OnMobile Global Limited
OnMobile Global Limited (ONMOBILE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ONMOBILE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONMOBILE.NS | ₹51.94 | +0.93% | 5.5B | 31.53 | ₹1.63 | N/A |
| BHARTIARTL.NS | ₹1,988.60 | +0.57% | 11.4T | 39.54 | ₹50.51 | +0.80% |
| BHARTIARTL.BO | ₹1,990.30 | +0.64% | 11.4T | 39.51 | ₹50.55 | +0.80% |
| INDUSTOWER.NS | ₹472.90 | -0.31% | 1.2T | 17.43 | ₹27.09 | N/A |
| INDUSTOWER.BO | ₹472.50 | -0.30% | 1.2T | 17.44 | ₹27.06 | N/A |
| IDEA.BO | ₹11.27 | +0.90% | 1.2T | -4.18 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| IDEA.NS | ₹11.26 | +0.90% | 1.2T | -4.17 | -₹2.63 | N/A |
| BHARTIHEXA.NS | ₹1,680.40 | -0.46% | 848.9B | 48.34 | ₹35.12 | +0.59% |
| TATACOMM.NS | ₹1,656.50 | -1.79% | 479.3B | 31.14 | ₹54.00 | +1.49% |
| TATACOMM.BO | ₹1,654.25 | -2.12% | 478.8B | 31.11 | ₹54.00 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
ONMOBILE.NS vs BHARTIARTL.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.NS has a market cap of 11.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while BHARTIARTL.NS trades at ₹1,988.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas BHARTIARTL.NS's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHARTIARTL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs BHARTIARTL.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BHARTIARTL.BO has a market cap of 11.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while BHARTIARTL.BO trades at ₹1,990.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas BHARTIARTL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHARTIARTL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to BHARTIARTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check BHARTIARTL.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs INDUSTOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while INDUSTOWER.NS trades at ₹472.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas INDUSTOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDUSTOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs INDUSTOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDUSTOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while INDUSTOWER.BO trades at ₹472.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas INDUSTOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDUSTOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSTOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check INDUSTOWER.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs IDEA.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, IDEA.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while IDEA.BO trades at ₹11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas IDEA.BO's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDEA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check IDEA.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs IDEA.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, IDEA.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while IDEA.NS trades at ₹11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas IDEA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDEA.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to IDEA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check IDEA.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs BHARTIHEXA.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BHARTIHEXA.NS has a market cap of 848.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while BHARTIHEXA.NS trades at ₹1,680.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas BHARTIHEXA.NS's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to BHARTIHEXA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check BHARTIHEXA.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs TATACOMM.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TATACOMM.NS has a market cap of 479.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while TATACOMM.NS trades at ₹1,656.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas TATACOMM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATACOMM.NS's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check TATACOMM.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs TATACOMM.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TATACOMM.BO has a market cap of 478.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while TATACOMM.BO trades at ₹1,654.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas TATACOMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATACOMM.BO's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to TATACOMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check TATACOMM.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs RAILTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RAILTEL.NS has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while RAILTEL.NS trades at ₹328.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas RAILTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAILTEL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check RAILTEL.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs RAILTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RAILTEL.BO has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while RAILTEL.BO trades at ₹329.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas RAILTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAILTEL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to RAILTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check RAILTEL.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs TTML.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TTML.NS has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while TTML.NS trades at ₹42.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas TTML.NS's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to TTML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check TTML.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs TTML.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TTML.BO has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while TTML.BO trades at ₹42.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas TTML.BO's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TTML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to TTML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check TTML.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs ROUTE.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ROUTE.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while ROUTE.BO trades at ₹522.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas ROUTE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROUTE.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to ROUTE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check ROUTE.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs ROUTE.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ROUTE.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while ROUTE.NS trades at ₹522.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas ROUTE.NS's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ROUTE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to ROUTE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check ROUTE.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs SUBEX.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SUBEX.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while SUBEX.BO trades at ₹41.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas SUBEX.BO's P/E ratio is -8.73. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUBEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to SUBEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check SUBEX.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs MTNL.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MTNL.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while MTNL.NS trades at ₹30.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas MTNL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTNL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to MTNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check MTNL.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs MTNL.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MTNL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while MTNL.BO trades at ₹30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas MTNL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTNL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to MTNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check MTNL.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs SUYOG.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SUYOG.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while SUYOG.NS trades at ₹663.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas SUYOG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUYOG.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to SUYOG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check SUYOG.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs ONMOBILE.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ONMOBILE.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while ONMOBILE.BO trades at ₹51.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas ONMOBILE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONMOBILE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to ONMOBILE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check ONMOBILE.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs RCOM.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RCOM.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while RCOM.NS trades at ₹1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas RCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RCOM.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to RCOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check RCOM.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs GTL.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GTL.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while GTL.NS trades at ₹7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas GTL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check GTL.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs GTL.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GTL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while GTL.BO trades at ₹7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas GTL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to GTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check GTL.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs STML.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, STML.BO has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while STML.BO trades at ₹74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas STML.BO's P/E ratio is -89.16. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STML.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to STML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check STML.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs NETTLINX.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NETTLINX.BO has a market cap of 435.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while NETTLINX.BO trades at ₹19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas NETTLINX.BO's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NETTLINX.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to NETTLINX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check NETTLINX.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs QUADRANT.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, QUADRANT.BO has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while QUADRANT.BO trades at ₹0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas QUADRANT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QUADRANT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to QUADRANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check QUADRANT.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs UNIINFO.NS Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UNIINFO.NS has a market cap of 149.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while UNIINFO.NS trades at ₹14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas UNIINFO.NS's P/E ratio is 93.27. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNIINFO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to UNIINFO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check UNIINFO.NS's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs HATHWAYB.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HATHWAYB.BO has a market cap of 105.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while HATHWAYB.BO trades at ₹12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas HATHWAYB.BO's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HATHWAYB.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is less volatile compared to HATHWAYB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check HATHWAYB.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs CISTRO.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CISTRO.BO has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while CISTRO.BO trades at ₹1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas CISTRO.BO's P/E ratio is -35.67. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CISTRO.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to CISTRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check CISTRO.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs CITYONLINE.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CITYONLINE.BO has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while CITYONLINE.BO trades at ₹7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas CITYONLINE.BO's P/E ratio is -16.24. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CITYONLINE.BO's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to CITYONLINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check CITYONLINE.BO's competition here
ONMOBILE.NS vs KDL.BO Comparison February 2026
ONMOBILE.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ONMOBILE.NS stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KDL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONMOBILE.NS is priced at ₹51.94, while KDL.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ONMOBILE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.53, whereas KDL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONMOBILE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ONMOBILE.NS is more volatile compared to KDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONMOBILE.NS.Check KDL.BO's competition here