Cosan S.A. (CSAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSAN | $3.02 | +2.72% | 3B | -2.32 | -$1.30 | N/A |
| VLO | $281.25 | -0.58% | 83.5B | 20.11 | $13.98 | +1.66% |
| MPC | $283.30 | +0.93% | 82.7B | 22.32 | $12.69 | +1.39% |
| PSX | $189.82 | +6.14% | 75.3B | 23.89 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| DINO | $77.52 | -1.40% | 14B | 12.85 | $6.03 | +2.58% |
| APC | $19.25 | +0.16% | 11.5B | 27.90 | $0.69 | +1.51% |
| SUN | $68.58 | -1.44% | 9.4B | 17.55 | $3.91 | +5.45% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | +0.96% |
| PBF | $53.31 | +0.78% | 6.3B | -27.47 | -$1.94 | +2.09% |
| UGP | $5.81 | +2.47% | 6.2B | 11.65 | $0.50 | +4.09% |
Stock Comparison
CSAN vs VLO Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while VLO trades at $281.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VLO's competition here
CSAN vs MPC Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while MPC trades at $283.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check MPC's competition here
CSAN vs PSX Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while PSX trades at $189.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PSX's competition here
CSAN vs DINO Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while DINO trades at $77.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check DINO's competition here
CSAN vs APC Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while APC trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to APC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check APC's competition here
CSAN vs SUN Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while SUN trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SUN's competition here
CSAN vs HFC Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check HFC's competition here
CSAN vs PBF Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, PBF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while PBF trades at $53.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PBF's P/E ratio is -27.47. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PBF's competition here
CSAN vs UGP Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while UGP trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check UGP's competition here
CSAN vs VVV Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while VVV trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VVV's competition here
CSAN vs DK Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while DK trades at $56.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas DK's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check DK's competition here
CSAN vs CLMT Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while CLMT trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CLMT's competition here
CSAN vs PARR Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while PARR trades at $65.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PARR's competition here
CSAN vs CVI Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while CVI trades at $31.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is -16.73. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CVI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CVI's competition here
CSAN vs REGI Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check REGI's competition here
CSAN vs WKC Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while WKC trades at $34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WKC's competition here
CSAN vs INT Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check INT's competition here
CSAN vs CAPL Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 862.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while CAPL trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 44.31. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CAPL's competition here
CSAN vs CLNE Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 473.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while CLNE trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CLNE's competition here
CSAN vs SGU Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 424.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while SGU trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SGU's competition here
CSAN vs AMTX Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while AMTX trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check AMTX's competition here
CSAN vs AE Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check AE's competition here
CSAN vs TMDE Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while TMDE trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check TMDE's competition here
CSAN vs BPT Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check BPT's competition here
CSAN vs VTNR Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check VTNR's competition here
CSAN vs GI Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, GI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while GI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas GI's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to GI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to GI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check GI's competition here
CSAN vs WNRL Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, WNRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while WNRL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas WNRL's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WNRL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is less volatile compared to WNRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WNRL's competition here
CSAN vs NTI Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check NTI's competition here
CSAN vs CVRR Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, CVRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while CVRR trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas CVRR's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to CVRR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to CVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check CVRR's competition here
CSAN vs WNR Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, WNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while WNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas WNR's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to WNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to WNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check WNR's competition here
CSAN vs SRLP Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SRLP's competition here
CSAN vs SHI Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check SHI's competition here
CSAN vs PTXP Comparison July 2026
CSAN plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSAN stands at 3B. In comparison, PTXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSAN is priced at $3.02, while PTXP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSAN currently has a P/E ratio of -2.32, whereas PTXP's P/E ratio is 377.93. In terms of profitability, CSAN's ROE is -1.74%, compared to PTXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSAN is more volatile compared to PTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSAN.Check PTXP's competition here