One Stop Systems, Inc.
One Stop Systems, Inc. OSS Peers
See (OSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSS | $5.17 | +29.57% | 95.2M | -6.49 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| ANET | $108.69 | +2.26% | 133.5B | 44.86 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $126.78 | +0.12% | 86.9B | 20.02 | $6.39 | +1.81% |
| STX | $145.96 | +2.78% | 30.7B | 20.82 | $6.94 | +1.97% |
| SMCI | $49.96 | -0.12% | 30.1B | 27.37 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $25.50 | -0.49% | 24.1B | 9.89 | $2.60 | +5.49% |
| WDC | $66.02 | +2.13% | 22.7B | 22.28 | $2.92 | +0.15% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $104.95 | -1.62% | 21.3B | 18.77 | $5.67 | +2.44% |
| PSTG | $56.63 | -2.72% | 18.8B | 151.47 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
OSS vs ANET Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 133.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while ANET trades at $108.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs DELL Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while DELL trades at $126.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs STX Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while STX trades at $145.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs SMCI Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while SMCI trades at $49.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs HPQ Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while HPQ trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs WDC Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while WDC trades at $66.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs CAJ Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs NTAP Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while NTAP trades at $104.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs PSTG Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while PSTG trades at $56.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 151.47. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs LOGI Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while LOGI trades at $94.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs IONQ Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while IONQ trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -30.42. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs IONQ-WT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while IONQ-WT trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs SNDKV Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs QBTS Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while QBTS trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -24.27. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs QBTS-WT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while QBTS-WT trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs RGTI Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while RGTI trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs RGTIW Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while RGTIW trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs QUBT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while QUBT trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -35.53. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs CRCT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while CRCT trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs CRSR Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while CRSR trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs MKFG-WT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs SSYS Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 961.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while SSYS trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs RCAT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 666.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while RCAT trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs NNDM Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 344.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while NNDM trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs DDD Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while DDD trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs CAN Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 207.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while CAN trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs DM Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs TIO Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs MICT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs MKFG Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs ALOT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while ALOT trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs INVE Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while INVE trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs YIBO Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while YIBO trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs ZSPC Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while ZSPC trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs STRC Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs QMCO Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while QMCO trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs TACT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while TACT trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs FATH Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs KTCC Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while KTCC trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs EBON Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while EBON trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs UAVS Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while UAVS trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs SGE Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs VLD Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs SCKT Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while SCKT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs VJET Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.
OSS vs STRCW Comparison
OSS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OSS stands at 95.2M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OSS is priced at $5.17, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OSS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.49, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, OSS's ROE is -0.48%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OSS is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OSS.