NetApp, Inc.
NetApp, Inc. NTAP Peers
See (NTAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | $99.27 | -0.40% | 20.5B | 18.38 | $5.40 | +2.11% |
| ANET | $86.37 | -6.92% | 108.5B | 36.44 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $113.58 | -0.17% | 77.7B | 17.80 | $6.38 | +1.64% |
| STX | $118.14 | +0.68% | 25.1B | 17.00 | $6.95 | +2.42% |
| SMCI | $41.16 | -1.91% | 24.6B | 22.37 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $24.95 | -8.29% | 23.5B | 8.97 | $2.78 | +4.54% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | N/A | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| WDC | $52.55 | +0.38% | 18.3B | 18.00 | $2.92 | N/A |
| PSTG | $53.67 | -2.67% | 17.6B | 173.13 | $0.31 | N/A |
| LOGI | $85.09 | +0.57% | 12.6B | 20.60 | $4.13 | +1.61% |
Stock Comparison
NTAP vs ANET Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while ANET trades at $86.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DELL Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while DELL trades at $113.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STX Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while STX trades at $118.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SMCI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while SMCI trades at $41.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs HPQ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while HPQ trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CAJ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs WDC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while WDC trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs PSTG Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while PSTG trades at $53.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 173.13. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs LOGI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while LOGI trades at $85.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs IONQ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while IONQ trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -28.58. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs IONQ-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while IONQ-WT trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SNDKV Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QBTS-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while QBTS-WT trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QBTS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while QBTS trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -24.64. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RGTIW Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while RGTIW trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RGTI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while RGTI trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -16.44. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QUBT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while QUBT trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -23.02. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CRCT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while CRCT trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MKFG-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CRSR Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 953.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while CRSR trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SSYS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 881.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while SSYS trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RCAT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 544.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while RCAT trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs NNDM Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while NNDM trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DDD Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 217.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while DDD trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CAN Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while CAN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs TIO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DM Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MICT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs ZSPC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while ZSPC trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MKFG Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs YIBO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 84.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while YIBO trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QMCO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while QMCO trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs INVE Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 78.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while INVE trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs ALOT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while ALOT trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STRC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to STRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs OSS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while OSS trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs TACT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while TACT trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs FATH Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs KTCC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while KTCC trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs EBON Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while EBON trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SGE Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs UAVS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while UAVS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs VLD Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SCKT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while SCKT trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs VJET Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STRCW Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 20.5B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $99.27, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.38, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.15%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.