Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG
Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG (O2D.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (O2D.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O2D.DE | €2.43 | +2.97% | 7.2B | 27.00 | €0.09 | +7.41% |
| TM5.DE | €186.26 | -0.15% | 208.3B | 22.28 | €8.36 | +1.75% |
| BAC.DE | €44.07 | +1.00% | 185.9B | 12.59 | €3.50 | +5.35% |
| CTM.F | €8.56 | +0.00% | 177.3B | 10.19 | €0.84 | +6.78% |
| SOBA.DE | €23.68 | +1.33% | 165.8B | 9.04 | €2.62 | +4.04% |
| DTE.DE | €32.80 | +0.34% | 158.7B | 16.65 | €1.97 | +2.74% |
| SFT.F | €19.60 | -5.88% | 111.9B | 6.73 | €2.92 | +0.31% |
| CTP2.DE | €26.08 | -1.16% | 94.3B | 5.62 | €4.64 | +4.01% |
| FTE.DE | €17.26 | +1.80% | 45.9B | 86.30 | €0.20 | +4.35% |
| AISF.F | €9.75 | +0.52% | 29B | 22.16 | €0.44 | +9.50% |
Stock Comparison
O2D.DE vs TM5.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TM5.DE has a market cap of 208.3B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TM5.DE trades at €186.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TM5.DE's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TM5.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TM5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TM5.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs BAC.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BAC.DE has a market cap of 185.9B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while BAC.DE trades at €44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas BAC.DE's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAC.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to BAC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check BAC.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs CTM.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CTM.F has a market cap of 177.3B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while CTM.F trades at €8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas CTM.F's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTM.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to CTM.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check CTM.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs SOBA.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SOBA.DE has a market cap of 165.8B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while SOBA.DE trades at €23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SOBA.DE's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOBA.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to SOBA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check SOBA.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs DTE.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DTE.DE has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while DTE.DE trades at €32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas DTE.DE's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DTE.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to DTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check DTE.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs SFT.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SFT.F has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while SFT.F trades at €19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SFT.F's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFT.F's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is less volatile compared to SFT.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check SFT.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs CTP2.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CTP2.DE has a market cap of 94.3B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while CTP2.DE trades at €26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas CTP2.DE's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CTP2.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to CTP2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check CTP2.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs FTE.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FTE.DE has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while FTE.DE trades at €17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas FTE.DE's P/E ratio is 86.30. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FTE.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to FTE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check FTE.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs AISF.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AISF.F has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while AISF.F trades at €9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas AISF.F's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AISF.F's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to AISF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check AISF.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs VODI.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VODI.DE has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while VODI.DE trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas VODI.DE's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VODI.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to VODI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check VODI.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs BTQ.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BTQ.DE has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while BTQ.DE trades at €2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas BTQ.DE's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTQ.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to BTQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check BTQ.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs TNE5.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TNE5.DE has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TNE5.DE trades at €3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TNE5.DE's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNE5.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TNE5.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TNE5.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs SWTF.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SWTF.F has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while SWTF.F trades at €2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas SWTF.F's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWTF.F's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to SWTF.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check SWTF.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs TA1.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TA1.DE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TA1.DE trades at €9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TA1.DE's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TA1.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TA1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TA1.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs TA1.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TA1.F has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TA1.F trades at €9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TA1.F's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TA1.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TA1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TA1.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs TQI.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TQI.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TQI.DE trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TQI.DE's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TQI.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TQI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TQI.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs TQIR.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TQIR.DE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TQIR.DE trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TQIR.DE's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TQIR.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TQIR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TQIR.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs UTDI.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UTDI.DE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while UTDI.DE trades at €27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas UTDI.DE's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UTDI.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to UTDI.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check UTDI.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs TAFG.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TAFG.F has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TAFG.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TAFG.F's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TAFG.F's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TAFG.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TAFG.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs 1U1.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 1U1.DE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while 1U1.DE trades at €25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas 1U1.DE's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 1U1.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to 1U1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check 1U1.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs FNTN.HM Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FNTN.HM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while FNTN.HM trades at €27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas FNTN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNTN.HM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.HM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check FNTN.HM's competition here
O2D.DE vs FNTN.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FNTN.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while FNTN.DE trades at €27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas FNTN.DE's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FNTN.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to FNTN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check FNTN.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs JASN.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, JASN.F has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while JASN.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas JASN.F's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JASN.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to JASN.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check JASN.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs 4HW.F Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, 4HW.F has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while 4HW.F trades at €2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas 4HW.F's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 4HW.F's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to 4HW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check 4HW.F's competition here
O2D.DE vs E4C.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, E4C.DE has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while E4C.DE trades at €9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas E4C.DE's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to E4C.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is less volatile compared to E4C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check E4C.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs LSX.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LSX.DE has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while LSX.DE trades at €3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas LSX.DE's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSX.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to LSX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check LSX.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs TGT.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TGT.DE has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TGT.DE trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TGT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGT.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is less volatile compared to TGT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TGT.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs C1V.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, C1V.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while C1V.DE trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas C1V.DE's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to C1V.DE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is less volatile compared to C1V.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check C1V.DE's competition here
O2D.DE vs TH51.MU Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TH51.MU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TH51.MU trades at €2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TH51.MU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TH51.MU's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TH51.MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TH51.MU's competition here
O2D.DE vs TC1.DE Comparison March 2026
O2D.DE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, O2D.DE stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, O2D.DE is priced at €2.43, while TC1.DE trades at €3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
O2D.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.00, whereas TC1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, O2D.DE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TC1.DE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, O2D.DE is more volatile compared to TC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for O2D.DE.Check TC1.DE's competition here