HF Sinclair Corporation
HF Sinclair Corporation (HFC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | N/A |
| VLO | $239.26 | +2.32% | 70.5B | 31.20 | $7.56 | +1.96% |
| MPC | $228.92 | +3.53% | 66.1B | 16.94 | $13.23 | +1.71% |
| PSX | $164.62 | +3.19% | 65.3B | 15.09 | $10.79 | +3.02% |
| DINO | $61.59 | +3.44% | 10.9B | 19.56 | $3.08 | +3.31% |
| APC | $18.22 | +2.12% | 10.8B | 25.34 | $0.71 | +1.61% |
| SUN | $65.87 | -0.48% | 9B | 28.85 | $2.28 | +5.59% |
| UGP | $5.84 | +1.83% | 6.3B | 12.23 | $0.47 | +4.14% |
| PBF | $41.42 | +1.10% | 4.8B | -29.29 | -$1.39 | +2.71% |
| VVV | $33.23 | +2.78% | 4.2B | 48.20 | $0.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HFC vs VLO Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while VLO trades at $239.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check VLO's competition here
HFC vs MPC Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while MPC trades at $228.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check MPC's competition here
HFC vs PSX Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PSX trades at $164.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check PSX's competition here
HFC vs DINO Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while DINO trades at $61.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check DINO's competition here
HFC vs APC Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while APC trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check APC's competition here
HFC vs SUN Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SUN trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check SUN's competition here
HFC vs UGP Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while UGP trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check UGP's competition here
HFC vs PBF Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PBF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PBF trades at $41.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PBF's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check PBF's competition here
HFC vs VVV Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while VVV trades at $33.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 48.20. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check VVV's competition here
HFC vs CSAN Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CSAN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CSAN trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSAN's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSAN's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CSAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check CSAN's competition here
HFC vs PARR Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PARR trades at $65.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check PARR's competition here
HFC vs CVI Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CVI trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is 116.67. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check CVI's competition here
HFC vs REGI Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check REGI's competition here
HFC vs DK Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while DK trades at $40.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -116.68. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check DK's competition here
HFC vs INT Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check INT's competition here
HFC vs WKC Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while WKC trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check WKC's competition here
HFC vs CAPL Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 795.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CAPL trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check CAPL's competition here
HFC vs CLNE Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 500.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CLNE trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check CLNE's competition here
HFC vs SGU Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SGU trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check SGU's competition here
HFC vs AMTX Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while AMTX trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check AMTX's competition here
HFC vs AE Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check AE's competition here
HFC vs TMDE Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while TMDE trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check TMDE's competition here
HFC vs BPT Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check BPT's competition here
HFC vs VTNR Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check VTNR's competition here
HFC vs WNR Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while WNR trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to WNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check WNR's competition here
HFC vs PTXP Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PTXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while PTXP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PTXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTXP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to PTXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check PTXP's competition here
HFC vs SHI Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check SHI's competition here
HFC vs GI Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while GI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas GI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GI's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to GI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check GI's competition here
HFC vs WNRL Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WNRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while WNRL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WNRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNRL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to WNRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check WNRL's competition here
HFC vs NTI Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check NTI's competition here
HFC vs SRLP Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check SRLP's competition here
HFC vs CVRR Comparison April 2026
HFC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HFC stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CVRR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HFC is priced at $36.39, while CVRR trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HFC currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CVRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HFC's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVRR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HFC is more volatile compared to CVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HFC.Check CVRR's competition here