Orla Mining Ltd.
Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OLA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLA.TO | CA$13.68 | -4.27% | 4.5B | 36.05 | CA$0.38 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$87.44 | -2.95% | 96B | 11.64 | CA$7.51 | +1.59% |
| AEM.TO | CA$169.98 | -2.27% | 85.9B | 26.56 | CA$6.40 | +1.32% |
| WPM.TO | CA$125.98 | -2.21% | 57.2B | 67.73 | CA$1.86 | +0.71% |
| ABX.TO | CA$29.39 | -1.51% | 50.6B | 16.34 | CA$1.80 | +2.43% |
| FNV.TO | CA$220.53 | -1.22% | 42.5B | 50.36 | CA$4.38 | +0.94% |
| K.TO | CA$21.55 | -2.40% | 26.5B | 16.22 | CA$1.33 | +0.78% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$63.70 | -1.73% | 15.4B | 21.09 | CA$3.02 | +3.44% |
| AGI.TO | CA$34.78 | -2.00% | 14.6B | 41.40 | CA$0.84 | +0.40% |
Stock Comparison
OLA.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NGT.TO trades at CA$87.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NGT.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while AEM.TO trades at CA$169.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check AEM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while WPM.TO trades at CA$125.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 67.73. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check WPM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ABX.TO trades at CA$29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ABX.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while FNV.TO trades at CA$220.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check FNV.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs K.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while K.TO trades at CA$21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check K.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NCM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while LUG.TO trades at CA$63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check LUG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while AGI.TO trades at CA$34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check AGI.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while EDV.TO trades at CA$41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -73.39. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check EDV.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check YRI.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs OR.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while OR.TO trades at CA$37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 164.91. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check OR.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check EQX.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check BTO.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ELD.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check IMG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NGD.TO trades at CA$5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NGD.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while OGC.TO trades at CA$19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check OGC.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check PRU.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while DPM.TO trades at CA$22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check DPM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 91.93. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SSL.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while TXG.TO trades at CA$41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check TXG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check KNT.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CEE.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs NG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NG.TO trades at CA$7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -20.49. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ORA.TO trades at CA$33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -18.92. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ORA.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CXB.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while WDO.TO trades at CA$16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check WDO.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check WGX.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SEA.TO trades at CA$21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -143.73. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SEA.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs CG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 41.13. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check OSK.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SBB.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check KRR.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while RUP.TO trades at CA$4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -163.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check RUP.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CNL.TO trades at CA$12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CNL.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 811.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ASE.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 764.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check MSA.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs AR.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check AR.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 653.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -67.75. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 649.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check IAU.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 590.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ORE.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 515.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while GAU.TO trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check GAU.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs MND.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while MND.TO trades at CA$4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check MND.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check PRB.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SGD.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs FDR.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 333.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -54.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check FDR.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 313.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -50.33. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ITH.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check STGO.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check JAG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SBI.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 222.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check DNG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs FF.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 181.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check FF.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check LGD.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs G.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while G.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check G.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check BSX.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 130.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -27.60. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ELO.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check TNX.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs COG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check COG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs LN.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check LN.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 106.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NEXG.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SANU.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 102.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check STLR.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check MAW.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check XTG.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs CBR.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -8.87. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CBR.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 85.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check GHRT.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CCM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SIG.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check VEIN.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs CGC.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CGC.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs TML.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check TML.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs HMR.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check HMR.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ESM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check USGD.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs ME.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check ME.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NOM.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NHK.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check AMM.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check BNN.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs VLC.V Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check VLC.V's competition here
OLA.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check NVO.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check GRC.TO's competition here
OLA.TO vs QIM.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check QIM.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs RISE.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check RISE.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs IRV.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check IRV.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check HWG.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check CTOC.CN's competition here
OLA.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison July 2025
OLA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OLA.TO stands at 4.5B. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OLA.TO is priced at CA$13.68, while YRB.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OLA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 36.05, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, OLA.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OLA.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OLA.TO.Check YRB.TO's competition here