PBF Energy Inc.
PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | $43.55 | +1.47% | 5.1B | -29.59 | -$1.47 | +2.54% |
| VLO | $232.86 | -1.25% | 70.4B | 30.43 | $7.58 | +1.98% |
| PSX | $173.08 | -0.58% | 69.2B | 16.00 | $10.80 | +2.79% |
| MPC | $228.18 | -0.83% | 68B | 17.11 | $13.22 | +1.67% |
| APC | $18.76 | +0.54% | 10.8B | 25.73 | $0.70 | +0.17% |
| DINO | $56.28 | -1.76% | 10.3B | 18.09 | $3.08 | +3.57% |
| SUN | $65.12 | +3.61% | 8.8B | 28.21 | $2.28 | +5.72% |
| HFC | $36.39 | +1.99% | 7.1B | 10.74 | $3.39 | N/A |
| UGP | $4.98 | +0.51% | 5.3B | 10.89 | $0.45 | +4.49% |
| VVV | $33.86 | -0.54% | 4.3B | 48.71 | $0.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PBF vs VLO Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VLO has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while VLO trades at $232.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas VLO's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VLO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to VLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VLO's competition here
PBF vs PSX Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PSX has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while PSX trades at $173.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas PSX's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PSX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PSX's competition here
PBF vs MPC Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MPC has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while MPC trades at $228.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas MPC's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MPC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to MPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check MPC's competition here
PBF vs APC Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, APC has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while APC trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas APC's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to APC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to APC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check APC's competition here
PBF vs DINO Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DINO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while DINO trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas DINO's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DINO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to DINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DINO's competition here
PBF vs SUN Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SUN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while SUN trades at $65.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas SUN's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SUN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SUN's competition here
PBF vs HFC Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HFC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while HFC trades at $36.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas HFC's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to HFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check HFC's competition here
PBF vs UGP Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UGP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while UGP trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas UGP's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UGP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to UGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check UGP's competition here
PBF vs VVV Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VVV has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while VVV trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas VVV's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VVV's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to VVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VVV's competition here
PBF vs CSAN Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CSAN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while CSAN trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas CSAN's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSAN's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CSAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CSAN's competition here
PBF vs REGI Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, REGI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while REGI trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas REGI's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to REGI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to REGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check REGI's competition here
PBF vs CVI Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CVI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while CVI trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas CVI's P/E ratio is 105.80. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CVI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CVI's competition here
PBF vs PARR Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PARR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while PARR trades at $53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas PARR's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PARR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to PARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check PARR's competition here
PBF vs DK Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while DK trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas DK's P/E ratio is -122.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to DK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check DK's competition here
PBF vs INT Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, INT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while INT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas INT's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to INT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check INT's competition here
PBF vs WKC Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WKC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while WKC trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas WKC's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WKC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to WKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check WKC's competition here
PBF vs CAPL Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CAPL has a market cap of 827.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while CAPL trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas CAPL's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CAPL's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CAPL's competition here
PBF vs CLNE Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CLNE has a market cap of 478.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while CLNE trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas CLNE's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to CLNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check CLNE's competition here
PBF vs SGU Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SGU has a market cap of 407.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while SGU trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas SGU's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SGU's competition here
PBF vs AMTX Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AMTX has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while AMTX trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas AMTX's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to AMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AMTX's competition here
PBF vs AE Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AE has a market cap of 97.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while AE trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas AE's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to AE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check AE's competition here
PBF vs TMDE Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TMDE has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while TMDE trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas TMDE's P/E ratio is -14.34. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMDE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to TMDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check TMDE's competition here
PBF vs BPT Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BPT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while BPT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas BPT's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BPT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to BPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check BPT's competition here
PBF vs VTNR Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VTNR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while VTNR trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas VTNR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VTNR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is less volatile compared to VTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check VTNR's competition here
PBF vs SRLP Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SRLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while SRLP trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas SRLP's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SRLP's ROE of +20.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SRLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SRLP's competition here
PBF vs NTI Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NTI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while NTI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas NTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NTI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to NTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check NTI's competition here
PBF vs SHI Comparison March 2026
PBF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PBF stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SHI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PBF is priced at $43.55, while SHI trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PBF currently has a P/E ratio of -29.59, whereas SHI's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, PBF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SHI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PBF is more volatile compared to SHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PBF.Check SHI's competition here