NetApp, Inc.
NetApp, Inc. NTAP Peers
See (NTAP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | $104.66 | -1.15% | 21B | 18.45 | $5.67 | +1.98% |
| ANET | $114.04 | +0.88% | 143.2B | 48.11 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $128.35 | +0.89% | 87.1B | 20.12 | $6.38 | +1.51% |
| STX | $152.73 | -0.02% | 32.4B | 21.95 | $6.95 | +1.86% |
| SMCI | $52.52 | +1.59% | 31.3B | 28.54 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $25.69 | -0.73% | 24.1B | 9.87 | $2.60 | +4.46% |
| WDC | $69.02 | -0.43% | 24.1B | 23.64 | $2.92 | +0.14% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| PSTG | $56.96 | -0.63% | 18.6B | 149.87 | $0.38 | N/A |
| LOGI | $95.72 | -1.75% | 14.2B | 23.17 | $4.13 | +1.42% |
Stock Comparison
NTAP vs ANET Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 143.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while ANET trades at $114.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 48.11. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DELL Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while DELL trades at $128.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STX Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while STX trades at $152.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SMCI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while SMCI trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs HPQ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while HPQ trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs WDC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while WDC trades at $69.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CAJ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs PSTG Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while PSTG trades at $56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 149.87. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs LOGI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while LOGI trades at $95.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs IONQ Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while IONQ trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -29.08. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs IONQ-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while IONQ-WT trades at $32.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SNDKV Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QBTS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while QBTS trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -29.93. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QBTS-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while QBTS-WT trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RGTI Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while RGTI trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RGTIW Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while RGTIW trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QUBT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while QUBT trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -31.39. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CRCT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while CRCT trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MKFG-WT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CRSR Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 986.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while CRSR trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs RCAT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 974.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while RCAT trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -19.41. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SSYS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 924.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while SSYS trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs NNDM Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 330.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while NNDM trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DDD Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 255.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while DDD trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs CAN Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 240.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while CAN trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs DM Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs TIO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs OSS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while OSS trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MICT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs MKFG Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs INVE Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while INVE trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs ALOT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while ALOT trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs YIBO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while YIBO trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs ZSPC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while ZSPC trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STRC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs QMCO Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while QMCO trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs UAVS Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while UAVS trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs TACT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while TACT trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs FATH Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs KTCC Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while KTCC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs EBON Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while EBON trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SGE Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs VLD Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs SCKT Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while SCKT trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs VJET Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.
NTAP vs STRCW Comparison
NTAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTAP stands at 21B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTAP is priced at $104.66, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTAP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.45, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, NTAP's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTAP is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTAP.