NetApp, Inc.
NetApp, Inc. NTAP Peers
See (NTAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | $106.55 | +0.79% | 21.3B | 18.79 | $5.67 | +1.98% |
| ANET | $102.31 | +2.94% | 128.5B | 43.17 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $122.60 | -1.12% | 83.2B | 19.23 | $6.37 | +1.51% |
| STX | $144.33 | +2.04% | 30.6B | 20.77 | $6.95 | +2.03% |
| SMCI | $49.01 | +3.01% | 29.3B | 26.64 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $24.46 | -1.25% | 23B | 9.41 | $2.60 | +4.66% |
| WDC | $63.99 | +1.11% | 22.3B | 21.91 | $2.92 | +0.16% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| PSTG | $57.58 | +3.94% | 18.8B | 151.50 | $0.38 | N/A |
| LOGI | $90.13 | -0.03% | 13.4B | 21.82 | $4.13 | +1.52% |
Stock Comparison
NTAP vs ANET Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while ANET trades at $102.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DELL Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while DELL trades at $122.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STX Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while STX trades at $144.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SMCI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while SMCI trades at $49.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs HPQ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while HPQ trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs WDC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while WDC trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CAJ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs PSTG Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while PSTG trades at $57.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 151.50. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs LOGI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while LOGI trades at $90.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs IONQ-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while IONQ-WT trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs IONQ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while IONQ trades at $42.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -28.48. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SNDKV Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QBTS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while QBTS trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -22.18. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QBTS-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while QBTS-WT trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RGTI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while RGTI trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RGTIW Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while RGTIW trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QUBT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while QUBT trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CRCT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while CRCT trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MKFG-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CRSR Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 997.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while CRSR trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SSYS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 964M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while SSYS trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RCAT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 716.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while RCAT trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs NNDM Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 352M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while NNDM trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DDD Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while DDD trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CAN Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while CAN trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs TIO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DM Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MICT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MKFG Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs ALOT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while ALOT trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs YIBO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while YIBO trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs INVE Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while INVE trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs OSS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 76.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while OSS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs ZSPC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while ZSPC trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QMCO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while QMCO trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STRC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs TACT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while TACT trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs FATH Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs KTCC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while KTCC trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs EBON Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while EBON trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs UAVS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while UAVS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SGE Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs VLD Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SCKT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while SCKT trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs VJET Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STRCW Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21.3B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $106.55, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.79, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.