Redstone Resources Limited (RDS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS.AX | A$0.00 | +0.00% | 3.1M | -300.00 | -A$0.00 | N/A |
| CSC.AX | A$13.10 | -0.53% | 10B | 33.76 | A$0.39 | N/A |
| OZL.AX | A$28.19 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 45.47 | A$0.62 | +0.28% |
| SFR.AX | A$18.89 | -0.42% | 8.8B | 33.44 | A$0.56 | N/A |
| MAC.AX | A$18.52 | +0.00% | 1.5B | -23.74 | -A$0.78 | N/A |
| WA1.AX | A$11.32 | -3.17% | 840.9M | -110.90 | -A$0.10 | N/A |
| C6C.AX | A$2.79 | +1.45% | 598.1M | -9.62 | -A$0.29 | N/A |
| HCH.AX | A$1.90 | +2.15% | 287M | -36.05 | -A$0.05 | N/A |
| GRX.AX | A$0.92 | -1.60% | 286.4M | -22.12 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| KCC.AX | A$0.70 | -7.89% | 204.2M | -11.06 | -A$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RDS.AX vs CSC.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, CSC.AX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CSC.AX trades at A$13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas CSC.AX's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSC.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check CSC.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs OZL.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, OZL.AX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while OZL.AX trades at A$28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas OZL.AX's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OZL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to OZL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check OZL.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs SFR.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, SFR.AX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SFR.AX trades at A$18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas SFR.AX's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SFR.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to SFR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check SFR.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs MAC.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, MAC.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAC.AX trades at A$18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas MAC.AX's P/E ratio is -23.74. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MAC.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to MAC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check MAC.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs WA1.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, WA1.AX has a market cap of 840.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while WA1.AX trades at A$11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas WA1.AX's P/E ratio is -110.90. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WA1.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to WA1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check WA1.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs C6C.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, C6C.AX has a market cap of 598.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while C6C.AX trades at A$2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas C6C.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to C6C.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to C6C.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check C6C.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs HCH.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, HCH.AX has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HCH.AX trades at A$1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas HCH.AX's P/E ratio is -36.05. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HCH.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to HCH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check HCH.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs GRX.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, GRX.AX has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GRX.AX trades at A$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas GRX.AX's P/E ratio is -22.12. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRX.AX's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to GRX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check GRX.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs KCC.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, KCC.AX has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KCC.AX trades at A$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas KCC.AX's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KCC.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to KCC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check KCC.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs TM1.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, TM1.AX has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TM1.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas TM1.AX's P/E ratio is -500.00. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TM1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to TM1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check TM1.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs CVV.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, CVV.AX has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CVV.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas CVV.AX's P/E ratio is -13.76. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVV.AX's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CVV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check CVV.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs CYM.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, CYM.AX has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CYM.AX trades at A$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas CYM.AX's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CYM.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CYM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check CYM.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs TNC.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, TNC.AX has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TNC.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas TNC.AX's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TNC.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to TNC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check TNC.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs AR1.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, AR1.AX has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AR1.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas AR1.AX's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AR1.AX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to AR1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check AR1.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs RRR.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, RRR.AX has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RRR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas RRR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RRR.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to RRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check RRR.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs ALM.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, ALM.AX has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ALM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas ALM.AX's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALM.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and ALM.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALM.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs CSE.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, CSE.AX has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CSE.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas CSE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check CSE.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs CCZ.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, CCZ.AX has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CCZ.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas CCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCZ.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and CCZ.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCZ.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs SLM.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, SLM.AX has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SLM.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas SLM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLM.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to SLM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check SLM.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs NFM.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, NFM.AX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NFM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas NFM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NFM.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to NFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check NFM.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs REC.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, REC.AX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while REC.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas REC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to REC.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to REC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check REC.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs NRX.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, NRX.AX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NRX.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas NRX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NRX.AX's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX and NRX.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRX.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs CPO.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, CPO.AX has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CPO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas CPO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CPO.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to CPO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check CPO.AX's competition here
RDS.AX vs NTM.AX Comparison July 2026
RDS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDS.AX stands at 3.1M. In comparison, NTM.AX has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NTM.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -300.00, whereas NTM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RDS.AX's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTM.AX's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RDS.AX is less volatile compared to NTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDS.AX.Check NTM.AX's competition here