NT Minerals Limited
NT Minerals Limited NTM.AX Peers
See (NTM.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTM.AX | $0.00 | N/A | 2.42M | -0.20 | -$0.01 | N/A |
OZL.AX | $28.19 | N/A | 9.51B | 45.47 | $0.62 | N/A |
CSC.AX | $7.62 | -3.42% | 5.81B | -33.13 | -$0.23 | N/A |
SFR.AX | $10.73 | +0.19% | 4.93B | 37.00 | $0.29 | N/A |
WA1.AX | $13.38 | +7.38% | 906.04M | -267.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
C6C.AX | $2.79 | +1.45% | 598.13M | -9.62 | -$0.29 | N/A |
GRX.AX | $0.75 | N/A | 208.51M | -37.25 | -$0.02 | N/A |
CVV.AX | $0.18 | N/A | 100.58M | -18.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
HGO.AX | $0.04 | +5.56% | 99.21M | -3.80 | -$0.01 | N/A |
AR1.AX | $0.16 | -3.03% | 84.35M | -2.29 | -$0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NTM.AX vs OZL.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, OZL.AX has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while OZL.AX trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas OZL.AX's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OZL.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to OZL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs CSC.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, CSC.AX has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while CSC.AX trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CSC.AX's P/E ratio is -33.13. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CSC.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs SFR.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, SFR.AX has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while SFR.AX trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SFR.AX's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SFR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to SFR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs WA1.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, WA1.AX has a market cap of 906.04M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while WA1.AX trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas WA1.AX's P/E ratio is -267.60. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WA1.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to WA1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs C6C.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, C6C.AX has a market cap of 598.13M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while C6C.AX trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas C6C.AX's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to C6C.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to C6C.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs GRX.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, GRX.AX has a market cap of 208.51M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while GRX.AX trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas GRX.AX's P/E ratio is -37.25. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRX.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to GRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs CVV.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, CVV.AX has a market cap of 100.58M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while CVV.AX trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CVV.AX's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CVV.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CVV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs HGO.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, HGO.AX has a market cap of 99.21M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while HGO.AX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HGO.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to HGO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs AR1.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, AR1.AX has a market cap of 84.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while AR1.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas AR1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AR1.AX's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to AR1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs HCH.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, HCH.AX has a market cap of 75.80M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while HCH.AX trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HCH.AX's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HCH.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to HCH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs CYM.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, CYM.AX has a market cap of 51.59M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while CYM.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CYM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CYM.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CYM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs CSE.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, CSE.AX has a market cap of 20.81M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while CSE.AX trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CSE.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CSE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs CCZ.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, CCZ.AX has a market cap of 15.99M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while CCZ.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CCZ.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs KCC.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, KCC.AX has a market cap of 10.98M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while KCC.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas KCC.AX's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KCC.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to KCC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs SLM.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, SLM.AX has a market cap of 10.26M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while SLM.AX trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas SLM.AX's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SLM.AX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to SLM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs NRX.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, NRX.AX has a market cap of 8.91M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while NRX.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas NRX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to NRX.AX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to NRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs RRR.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, RRR.AX has a market cap of 7.74M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while RRR.AX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RRR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RRR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to RRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs ALM.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, ALM.AX has a market cap of 6.35M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while ALM.AX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ALM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ALM.AX's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to ALM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs RDS.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, RDS.AX has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while RDS.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas RDS.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RDS.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to RDS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs REC.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, REC.AX has a market cap of 3.85M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while REC.AX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas REC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to REC.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to REC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.
NTM.AX vs CPO.AX Comparison
NTM.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTM.AX stands at 2.42M. In comparison, CPO.AX has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, NTM.AX is priced at $0.00, while CPO.AX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTM.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CPO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NTM.AX's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CPO.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTM.AX is more volatile compared to CPO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTM.AX.