Olectra Greentech Limited

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹129.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹129.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹35,015.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹35,021.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 851.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,756.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 78.75. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 851B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,758.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 75.55. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 689.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,190.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 60.62. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 689.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,190.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 60.61. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 620.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MRF.NS trades at ₹145,605.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 619.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MRF.BO trades at ₹145,727.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 608.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹3,844.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 56.90. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 607.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹3,838.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 56.86. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, TIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 500.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while TIINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,488.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas TIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 83.71. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to TIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check TIINDIA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 482.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,525.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 482.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,534.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 346.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,448.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 346.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,437.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.64. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 330.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹528.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 54.08. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 327.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹528.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 53.61. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 289.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹462.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 289.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹15,257.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.99. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 289.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹462.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 288.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹15,267.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 287.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹14,483.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 287.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹14,467.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 286B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹333.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 285.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹333.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 284.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹42.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 284.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹42.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹933.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 78.12. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 241.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹932.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 78.12. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹912.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 192.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹914.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,050.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 57.13. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 191.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,046.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 57.15. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 178.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹458.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 178.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹459.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹183.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 162.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹183.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹557.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹557.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,804.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,806.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 153.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹13,681.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 153.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹13,694.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹572.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 48.45. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹572.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹950.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹950.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹570.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 178.27. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹571.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 175.82. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹2,955.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,665.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 47.09. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,663.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 55.31. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹649.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹649.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹434.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹435.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 83.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹555.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 47.42. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹556.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹601.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹602.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,227.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹9,894.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 189.17. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹9,901.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 189.35. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,249.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,249.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,859.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,864.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SJS.NS trades at ₹1,841.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.87. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SJS.BO trades at ₹1,843.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹6,001.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹142.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹142.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹6,005.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹414.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹415.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹943.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹943.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹801.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹798.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.30. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,593.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,592.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹137.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹136.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 49.08. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹218.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹218.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹4,125.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 114.15. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹4,112.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 113.13. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while AUTOAXLES.BO trades at ₹2,004.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas AUTOAXLES.BO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUTOAXLES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹2,013.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹538.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹489.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹488.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹279.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹279.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here

OLECTRA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OLECTRA.NS stands at 83.3B. In comparison, DIVGIITTS.BO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, OLECTRA.NS is priced at ₹1,011.80, while DIVGIITTS.BO trades at ₹752.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OLECTRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.14, whereas DIVGIITTS.BO's P/E ratio is 79.01. In terms of profitability, OLECTRA.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIVGIITTS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLECTRA.NS is less volatile compared to DIVGIITTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLECTRA.NS.Check DIVGIITTS.BO's competition here