Meyka Pro banner
NT Minerals Limited

NT Minerals Limited Fundamental Analysis (ASX: NTM.AX)

NTM.AXASX
$0.003
$0.00(0.00%)
Australian Market opens in 13h 22m

NT Minerals Limited Fundamental Analysis (ASX: NTM.AX)

NT Minerals Limited (ASX: NTM.AX) shows weak financial fundamentals with a PE ratio of -1.11, profit margin of 0.00%, and ROE of -86.30%. The company generates N/A in annual revenue with N/A year-over-year growth of N/A.

Key Strengths

Cash Position55.20%
PEG Ratio-0.06
Current Ratio2.60

Areas of Concern

ROE-86.30%
Operating Margin0.00%
We analyze NTM.AX's fundamental strength across five key dimensions.

The stock receives a Fundamental Health Score of -70.4/100 based on profitability, valuation, growth, and balance sheet metrics. The F grade reflects weak fundamentals and significant financial concerns.

Fundamental Health Score

F
-70.4/100

We analyze NTM.AX's fundamental strength across five key dimensions:

Efficiency Score

Weak

NTM.AX struggles to generate sufficient returns from assets.

ROA > 10%
-70.99%

Valuation Score

Excellent

NTM.AX trades at attractive valuation levels.

PE < 25
-1.11
PEG Ratio < 2
-0.06

Growth Score

Weak

NTM.AX faces weak or negative growth trends.

Revenue Growth > 5%
N/A
EPS Growth > 10%
N/A

Financial Health Score

Excellent

NTM.AX maintains a strong and stable balance sheet.

Debt/Equity < 1
0.01
Current Ratio > 1
2.60

Profitability Score

Weak

NTM.AX struggles to sustain strong margins.

ROE > 15%
-8630.10%
Net Margin ≥ 15%
0.00%
Positive Free Cash Flow
No

Key Financial Metrics

Is NTM.AX Expensive or Cheap?

P/E Ratio

NTM.AX trades at -1.11 times earnings. This suggests potential undervaluation.

-1.11

PEG Ratio

When adjusting for growth, NTM.AX's PEG of -0.06 indicates potential undervaluation.

-0.06

Price to Book

The market values NT Minerals Limited at 0.96 times its book value. This may indicate undervaluation.

0.96

EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value stands at -1.29 times EBITDA. This is generally considered low.

-1.29

How Well Does NTM.AX Make Money?

Net Profit Margin

For every $100 in sales, NT Minerals Limited keeps $0.00 as profit after all expenses.

0.00%

Operating Margin

Core operations generate 0.00 in profit for every $100 in revenue, before interest and taxes.

0.00%

ROE

Management delivers $-86.30 in profit for every $100 of shareholder equity.

-86.30%

ROA

NT Minerals Limited generates $-70.99 in profit for every $100 in assets, demonstrating efficient asset deployment.

-70.99%

Following the Money - Real Cash Generation

FCF Per Share

Each share generates $-0.00 in free cash annually.

$-0.00

FCF Yield

NTM.AX converts -42.26% of its market value into free cash.

-42.26%

Financial Ratios Analysis

Valuation Ratios

P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

-1.11

vs 25 benchmark

PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

-0.06

vs 25 benchmark

P/B Ratio

Price to book value ratio

0.96

vs 25 benchmark

P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

0.00

vs 25 benchmark

Financial Health

Debt/Equity

Total debt to shareholders' equity

0.005

vs 25 benchmark

Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

2.60

vs 25 benchmark

Efficiency Ratios

ROE

Return on equity percentage

-0.86

vs 25 benchmark

ROA

Return on assets percentage

-0.71

vs 25 benchmark

ROCE

Return on capital employed

-0.41

vs 25 benchmark

How NTM.AX Stacks Against Its Sector Peers

MetricNTM.AX ValueSector AveragePerformance
P/E Ratio-1.1127.26 Better (Cheaper)
ROE-86.30%1203.00% Weak
Net Margin0.00%200.00% Weak
Debt/Equity0.010.74 Strong (Low Leverage)
Current Ratio2.603.29 Strong Liquidity
ROA-70.99%3162.00% Weak

NTM.AX outperforms its industry in 3 out of 6 key metrics, but lagging in ROE.

Historical Growth Performance

5-Year Growth Trajectory

This section reviews NT Minerals Limited's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and compares its performance against the typical investment style of its industry.

Revenue CAGR

N/A

Industry Style: Cyclical, Commodity, Value

EPS CAGR

N/A

Industry Style: Cyclical, Commodity, Value

FCF CAGR

N/A

Industry Style: Cyclical, Commodity, Value

Fundamental Analysis FAQ