Rocket Fuel, Inc.
Rocket Fuel, Inc. (FUEL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FUEL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUEL | $2.60 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VRSK | $171.11 | -0.29% | 22.4B | 26.08 | $6.56 | +1.08% |
| NTSK | $11.75 | +1.56% | 4.7B | -3.69 | -$3.18 | N/A |
| TCGL | $172.84 | +0.00% | 3.5B | -5761.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ZSQR | $8.98 | +10.05% | 55.9M | -3.19 | -$2.81 | N/A |
| ZTG | $2.98 | +2.76% | 35.2M | 29.80 | $0.10 | N/A |
| GIFT | $0.90 | +0.00% | 30.7M | -2.81 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| QCLS | $4.18 | +2.45% | 7.4M | -0.49 | -$8.49 | N/A |
| RPGL | $0.29 | +5.92% | 12.5K | 2.23 | $0.13 | N/A |
| ACTA | $1.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FUEL vs VRSK Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while VRSK trades at $171.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check VRSK's competition here
FUEL vs NTSK Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while NTSK trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check NTSK's competition here
FUEL vs TCGL Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while TCGL trades at $172.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check TCGL's competition here
FUEL vs ZSQR Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, ZSQR has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while ZSQR trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSQR's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZSQR's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to ZSQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check ZSQR's competition here
FUEL vs ZTG Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while ZTG trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check ZTG's competition here
FUEL vs GIFT Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while GIFT trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check GIFT's competition here
FUEL vs QCLS Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while QCLS trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check QCLS's competition here
FUEL vs RPGL Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while RPGL trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check RPGL's competition here
FUEL vs ACTA Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while ACTA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is less volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check ACTA's competition here
FUEL vs PRGY Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while PRGY trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FUEL has daily volatility of 0.77 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here
FUEL vs CRTN Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while CRTN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check CRTN's competition here
FUEL vs CSC Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while CSC trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check CSC's competition here
FUEL vs DWCH Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while DWCH trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check DWCH's competition here
FUEL vs CALD Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while CALD trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check CALD's competition here
FUEL vs CRA Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while CRA trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FUEL has daily volatility of 0.77 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here
FUEL vs XTLY Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while XTLY trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check XTLY's competition here
FUEL vs IMPV Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while IMPV trades at $55.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check IMPV's competition here
FUEL vs RMGN Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while RMGN trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check RMGN's competition here
FUEL vs DWRE Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while DWRE trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check DWRE's competition here
FUEL vs DST Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while DST trades at $83.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check DST's competition here
FUEL vs HDP Comparison May 2026
FUEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUEL stands at 0. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUEL is priced at $2.60, while HDP trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUEL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUEL's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FUEL is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUEL.Check HDP's competition here