Northern Ocean Ltd.
Northern Ocean Ltd. NTNOF Peers
See (NTNOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Drilling Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTNOF | $0.66 | N/A | 199.52M | -2.35 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| YZCFF | $0.07 | N/A | 3.23B | 6.54 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ESVIF | $1.50 | +11.58% | 276.47M | -18.77 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| PHXHF | $5.73 | +1.10% | 260.87M | 6.82 | $0.84 | +10.00% |
| SHLLF | $0.89 | +9.38% | 227.16M | 5.54 | $0.16 | N/A |
| ARHVF | $2.13 | N/A | 192.85M | -5.76 | -$0.37 | N/A |
| VTDRF | $12.05 | +0.42% | 160.21M | -4.23 | -$2.85 | N/A |
| CETEF | $3.45 | -6.50% | 117.06M | 3.17 | $1.09 | N/A |
| DODRW | $0.54 | +3.85% | 55.23M | -0.03 | -$19.13 | N/A |
| WEEEF | $1.50 | N/A | 50.76M | -12.50 | -$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTNOF vs YZCFF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, YZCFF has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while YZCFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas YZCFF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to YZCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to YZCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs ESVIF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, ESVIF has a market cap of 276.47M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while ESVIF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ESVIF's P/E ratio is -18.77. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ESVIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to ESVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs PHXHF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, PHXHF has a market cap of 260.87M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while PHXHF trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas PHXHF's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to PHXHF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to PHXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs SHLLF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, SHLLF has a market cap of 227.16M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while SHLLF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas SHLLF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHLLF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to SHLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs ARHVF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, ARHVF has a market cap of 192.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while ARHVF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ARHVF's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARHVF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to ARHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs VTDRF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, VTDRF has a market cap of 160.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while VTDRF trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas VTDRF's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to VTDRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is less volatile compared to VTDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs CETEF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, CETEF has a market cap of 117.06M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while CETEF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas CETEF's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to CETEF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to CETEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs DODRW Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, DODRW has a market cap of 55.23M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while DODRW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas DODRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to DODRW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to DODRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs WEEEF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, WEEEF has a market cap of 50.76M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while WEEEF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas WEEEF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEEEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to WEEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs AKTAF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, AKTAF has a market cap of 50.34M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while AKTAF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas AKTAF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to AKTAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to AKTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs AGDY Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, AGDY has a market cap of 16.37M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while AGDY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas AGDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to AGDY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to AGDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs NBLWF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, NBLWF has a market cap of 8.73M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while NBLWF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas NBLWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to NBLWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to NBLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs AWLCF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, AWLCF has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while AWLCF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas AWLCF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to AWLCF's ROE of +3.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to AWLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs ENSRF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, ENSRF has a market cap of 557933.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while ENSRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ENSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ENSRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to ENSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs PDGO Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, PDGO has a market cap of 354049.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while PDGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas PDGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to PDGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to PDGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs WBRE Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, WBRE has a market cap of 111951.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while WBRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas WBRE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to WBRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is less volatile compared to WBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs EXLA Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, EXLA has a market cap of 73800.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while EXLA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas EXLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXLA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to EXLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs VTGDF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, VTGDF has a market cap of 31163.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while VTGDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas VTGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to VTGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to VTGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs TSCAF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, TSCAF has a market cap of 5064.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while TSCAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas TSCAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to TSCAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is less volatile compared to TSCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs TISDZ Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, TISDZ has a market cap of 4257.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while TISDZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas TISDZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to TISDZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to TISDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs BRCOQ Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, BRCOQ has a market cap of 2002.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while BRCOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas BRCOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to BRCOQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is more volatile compared to BRCOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs FRGY Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, FRGY has a market cap of 1884.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while FRGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas FRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is less volatile compared to FRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.
NTNOF vs ENYNF Comparison
NTNOF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTNOF stands at 199.52M. In comparison, ENYNF has a market cap of 429.00. Regarding current trading prices, NTNOF is priced at $0.66, while ENYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTNOF currently has a P/E ratio of -2.35, whereas ENYNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTNOF's ROE is N/A, compared to ENYNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NTNOF is less volatile compared to ENYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTNOF.