Cosan S.A. (CSAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSAN | $2.72 | +5.02% | 2.7B | -1.03 | -$2.64 | N/A |
| MPC | $244.61 | -2.34% | 71.4B | 16.10 | $15.20 | +1.59% |
| VLO | $239.77 | -1.79% | 71.2B | 17.52 | $13.69 | +1.93% |
| PSX | $167.17 | -2.81% | 67B | 16.52 | $10.12 | +2.93% |
| DINO | $65.91 | -1.01% | 11.9B | 9.90 | $6.66 | +3.02% |
| APC | $18.56 | -5.02% | 11.1B | 24.42 | $0.76 | +1.56% |
| SUN | $62.82 | -1.13% | 8.6B | 15.98 | $3.92 | +6.03% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | +0.96% |
| UGP | $4.70 | +0.21% | 5B | 8.41 | $0.56 | +5.02% |
| VVV | $37.44 | -0.82% | 4.8B | 49.95 | $0.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSAN vs MPC Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while MPC trades at $244.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check MPC's competition here
CSAN vs VLO Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while VLO trades at $239.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VLO's competition here
CSAN vs PSX Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while PSX trades at $167.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PSX's competition here
CSAN vs DINO Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while DINO trades at $65.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check DINO's competition here
CSAN vs APC Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while APC trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to APC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check APC's competition here
CSAN vs SUN Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while SUN trades at $62.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SUN's competition here
CSAN vs HFC Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check HFC's competition here
CSAN vs UGP Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while UGP trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check UGP's competition here
CSAN vs VVV Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while VVV trades at $37.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 49.95. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VVV's competition here
CSAN vs PBF Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while PBF trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PBF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PBF's competition here
CSAN vs REGI Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check REGI's competition here
CSAN vs CVI Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while CVI trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is -65.95. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CVI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CVI's competition here
CSAN vs DK Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while DK trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -47.02. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check DK's competition here
CSAN vs PARR Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while PARR trades at $50.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PARR's competition here
CSAN vs WKC Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while WKC trades at $31.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WKC's competition here
CSAN vs INT Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check INT's competition here
CSAN vs CAPL Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 820.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while CAPL trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CAPL's competition here
CSAN vs CLNE Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while CLNE trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CLNE's competition here
CSAN vs SGU Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 405.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while SGU trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SGU's competition here
CSAN vs AMTX Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while AMTX trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check AMTX's competition here
CSAN vs AE Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check AE's competition here
CSAN vs TMDE Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while TMDE trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check TMDE's competition here
CSAN vs BPT Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check BPT's competition here
CSAN vs VTNR Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VTNR's competition here
CSAN vs WNR Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while WNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to WNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WNR's competition here
CSAN vs SRLP Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SRLP's competition here
CSAN vs PTXP Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PTXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while PTXP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas PTXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PTXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PTXP's competition here
CSAN vs GI Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while GI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas GI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to GI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to GI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check GI's competition here
CSAN vs NTI Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check NTI's competition here
CSAN vs SHI Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SHI's competition here
CSAN vs CVRR Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CVRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while CVRR trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas CVRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CVRR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CVRR's competition here
CSAN vs WNRL Comparison June 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WNRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $2.72, while WNRL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.03, whereas WNRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WNRL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to WNRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WNRL's competition here