B | 12.02 | $6.03 | +2.76% |
| APC | $18.59 | +2.09% | 11.2B | 26.94 | $0.69 | +1.56% |
| SUN | $68.28 | +0.72% | 9.3B | 17.46 | $3.91 | +5.49% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | +0.96% |
| UGP | $5.07 | +2.01% | 5.4B | 10.14 | $0.50 | +4.69% |
| VVV | $39.08 | +2.44% | 5B | 22.99 | $1.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PBF vs VLO Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while VLO trades at $267.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VLO's competition here
PBF vs MPC Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while MPC trades at $266.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check MPC's competition here
PBF vs PSX Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while PSX trades at $176.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PSX's competition here
PBF vs DINO Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while DINO trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DINO's competition here
PBF vs APC Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while APC trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check APC's competition here
PBF vs SUN Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while SUN trades at $68.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SUN's competition here
PBF vs HFC Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check HFC's competition here
PBF vs UGP Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while UGP trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check UGP's competition here
PBF vs VVV Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while VVV trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VVV's competition here
PBF vs DK Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while DK trades at $52.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas DK's P/E ratio is 35.55. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DK's competition here
PBF vs CLMT Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while CLMT trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CLMT's competition here
PBF vs REGI Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check REGI's competition here
PBF vs PARR Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while PARR trades at $58.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PARR's competition here
PBF vs CVI Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while CVI trades at $28.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVI's competition here
PBF vs CSAN Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CSAN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while CSAN trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CSAN's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSAN's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CSAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CSAN's competition here
PBF vs WKC Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while WKC trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WKC's competition here
PBF vs INT Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check INT's competition here
PBF vs CAPL Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 859.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while CAPL trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 44.16. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CAPL's competition here
PBF vs CLNE Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while CLNE trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CLNE's competition here
PBF vs SGU Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 422.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while SGU trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SGU's competition here
PBF vs AMTX Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while AMTX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AMTX's competition here
PBF vs AE Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AE's competition here
PBF vs TMDE Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while TMDE trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check TMDE's competition here
PBF vs BPT Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check BPT's competition here
PBF vs VTNR Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VTNR's competition here
PBF vs SRLP Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SRLP's competition here
PBF vs WNRL Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WNRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while WNRL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas WNRL's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WNRL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to WNRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WNRL's competition here
PBF vs WNR Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while WNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas WNR's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to WNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WNR's competition here
PBF vs NTI Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check NTI's competition here
PBF vs SHI Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SHI's competition here
PBF vs PTXP Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PTXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while PTXP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas PTXP's P/E ratio is 377.93. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PTXP's competition here
PBF vs GI Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while GI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas GI's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to GI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check GI's competition here
PBF vs CVRR Comparison July 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CVRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $47.81, while CVRR trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -24.64, whereas CVRR's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVRR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVRR's competition here