Noble Corporation Plc
Noble Corporation Plc (NBLWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NBLWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Drilling Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBLWF | $0.03 | -45.00% | 4.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| YZCFF | $0.19 | +52.82% | 3.6B | 19.24 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ESVIF | $2.82 | +2.92% | 523.2M | -18.93 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| SHLLF | $1.70 | +0.00% | 435.8M | 3.40 | $0.50 | N/A |
| PHXHF | $8.09 | -4.26% | 368.4M | 12.49 | $0.65 | +8.91% |
| ARHVF | $2.91 | +3.93% | 298.1M | -4.76 | -$0.63 | +8.23% |
| VTDRF | $18.25 | +0.00% | 247.5M | -7.67 | -$2.38 | +27.40% |
| NTNOF | $0.60 | +0.00% | 181.9M | -3.75 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| AKTAF | $3.25 | +0.88% | 121M | 65.60 | $0.05 | N/A |
| CETEF | $3.41 | +0.89% | 114.4M | 3.34 | $1.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NBLWF vs YZCFF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, YZCFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while YZCFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YZCFF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YZCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and YZCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YZCFF's competition here
NBLWF vs ESVIF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ESVIF has a market cap of 523.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while ESVIF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESVIF's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESVIF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to ESVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check ESVIF's competition here
NBLWF vs SHLLF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, SHLLF has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while SHLLF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHLLF's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to SHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check SHLLF's competition here
NBLWF vs PHXHF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PHXHF has a market cap of 368.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while PHXHF trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHXHF's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHXHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to PHXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check PHXHF's competition here
NBLWF vs ARHVF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ARHVF has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while ARHVF trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHVF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARHVF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to ARHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check ARHVF's competition here
NBLWF vs VTDRF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VTDRF has a market cap of 247.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while VTDRF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTDRF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTDRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and VTDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTDRF's competition here
NBLWF vs NTNOF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, NTNOF has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while NTNOF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNOF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTNOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and NTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NTNOF's competition here
NBLWF vs AKTAF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AKTAF has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while AKTAF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKTAF's P/E ratio is 65.60. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKTAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to AKTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check AKTAF's competition here
NBLWF vs CETEF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, CETEF has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while CETEF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CETEF's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CETEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to CETEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check CETEF's competition here
NBLWF vs WEEEF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, WEEEF has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while WEEEF trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEEEF's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEEEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and WEEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEEEF's competition here
NBLWF vs DODRW Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, DODRW has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while DODRW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DODRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DODRW's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and DODRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DODRW's competition here
NBLWF vs AWLCF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AWLCF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while AWLCF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWLCF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AWLCF's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to AWLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check AWLCF's competition here
NBLWF vs AGDY Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, AGDY has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while AGDY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to AGDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check AGDY's competition here
NBLWF vs ENSRF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ENSRF has a market cap of 557.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while ENSRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENSRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENSRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and ENSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENSRF's competition here
NBLWF vs PDGO Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, PDGO has a market cap of 389.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while PDGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PDGO's ROE of +9.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to PDGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check PDGO's competition here
NBLWF vs WBRE Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, WBRE has a market cap of 112K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while WBRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBRE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBRE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to WBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check WBRE's competition here
NBLWF vs EXLA Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, EXLA has a market cap of 73.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while EXLA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXLA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and EXLA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXLA's competition here
NBLWF vs VTGDF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, VTGDF has a market cap of 31.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while VTGDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTGDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and VTGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTGDF's competition here
NBLWF vs TSCAF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TSCAF has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while TSCAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSCAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSCAF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and TSCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSCAF's competition here
NBLWF vs TISDZ Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, TISDZ has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while TISDZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TISDZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TISDZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and TISDZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TISDZ's competition here
NBLWF vs BRCOQ Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, BRCOQ has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while BRCOQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRCOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRCOQ's ROE of -2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and BRCOQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRCOQ's competition here
NBLWF vs FRGY Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, FRGY has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while FRGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRGY's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to FRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check FRGY's competition here
NBLWF vs ENYNF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, ENYNF has a market cap of 429. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while ENYNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENYNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENYNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to ENYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check ENYNF's competition here
NBLWF vs NBLTF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, NBLTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while NBLTF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and NBLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBLTF's competition here
NBLWF vs JSTS Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, JSTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while JSTS trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSTS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF and JSTS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSTS's competition here
NBLWF vs NBLRF Comparison May 2026
NBLWF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBLWF stands at 4.4M. In comparison, NBLRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NBLWF is priced at $0.03, while NBLRF trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBLWF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBLRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBLWF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBLRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBLWF is less volatile compared to NBLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBLWF.Check NBLRF's competition here