Awilco Drilling PLC
Awilco Drilling PLC (AWLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AWLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Drilling Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWLCF | $1.81 | +0.00% | 44.8M | 0.10 | $19.00 | N/A |
| YZCFF | $0.19 | +52.82% | 3.6B | 19.24 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ESVIF | $3.02 | +7.09% | 557.3M | -14.40 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| SHLLF | $1.70 | +0.00% | 435.8M | 3.40 | $0.50 | N/A |
| PHXHF | $8.22 | +1.61% | 372.9M | 12.65 | $0.65 | +8.93% |
| ARHVF | $2.80 | +0.00% | 278.6M | -4.44 | -$0.63 | +8.81% |
| VTDRF | $18.25 | +0.00% | 247.5M | -7.67 | -$2.38 | +27.40% |
| NTNOF | $0.58 | -3.33% | 175.9M | -3.62 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| AKTAF | $3.33 | +2.46% | 121.7M | 66.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| CETEF | $3.41 | +0.89% | 114.4M | 3.34 | $1.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AWLCF vs YZCFF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, YZCFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while YZCFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas YZCFF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to YZCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to YZCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check YZCFF's competition here
AWLCF vs ESVIF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ESVIF has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ESVIF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ESVIF's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ESVIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to ESVIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ESVIF's competition here
AWLCF vs SHLLF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, SHLLF has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while SHLLF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas SHLLF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to SHLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to SHLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check SHLLF's competition here
AWLCF vs PHXHF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, PHXHF has a market cap of 372.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while PHXHF trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas PHXHF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to PHXHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to PHXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check PHXHF's competition here
AWLCF vs ARHVF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ARHVF has a market cap of 278.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ARHVF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ARHVF's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ARHVF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to ARHVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ARHVF's competition here
AWLCF vs VTDRF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, VTDRF has a market cap of 247.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while VTDRF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas VTDRF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to VTDRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to VTDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check VTDRF's competition here
AWLCF vs NTNOF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NTNOF has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NTNOF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NTNOF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NTNOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to NTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NTNOF's competition here
AWLCF vs AKTAF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, AKTAF has a market cap of 121.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while AKTAF trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas AKTAF's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to AKTAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to AKTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check AKTAF's competition here
AWLCF vs CETEF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, CETEF has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while CETEF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas CETEF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to CETEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to CETEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check CETEF's competition here
AWLCF vs WEEEF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, WEEEF has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while WEEEF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas WEEEF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to WEEEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to WEEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check WEEEF's competition here
AWLCF vs DODRW Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, DODRW has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while DODRW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas DODRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to DODRW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to DODRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check DODRW's competition here
AWLCF vs AGDY Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, AGDY has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while AGDY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas AGDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to AGDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to AGDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check AGDY's competition here
AWLCF vs NBLWF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NBLWF has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NBLWF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NBLWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NBLWF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NBLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NBLWF's competition here
AWLCF vs ENSRF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ENSRF has a market cap of 557.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ENSRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ENSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ENSRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to ENSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ENSRF's competition here
AWLCF vs PDGO Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, PDGO has a market cap of 389.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while PDGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas PDGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to PDGO's ROE of +9.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to PDGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check PDGO's competition here
AWLCF vs WBRE Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, WBRE has a market cap of 112K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while WBRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas WBRE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to WBRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to WBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check WBRE's competition here
AWLCF vs EXLA Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, EXLA has a market cap of 73.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while EXLA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas EXLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to EXLA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to EXLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check EXLA's competition here
AWLCF vs VTGDF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, VTGDF has a market cap of 31.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while VTGDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas VTGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to VTGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to VTGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check VTGDF's competition here
AWLCF vs TSCAF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, TSCAF has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while TSCAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas TSCAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to TSCAF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to TSCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check TSCAF's competition here
AWLCF vs TISDZ Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, TISDZ has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while TISDZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas TISDZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to TISDZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to TISDZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check TISDZ's competition here
AWLCF vs BRCOQ Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, BRCOQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while BRCOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas BRCOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to BRCOQ's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to BRCOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check BRCOQ's competition here
AWLCF vs FRGY Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, FRGY has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while FRGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas FRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to FRGY's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to FRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check FRGY's competition here
AWLCF vs ENYNF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, ENYNF has a market cap of 429. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while ENYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas ENYNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to ENYNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is less volatile compared to ENYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check ENYNF's competition here
AWLCF vs NBLTF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NBLTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NBLTF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NBLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NBLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NBLTF's competition here
AWLCF vs JSTS Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, JSTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while JSTS trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas JSTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to JSTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to JSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check JSTS's competition here
AWLCF vs NBLRF Comparison May 2026
AWLCF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AWLCF stands at 44.8M. In comparison, NBLRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AWLCF is priced at $1.81, while NBLRF trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AWLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.10, whereas NBLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AWLCF's ROE is -1.67%, compared to NBLRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AWLCF is more volatile compared to NBLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AWLCF.Check NBLRF's competition here