NT Minerals Limited (NTM.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTM.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTM.AX | A$0.00 | +0.00% | 3.6M | -0.37 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| CSC.AX | A$13.38 | +0.90% | 10.2B | 34.48 | A$0.39 | N/A |
| OZL.AX | A$28.19 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 45.47 | A$0.62 | +0.28% |
| SFR.AX | A$19.19 | +0.95% | 9B | 33.97 | A$0.56 | N/A |
| MAC.AX | A$18.52 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -23.74 | -A$0.78 | N/A |
| WA1.AX | A$11.40 | +1.51% | 846.8M | -111.69 | -A$0.10 | N/A |
| C6C.AX | A$2.79 | +1.45% | 598.1M | -9.62 | -A$0.29 | N/A |
| HCH.AX | A$1.99 | +1.02% | 300.6M | -37.76 | -A$0.05 | N/A |
| GRX.AX | A$0.90 | -6.25% | 280.2M | -21.63 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| TM1.AX | A$0.29 | +7.55% | 221.2M | -581.63 | -A$0.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTM.AX vs CSC.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CSC.AX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CSC.AX trades at A$13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas CSC.AX's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CSC.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check CSC.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs OZL.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, OZL.AX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while OZL.AX trades at A$28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas OZL.AX's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to OZL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to OZL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check OZL.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs SFR.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, SFR.AX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SFR.AX trades at A$19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas SFR.AX's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to SFR.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to SFR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check SFR.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs MAC.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, MAC.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAC.AX trades at A$18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas MAC.AX's P/E ratio is -23.74. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to MAC.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to MAC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check MAC.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs WA1.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, WA1.AX has a market cap of 846.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while WA1.AX trades at A$11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas WA1.AX's P/E ratio is -111.69. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to WA1.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to WA1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check WA1.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs C6C.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, C6C.AX has a market cap of 598.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while C6C.AX trades at A$2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas C6C.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to C6C.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to C6C.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check C6C.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs HCH.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, HCH.AX has a market cap of 300.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HCH.AX trades at A$1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas HCH.AX's P/E ratio is -37.76. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to HCH.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to HCH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check HCH.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs GRX.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, GRX.AX has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GRX.AX trades at A$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas GRX.AX's P/E ratio is -21.63. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to GRX.AX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to GRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check GRX.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs TM1.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, TM1.AX has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TM1.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas TM1.AX's P/E ratio is -581.63. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to TM1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to TM1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check TM1.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs KCC.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, KCC.AX has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KCC.AX trades at A$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas KCC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to KCC.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to KCC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check KCC.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs CVV.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CVV.AX has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CVV.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas CVV.AX's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CVV.AX's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CVV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check CVV.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs CYM.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CYM.AX has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CYM.AX trades at A$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas CYM.AX's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CYM.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CYM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check CYM.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs TNC.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, TNC.AX has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TNC.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas TNC.AX's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to TNC.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to TNC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check TNC.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs AR1.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, AR1.AX has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AR1.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas AR1.AX's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to AR1.AX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to AR1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check AR1.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs RRR.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, RRR.AX has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RRR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas RRR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to RRR.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to RRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check RRR.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs ALM.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, ALM.AX has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ALM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas ALM.AX's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to ALM.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to ALM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check ALM.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs CSE.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CSE.AX has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CSE.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas CSE.AX's P/E ratio is -3875.00. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CSE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check CSE.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs CCZ.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CCZ.AX has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CCZ.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas CCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CCZ.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check CCZ.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs SLM.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, SLM.AX has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SLM.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas SLM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to SLM.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to SLM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check SLM.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs NFM.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, NFM.AX has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NFM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas NFM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to NFM.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to NFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check NFM.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs NRX.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, NRX.AX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NRX.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas NRX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to NRX.AX's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to NRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check NRX.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs REC.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, REC.AX has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while REC.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas REC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to REC.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to REC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check REC.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs CPO.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, CPO.AX has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CPO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas CPO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CPO.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CPO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.Check CPO.AX's competition here
NTM.AX vs RDS.AX Comparison July 2026
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 3.6M. In comparison, RDS.AX has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RDS.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.37, whereas RDS.AX's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -1.76%, compared to RDS.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX and RDS.AX have similar daily volatility (40.00).Check RDS.AX's competition here